On Thu, May 24, 2007, Artem Kuchin wrote:
>>> What i don't understand, is how the appropriate 'so'
>>> is selected? How freebsd known which so to load
>>> this
>>> libc.so.5
>>> or this
>>> libc.so.6
>>> ?
>> Did you recompile Perl after the last installworld? If not, do so.
> No i did not do it ex
>Hmm, I have the x11/xorg port, same problem "could not open default font
>'fixed'" Oh, well. So now I have an X-less system, Don't mind so much myself,
>but my other family members freaked out :( They thought the shell prompt was
>an error message!
You can try to install x11-fonts/font-alias p
On Wednesday 23 May 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 11:06:46AM +0300, Iulian M wrote:
> >
> > Yep... you have to rebuild everything. Not to fix the error but just
> > because you don't read other threads on the ML
> >
> >
> > On another thread the conclusion was that installi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Artem Kuchin wrote:
> Stanislaw Halik wrote:
>> On Thu, May 24, 2007, Artem Kuchin wrote:
>>> What i don't understand, is how the appropriate 'so'
>>> is selected? How freebsd known which so to load
>>> this
>>> libc.so.5
>>> or this
>>> libc.so.6
>>
Karol Kwiatkowski wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Artem Kuchin wrote:
Stanislaw Halik wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2007, Artem Kuchin wrote:
What i don't understand, is how the appropriate 'so'
is selected? How freebsd known which so to load
this
libc.so.5
or this
libc.so.6
?
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 01:11:38AM +0200, Gheorghe Ardelean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to use two SATA II disks over an Adaptec 1210SA PCI SATA
> Controller (based on SiI 3112 SATA150 chip).
>
> While trying to use the disks I get shortly the following message and the
> system is hard freezi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Artem Kuchin wrote:
> Karol Kwiatkowski wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA256
>>
>> Artem Kuchin wrote:
>>> Stanislaw Halik wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2007, Artem Kuchin wrote:
> What i don't understand, is how the appropr
Karol Kwiatkowski wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Artem Kuchin wrote:
Karol Kwiatkowski wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Artem Kuchin wrote:
Stanislaw Halik wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2007, Artem Kuchin wrote:
What i don't understand, is how the app
Maybe it is the wrong list, but maybe someone can quickly
help me out.
I have a very stupid problem. I cannot convert to upper
or lower case using manually set locale (setlocale(..)).
A very simple program:
#include
#include
#include
main(){
char *b=setlocale(LC_CTYPE, "ru_RU.CP1251
Artem Kuchin wrote:
> Ahh, well, i just forgot. Of course it is not for a long time
> now. But anyhow, why locale in C does not work? And how 'so' lib
> is selected for an executable? How OS selected so.5 or so.6 for a
> executable file?
During compile-time linking (when ld(1) is called),
usua
From the setlocale(3) manual page:
... A locale argument of NULL causes setlocale() to return the
current locale. ...
--
-max
2007/5/24, Artem Kuchin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Maybe it is the wrong list, but maybe someone can quickly
help me out.
I have a very stupid problem. I cannot conve
Massimo Fusaro wrote:
From the setlocale(3) manual page:
... A locale argument of NULL causes setlocale() to return the
current locale. ...
Right. that why i first
call
setlocale(LC_CTYPE, "ru_RU.CP1251");
to set locale
and the call
setlocale(LC_CTYPE,NULL);
to check what locale is curren
Artem Kuchin wrote:
> I have a very stupid problem. I cannot convert to upper
> or lower case using manually set locale (setlocale(..)).
>
> A very simple program:
> [...]
> printf("IS UPPER ?: %d\n",isupper('?'));
> printf("IS UPPER ?: %d\n",isupper('?'));
> printf
On 2007-May-23 11:06:46 +0300, Iulian M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wednesday 23 May 2007, Andriy Babiy wrote:
>> Fatal server error:
>> could not open default font 'fixed'
>
>On another thread the conclusion was that installing x11-fonts/font-alias
>solved the fixed font problem.
I've found t
Oliver Fromme wrote:
Artem Kuchin wrote:
I have a very stupid problem. I cannot convert to upper
or lower case using manually set locale (setlocale(..)).
A very simple program:
[...]
printf("IS UPPER ?: %d\n",isupper('?'));
printf("IS UPPER ?: %d\n",isupper('?'));
printf
* Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-24 21:40 +1000]:
> I've found this problem on one system (the one where I thought the
> upgrade had gone the most cleanly). font-alias _is_ installed but
> most of my pcf.gz files are corrupt (20 bytes long).
