On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 02:39:22PM +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote:
> On 6/19/07, Josh Paetzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Tuesday 19 June 2007, Rong-en Fan wrote:
> >> I'm running 6.2-RELEASE, and I am wondering
> >> if using nullfs w/ rw is safe in a production environment?
> >> My impression is th
I use it all the time for compiles on top of nfs
On 6/18/07, Rong-en Fan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm running 6.2-RELEASE, and I am wondering
if using nullfs w/ rw is safe in a production environment?
My impression is that ro nullfs is ok, but not rw.
Is this still the case?
Regards,
Rong-En
Rodrigo Galiano wrote:
> No, if you make 'deinstall' under a specific port it will only uninstall
> the
> software package with the dependencies. If you want to deinstall
> dependencies do the command 'make clean' to check out what will be
> actually
> installed and diff the output with the results
Sigh . . .
Here are the patches I was trying to upload when the PR was closed
without mercy. :)
jmc
# Patch for misc/113825 for csup
#
# To apply this patch:
# STEP 1: Chdir to the source directory.
# STEP 2: Run the 'applypatch' program with this patch file as input.
#
# If you do not have
Maybe you would like unified diff's better? Sorry . . .
jmc
# misc/113825
#
# To apply this patch:
# STEP 1: Chdir to the source directory.
# STEP 2: Run the 'applypatch' program with this patch file as input.
#
# If you do not have 'applypatch', it is part of the 'makepatch' package
# that you
Rong-en Fan wrote:
> I'm running 6.2-RELEASE, and I am wondering
> if using nullfs w/ rw is safe in a production environment?
> My impression is that ro nullfs is ok, but not rw.
> Is this still the case?
I've been using a r/w nullfs for the last several months with no issues.
Granted, I don't do
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 09:29:09 -0500
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A RELENG_6 kernel from May 21 works fine with skype but boot a newer
> kernel and skype seems to be blocking port 80. Apache logs show
> nothing. I can find no logs errors anywhere but a telnet to port 80
On Sunday 17 June 2007 00:24, Artem Kuchin wrote:
> Maybe someone can englighten me when
> inode change time changes? What must be done
> with file to change it (except writing to it)?
stat(2) would be very enlightening in this context.
> I tried chmoding - it does not affect inode time.
chmod w
On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 23:40 +1000, Norberto Meijome wrote:
>
> On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 09:29:09 -0500
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > A RELENG_6 kernel from May 21 works fine with skype but boot a newer
> > kernel and skype seems to be blocking port 80. Apache logs show
>
Tom Evans wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 23:40 +1000, Norberto Meijome wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 09:29:09 -0500
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A RELENG_6 kernel from May 21 works fine with skype but boot a newer
kernel and skype seems to be blocking port 80. Apache logs show
Greetings!
You have a state-of-the-art software application, but do your customers know
it?
Bridge the gap between your latest software solutions and the end user with
video.
PixelFish is a video production company that excels at producing high-quality
videos that sell. Our talented and acc
Greetings!
You have a state-of-the-art software application, but do your customers know
it?
Bridge the gap between your latest software solutions and the end user with
video.
PixelFish is a video production company that excels at producing high-quality
videos that sell. Our talented and acc
Hello,
I'm using unionfs on a recently (approx. 5 days ago) cvsup'ed
6.2-STABLE with the
http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/unionfs6-p19-20070504.diff
patch and have a problem with devfs mounted over unionfs.
I made a testsetup in March where I used a 6.2-STABLE at that
time without addi
Hi!
> I'm using unionfs on a recently (approx. 5 days ago) cvsup'ed
> 6.2-STABLE with the
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/unionfs6-p19-20070504.diff
>
> patch and have a problem with devfs mounted over unionfs.
Going back to the most recent stable without unionfs6-p19-20070504
wor
Rong-en Fan wrote:
> I'm running 6.2-RELEASE, and I am wondering
> if using nullfs w/ rw is safe in a production environment?
> My impression is that ro nullfs is ok, but not rw.
> Is this still the case?
nullfs is quite stable from my impression at least for my workload. We
use it for some heavi
On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 17:26:59 +0100
Tom Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Doesn't this imply that the OP was running Skype as root?
touche.
but from what OP described, that's what was happening... :D ouch :D
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
"Any society that would give u
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/88486
This patch was supplied 2 years ago now. It doesn't change current/
expected behavior but does allow those of us with many, many systems
to not get useless e-mail.
It's not even my patch! I would simply like to see this done...
--
Jo Rh
17 matches
Mail list logo
