Re: Unrecognized archive format with RELENG_6_2 and RELENG_6

2007-06-04 Thread Robin Gruyters
Quoting Daniel O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Friday 01 June 2007 23:39, Robin Gruyters wrote: > What happens if you try > tar -b 128 -tf /dev/sa0 Same problem. > What did you upgrade from? Some gnutar using system I guess? (5.x > or 4.x?) I'd upgraded from FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p10 OK. Ca

Re: Sysinstall replacement

2007-06-04 Thread Ivan Voras
Craig Boston wrote: I also don't think that ext2 should be offered in the installer, as there have been periodic stability problems with it, and new users accustomed to Linux may pick it out of habit and get bitten. I advocate the opposite view: if it doesn't get exposition, it won't be fixed

Re: Sysinstall replacement

2007-06-04 Thread Oliver Fromme
Craig Boston wrote: > Ivan Voras wrote: > > See http://wiki.freebsd.org/finstall . > > Somewhat tangental, the only thing that really jumps out at me is this: > > > I propose the UFS+gjournal be the default FS type (even for > > root+boot?) > > I think this is not such a good idea. Whi

Re: vnode_pager_putpages errors on 6.2

2007-06-04 Thread steve
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 06:15:14PM +0200, Christoph Schug wrote: > On Tue, May 29, 2007, steve wrote: > > > Howdy! > > > > I had this issue on 4.x, which is basically, I have > > machines that do cgi stuff for customers, and there is a local > > md device that is used as a tmp. When it fills

Re: release cycle

2007-06-04 Thread Chris
On 02/06/07, Fabian Keil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 29/05/07, Mark Linimon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 09:17:57PM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote: > > > Agreed. 6.3-RELEASE would nominally be due around July but the lack > > > of any sc

Re: release cycle

2007-06-04 Thread Chris
On 02/06/07, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Jun 2, 2007, at 3:45 , Chris wrote: > Given that Kris repeatedly tells me and others that the ports system > is only supported on the latest freebsd release (meaning one has to be > upgrading freebsd on their servers every few

Re: release cycle

2007-06-04 Thread Chris
On 02/06/07, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 02:02:44PM +0200, Fabian Keil wrote: > Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 29/05/07, Mark Linimon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 09:17:57PM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote: > > > > Agreed. 6.3

Re: release cycle

2007-06-04 Thread Doug Barton
Chris wrote: > So my question remains when we have 7.0 and 6.3 both STABLE releases > will the ports tree not be supported in 6.3 a just released version of > FreeBSD? I can't help but get the impression that you're spoiling for a fight here, so let me ask you to take step 1, which is relax a lit

Re: release cycle

2007-06-04 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 09:17:17PM +0100, Chris wrote: > On 02/06/07, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 02:02:44PM +0200, Fabian Keil wrote: > >> Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > On 29/05/07, Mark Linimon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > On Tue, May

Re: release cycle

2007-06-04 Thread Paul Allen
>From Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 01:55:01PM -0700: > Chris wrote: > > > So my question remains when we have 7.0 and 6.3 both STABLE releases > > will the ports tree not be supported in 6.3 a just released version of > > FreeBSD? > You are focusing on released version num