>
> 'portupgrade -f' on my fonts is fixing t
Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2007-May-23 11:06:46 +0300, Iulian M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 23 May 2007, Andriy Babiy wrote:
Fatal server error:
could not open default font 'fixed'
On another thread the conclusion was that installing x11-fonts/font-alias
solved the fixed font problem.
Hello,
I've been trying to update my system recently.
(using cvsup to sync the sources, *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6)
uname -a
FreeBSD machine.somewhere 6.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #2: Thu
Sep 28 23:13:24 CEST 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/NOYAU_IPFW amd64
mak
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 05:16:47AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>3. atapicam cd error (JoaoBR)
>
> --
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 12:44:20 -0300
> From: JoaoBR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: atapicam cd error
> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
> Messag
On Wed, 23 May 2007 17:40:25 -0300
JoaoBR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday 23 May 2007 14:03:18 Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 01:49:33PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
>
> > > > acd0: CDRW at ata0-master UDMA33
> > > > acd0: FAILURE - INQUIRY ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x24 as
On Thursday 24 May 2007 15:15:51 you wrote:
> On Wed, 23 May 2007 17:40:25 -0300
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~> uname -a
> FreeBSD asus64.konav201.local 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #1: Tue Apr
> 17 17:38:20 HST 2007
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~> dmesg
On Thu, 24 May 2007 15:48:04 -0300
JoaoBR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thursday 24 May 2007 15:15:51 you wrote:
> > On Wed, 23 May 2007 17:40:25 -0300
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~> uname -a
> > FreeBSD asus64.konav201.local 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #1: Tue
> > Apr 17 17:38:20 HST 2007
>
On Thursday 24 May 2007 12:12:34 Joe Altman wrote:
> >
> > __FBSDID("$FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/ata/atapi-cam.c,v 1.42.2.5
> > 2007/05/15
> > 16:19:42 thomas Exp $");
>
> I am, and I just wanted to acknowledge your message, unfortunately I
> won't be able to further look into it immediately, as I'm ab
On Thursday 24 May 2007 16:10:02 Robert Marella wrote:
> On Thu, 24 May 2007 15:48:04 -0300
> >
> > Hi
> > so you are suggesting a rollback? I compiled on may 21st and 23rd
> > and as Joe Altman confirmed too it's not working anymore on amd64 ...
> > on i386 it's ok, may be this is a good moment
Doug White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Log:
> Fix assertion accidentally changed to HEAD version. This was breaking the
> RELENG_6 build.
>
> Pointy hat to: des
Apologies for the breakage, which should be fixed now. I was working
through my MFC reminder backlog and got a little ahead
On Thu, 24 May 2007 16:41:01 -0300
JoaoBR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday 24 May 2007 16:10:02 Robert Marella wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 May 2007 15:48:04 -0300
> > >
> > > Hi
> > > so you are suggesting a rollback? I compiled on may 21st and 23rd
> > > and as Joe Altman confirmed too it
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 11:46:24AM +0400, grimnir wrote:
> You can try to install x11-fonts/font-alias port, this may fix the problem.
nope:
jhengis~ % pkg_info | grep font-alias
font-alias-1.0.1X.Org Font aliases
pkg_info: show_file: can't open '+COMMENT' for reading
This does not seem to be
On Thursday 24 May 2007 21:48:04 JoaoBR wrote:
> On Thursday 24 May 2007 15:15:51 you wrote:
> > On Wed, 23 May 2007 17:40:25 -0300
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~> uname -a
> > FreeBSD asus64.konav201.local 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #1: Tue Apr
> > 17 17:38:20 HST 2007
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/o
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 03:00:11PM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> * Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-24 21:40 +1000]:
> > I've found this problem on one system (the one where I thought the
> > upgrade had gone the most cleanly). font-alias _is_ installed but
> > most of my pcf.gz files
* Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-24 16:19 -0400]:
> On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 03:00:11PM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> > * Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-24 21:40 +1000]:
> > > I've found this problem on one system (the one where I thought the
> > > upgrade had gone the mos
Hello,
cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=pentiumpro -Werror -D_KERNEL
-DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I- -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -I@/../include
-finline-limit=8000 -fno-common -mno-align-long-strings
-mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2
-ffreestanding -Wall -Wre
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 10:42:38PM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> * Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-24 16:19 -0400]:
> > On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 03:00:11PM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> > > * Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-24 21:40 +1000]:
> > > > I've found this proble
cvsup and built around 20.30 BST
cd /usr/src; make -f Makefile.inc1 install
===> share/info install
===> include install
creating osreldate.h from newvers.sh
touch: not found
***error code 127
Stop in /usr/src/include
***error code 1
I tried cd usr.bin/touch && make && make install
but it do
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 11:57:46PM +0300, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote:
> /usr/src/sys/modules/procfs/../../fs/procfs/procfs_regs.c: In function
> `procfs_doprocregs':
> /usr/src/sys/modules/procfs/../../fs/procfs/procfs_regs.c:96: warning:
> implicit declaration of function `PROC_ASSERT_HELD'
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 09:46:30PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> cvsup and built around 20.30 BST
> cd /usr/src; make -f Makefile.inc1 install
> ===> share/info install
> ===> include install
> creating osreldate.h from newvers.sh
> touch: not found
> ***error code 127
>
> Stop in /usr/src/in
On Thursday 24 May 2007 17:19:00 Andy Fawcett wrote:
>
> ping# uname -a
> FreeBSD ping.int.athame.co.uk 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #0: Wed May 23
> 15:19:22 EEST 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PING
> amd64
>
> (compiled from sources updated immediately before the build started,
Clock in sync? That's the usual cause for things like this.
