On Sep 27, 2007, at 8:22 PM, Greg Black wrote:
Since we're close to a new release, I'm wondering what experience
people
have had recently with running in 64-bit mode. Are most of those
broken
ports now fixed? Or is there some magic that allows building of just
the broken ones in 32-bit mo
FreeBSD Tinderbox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Kernel build for LINT started on Fri Sep 28 16:57:17 UTC 2007
stage 1: configuring the kernel
> --
> cd /src/sys/amd64/conf;
> PATH=/obj/amd64/src/tmp/legacy/usr/sbin:/obj/amd64/src
TB --- 2007-09-28 15:08:10 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2007-09-28 15:08:10 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2007-09-28 15:08:10 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2007-09-28 15:08:53 - checking out the source tree
TB --- 2007-09-28 15:08:53 - cd
hi dear list,
I like kindly ask if the new Intel Storage Server SSR212MC2 with the RAID
controller SRCSAS144E
(http://download.intel.com/support/motherboards/server/ssr212mc2/sb/ssr212mc
2_tps_12.pdf) is supported by latest FreeBSD.
Thank you very much.
Roberto
Again me sorry,
I like ask also about the support of the top in class controller raid by
intel http://download.intel.com/products/RAIDcontrollers/SRCSASJV/318035.pdf
SRCSASJV
Thank you.
Rob.
-Original Message-
From: Roberto Della Pasqua - CreatEmotions(TM)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
On 27/09/2007, Roland Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 07:35:28PM +0100, Chris wrote:
> > > > However I seen this in geli within an hour of using it.
> > > >
> > > > GEOM_ELI: Crypto WRITE request failed (error=1).
> > > > ad6s1c.eli[WRITE(offset=0, length=131072)]
> > >
>
On 28/09/2007, Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 06:30:20PM +0100, Chris wrote:
> > On 27/09/2007, Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 04:44:09PM +0100, Chris wrote:
>
> [...]
> > >
> > > > The card is more stable when using
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Vivek Khera wrote:
VK>
VK> On Sep 27, 2007, at 8:22 PM, Greg Black wrote:
VK>
VK> > Since we're close to a new release, I'm wondering what experience people
VK> > have had recently with running in 64-bit mode. Are most of those broken
VK> > ports now fixed? Or is there som
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 07:05:35PM +0100, Chris wrote:
> On 28/09/2007, Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 06:30:20PM +0100, Chris wrote:
> > > On 27/09/2007, Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 04:44:09PM +0100, Chris w
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 10:28:01AM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
[snip]
> ATM nfe(4)'s interrupt moderation mechanism doesn't seem to work
> at all so nfe(4) generates too many interrupts. However I don't
> think it wouldn't be major bottleneck of the performance.
Could this be why (on -current) I
On 29/09/2007, Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 07:05:35PM +0100, Chris wrote:
> > On 28/09/2007, Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 06:30:20PM +0100, Chris wrote:
> > > > On 27/09/2007, Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 04:07:33AM +0100, Chris wrote:
>
> Will let you know results thanks, also will polling work on my card?
>
Yes.
--
Regards,
Pyun YongHyeon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinf
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 07:21:47PM -0700, Jos Backus wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 10:28:01AM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> [snip]
> > ATM nfe(4)'s interrupt moderation mechanism doesn't seem to work
> > at all so nfe(4) generates too many interrupts. However I don't
> > think it wouldn't
13 matches
Mail list logo
