While I haven't seen any problem with patch itself since it just
adding a _useful_ knob, I personaly managed to use procmail to filter
most of that SPAM. My solution is not as CPU friendly as patch but
2000 messages is not an ultimate load for modern comps.
+1 for adding the patch. Also, will not
On 2007-Jun-19 02:58:20 -0400, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 02:39:22PM +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote:
>> I was asking about nullfs because the following lines
>> in sys/conf/NOTES:
>>
>> # NB: The NULL, PORTAL, UMAP and UNION filesystems are known to be
>> # buggy,
Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> I think that topic is not about "how we can do it another way", but why
> this patch was not commited. This patch doesn't change current behavior,
> but allows operator to choose another behavior.
> Allowing more choices is always good thing, so I am for commiting th
On 6/21/07, Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2007-Jun-19 02:58:20 -0400, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 02:39:22PM +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote:
>> I was asking about nullfs because the following lines
>> in sys/conf/NOTES:
>>
>> # NB: The NULL, PORTAL, UM
Hi,
I have a serious problem with my network.
I have connected 2 PC's, 1 - FreeBSD, 2 - Windows XP.
The problem is follow - My FreeBSD limmiting connections , I cannot open
more 224 TCP4-Sockets in my Windows Box.
When I downloading torrent file, I cannot create more connections to the
web, and
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 09:49:16PM +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote:
> On 6/21/07, Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On 2007-Jun-19 02:58:20 -0400, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 02:39:22PM +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote:
> >>> I was asking about nullfs because the
On 6/21/07, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 09:49:16PM +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote:
> On 6/21/07, Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On 2007-Jun-19 02:58:20 -0400, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 02:39:22PM +0800, Rong-en
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 12:59:31AM +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote:
> On 6/21/07, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 09:49:16PM +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote:
> >> On 6/21/07, Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >On 2007-Jun-19 02:58:20 -0400, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PRO
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 12:56:46PM -0700, Kurt Buff wrote:
On 6/20/07, Jo Rhett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If I get a message every day saying "No output", how do I know when a
failure has occurred? This patch changes nothing about that
behavior. Getting no mes