Steve
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cvsup and built around 20.30 BST
cd /usr/src; make -f Makefile.inc1 install
===> share/info install
===> include install
creating osreldate.h from newvers.sh
touch: not f
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 12:45:52AM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> * Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-24 17:08 -0400]:
> > > Unfortunately portupgrade (nor portupgrade-devel) cannot yet handle
> > > the rigors of the xorg upgrade without a small bit of help:
> > >
> > > # portupg
On Thu, 24 May 2007 18:46:09 -0300
JoaoBR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 24 May 2007 17:19:00 Andy Fawcett wrote:
> >
> > ping# uname -a
> > FreeBSD ping.int.athame.co.uk 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #0: Wed
> > May 23 15:19:22 EEST 2007
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PING a
* Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-24 17:08 -0400]:
> > Unfortunately portupgrade (nor portupgrade-devel) cannot yet handle
> > the rigors of the xorg upgrade without a small bit of help:
> >
> > # portupgrade -Rf libXft
> >
> > before you do the portupgrade -a?
>
> No, that is t
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Grr, OK. Well, you might have got it wrong, so we still need to see a
portupgrade log from someone who followed the directions.
Kris,
FWIW - I followed the instructions in UPDATING - unfortunately I did 'em
pretty much as I read 'em... so I noticed the CAVEAT *after* th
On Thu, 24 May 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
cvsup and built around 20.30 BST
cd /usr/src; make -f Makefile.inc1 install
===> share/info install
===> include install
creating osreldate.h from newvers.sh
touch: not found
***error code 127
Stop in /usr/src/include
***error code 1
I tried cd usr
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 11:59:51AM +1200, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >
> >Grr, OK. Well, you might have got it wrong, so we still need to see a
> >portupgrade log from someone who followed the directions.
>
> Kris,
>
> FWIW - I followed the instructions in UPDATING - unfortuna
On Friday 25 May 2007 00:46:09 JoaoBR wrote:
> On Thursday 24 May 2007 17:19:00 Andy Fawcett wrote:
> > ping# uname -a
> > FreeBSD ping.int.athame.co.uk 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #0: Wed May
> > 23 15:19:22 EEST 2007
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PING amd64
> >
> > (compiled fr
Robert Marella wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2007 18:46:09 -0300
JoaoBR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thursday 24 May 2007 17:19:00 Andy Fawcett wrote:
ping# uname -a
FreeBSD ping.int.athame.co.uk 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #0: Wed
May 23 15:19:22 EEST 2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PI
On Thu, 24 May 2007 19:31:49 -0600
Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Marella wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 May 2007 18:46:09 -0300
> > JoaoBR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thursday 24 May 2007 17:19:00 Andy Fawcett wrote:
> >>> ping# uname -a
> >>> FreeBSD ping.int.athame.co.uk 6.2-
uname -a
FreeBSD sagan.cai 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #0: Sat May 5 23:34:08 CST
2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SAGAN i386
The results of make buildworld on this system:
ide -k _crunched_chroot_stub chroot.lo
cc -static -o rescue rescue.o cat.lo chflags.lo chio.lo chmod.lo
Actually, I don't see how RELENG_X branch will help. %-\
I would suggest this scheme:
branch "." - as now, the recent versions
branch "sec" - versions bump strictly at 1-st of january and 1-st of july,
other updates fix only security issues.
That would be really great improvement to ports, but
48 matches
Mail list logo
