- "Artem Kuchin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> But i don't understand how and why it happened. ONly 6 hours ago (a
> night before)
> all those files were backed up fine w/o any read error. And now, right
> after replacing
> the driver and starting rebuild it said that there are bad sectors
- "Martin Nilsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That is what patrol read is intended to detect before it is a problem.
>
> In a RAID5 array the checksums are only used when reconstructing data,
>
> if you have a bad block in a checksum sector it will not be detected
> until a drive have fa
> This isn't really accurate. First of all, if the RAID
> controller isn't confirming checksums before giving the data to
> the OS, what is the checksum for exactly?
The checksum is used to recover the data in the event one piece of the data is
lost. With all of the data but one piece, and
On Thursday 23 August 2007 14:37:57 Ian Smith wrote:
> > so now I did because of your question and it seems the power_profile
> > script has a bug
> >
> > I tries to set hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest=C1
> >
> > but I guess it should be dev.cpu.0.cx_lowest
>
> Ah, ok. Updated in HEAD but not STABLE:
Tom Samplonius wrote:
- "Artem Kuchin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ...
But i don't understand how and why it happened. ONly 6 hours ago (a
night before) all those files were backed up fine w/o any read
error. And now, right after replacing the driver and starting
rebuild it said that there a
> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 17:12:44 -0300
> From: Carlos Porto Filho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
> Subject: error - snmp_bridge
>
> During the make buildworld (6stable) i got this:
> Change begemotBridgeBaseName > bridge_oid.h
> line 31: '(' expected at begin of node
> contex
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, Carlos Porto Filho wrote:
Hi,
During the make buildworld (6stable) i got this:
Change begemotBridgeBaseName > bridge_oid.h
line 31: '(' expected at begin of node
context: " TruthValue ENUM (
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src/usr.sbin/bsnmpd/modules/sn
Shteryana Shopova wrote:
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 17:12:44 -0300
From: Carlos Porto Filho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: error - snmp_bridge
During the make buildworld (6stable) i got this:
Change begemotBridgeBaseName > bridge_oid.h
line 31: '(' expected at begin of n
Friday 24 August 2007 23:04:37 kirjutas Matthew Dillon:
>A friend of mine once told me that the only worthwhile RAID systems are
>the ones that email you a detailed message when something goes south.
>
> -Matt
> _
David O'Brien wrote:
This is a patch to MFC what I think are all the calcru-related changes
that occurred since 6-STABLE was branched and 7.0 continued forward.
If anyone spots some changes I missed, please yell out.
Thank you so much! My supermicro systems are plagued by calcru messages
On 8/25/07, Tom Samplonius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> - "Artem Kuchin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...
> > But i don't understand how and why it happened. ONly 6 hours ago (a
> > night before)
> > all those files were backed up fine w/o any read error. And now, right
> > after replacing
- "David Schwartz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It is supposed to be
> > for detecting data corruption, so if the card isn't using the
> > checksum, its kinda of useless.
>
> You are confused. Checking for data corruption is done, by checking if
> the *DATA* is corrupt. This does not req
12 matches
Mail list logo
