Hi all!
I have the folliwing issue on 6.1 and 6.2
df -k utility always shows me incorrect disk usage.
Server with 6.1 on board:
===
x# uname -a
FreeBSD x 6.1-RELEASE-p6 FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p6 #0: Mon Sep 18 17:06:13
MSD 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/
Hi all!
I have the folliwing issue on 6.1 and 6.2
df -k utility always shows me incorrect disk usage.
Server with 6.1 on board:
===
x# uname -a
FreeBSD x 6.1-RELEASE-p6 FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p6 #0: Mon Sep 18 17:06:13
MSD 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/
Hi,
Newtunes Support wrote:
Hi all!
I have the folliwing issue on 6.1 and 6.2
df -k utility always shows me incorrect disk usage.
This is more for questions@
and already discussed many times:
from man tunefs:
-m minfree
Specify the percentage of space held back from normal
On Tue, 8 May 2007, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
So, over 7000 sockets with pretty much all processes shut down ...
Shouldn't the garbage collector be cutting in somewhere here?
I'm willing to shut everthing down like this again the next time it happens
(in 2-3 days) if someone has some other com
On 2007-May-08 13:04:55 +0400, Hanatsu Tori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>x# df -k
>Filesystem 1K-blocks UsedAvail Capacity Mounted on
>/dev/ad4s1a 76866422 51507978 1920913273%/
>devfs 110 100%/dev
>*/dev/ad6s1d 77879478 75006042 -3356922
My clock is now _15 minutes_ late, after about 1 day with powerd
running.
ntpd is running also.
Can nobody tell where the problem is here?
m.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsub
Dear all,
I have just completed the merge of a significant number of UNIX domain socket
bug fixes and cleanups from HEAD to RELENG_6. While my hope is that these are
generally low-risk, and should improve UNIX domain socket stability and
performance under load, there were quite a few changes
Martin Dieringer wrote:
> My clock is now _15 minutes_ late, after about 1 day with powerd
> running.
> ntpd is running also.
> Can nobody tell where the problem is here?
Are you sure that your /etc/ntp.conf ist correct?
Are there any messages from ntpd in /var/log/messages?
What's the output
On Tue, 8 May 2007 14:03:58 +0200 (CEST), Martin Dieringer wrote:
>
>
> My clock is now _15 minutes_ late, after about 1 day with powerd
> running.
> ntpd is running also.
> Can nobody tell where the problem is here?
You say that ntpd is running, but what does the output of 'ntpq -p'
show?
Is
When I use 'top' command to check my system, some processes are shown like
''. The manual told these processes are swapped out.
But my problem is .. I don't have swapping device (swapoff -a). Where are
they swapped to ?
last pid: 29144; load averages: 0.69, 0.67, 0.82
up 19+11:25:27 21:05:0
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > If I remember correctly, you wrote that 11k sockets are
> > in use with 90 jails. That's about 120 sockets per jail,
> > which isn't out of the ordinary. Of course it depends on
> > what is running in those jails, but my guess is that you
>
Mars G. Miro wrote:
> Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > Mars G. Miro wrote:
> > > there's been a lot of threads in teh past that a buildworld on mfs
> > > increases speed --- tho it might not be the appropriate test for
> > > high-end machines (speaking of w/c I just gots a T2000).
> >
> > It depend
On Tue, 8 May 2007, Oliver Fromme wrote:
Martin Dieringer wrote:
> My clock is now _15 minutes_ late, after about 1 day with powerd
> running.
> ntpd is running also.
> Can nobody tell where the problem is here?
Are you sure that your /etc/ntp.conf ist correct?
# cat /etc/ntp.conf
server ti
On Tue, 8 May 2007 15:33:51 +0200 (CEST), Martin Dieringer wrote:
> On Tue, 8 May 2007, Oliver Fromme wrote:
>
>> Martin Dieringer wrote:
>>> My clock is now _15 minutes_ late, after about 1 day with powerd
>>> running.
>>> ntpd is running also.
>>> Can nobody tell where the problem is here?
>>
>
I just cvsup'ed from cvsup5.freebsd.org with tag RELENG_6. When doing a
buildkernel I get the following message:
Make: don't know how to make /usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_proto.c. Stop.
uipc_proto.c doesn't exist..
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Ken
___
freebsd-stab
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 10:00:08AM -0400, Ken Sallot wrote:
> I just cvsup'ed from cvsup5.freebsd.org with tag RELENG_6. When doing a
> buildkernel I get the following message:
>
> Make: don't know how to make /usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_proto.c. Stop.
>
> uipc_proto.c doesn't exist..
>
> Any ideas
Martin Dieringer wrote:
> Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > Are you sure that your /etc/ntp.conf ist correct?
>
> # cat /etc/ntp.conf
>
> server time.fu-berlin.de iburst maxpoll 9
> driftfile /var/db/ntp.drift
> logfile /var/log/ntpd
You must add "restrict" lines for every server and for
localhos
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 07:29:08AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 10:00:08AM -0400, Ken Sallot wrote:
> > I just cvsup'ed from cvsup5.freebsd.org with tag RELENG_6. When doing a
> > buildkernel I get the following message:
> >
> > Make: don't know how to make /usr/src/sys
Peter,
I have resolved this issue using forsed unmount (umount -f /var)
And after I mounted /var again df -k shows me correct value.
But I have new problem.
fsck -y does not fix anything.
** Last Mounted on /var
** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes
INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=188426 (162368 should
Newtunes Support <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have resolved this issue using forsed unmount (umount -f /var)
Not a good idea. It breaks all sorts of things.
> And after I mounted /var again df -k shows me correct value.
The value was correct before, too. There probably were
some files that
On May 8, 2007, at 8:33 AM, Martin Dieringer wrote:
On Tue, 8 May 2007, Oliver Fromme wrote:
Martin Dieringer wrote:
> My clock is now _15 minutes_ late, after about 1 day with powerd
> running.
> ntpd is running also.
> Can nobody tell where the problem is here?
Are you sure that your /etc/n
On Tue, 8 May 2007, Oliver Fromme wrote:
Martin Dieringer wrote:
> Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > Are you sure that your /etc/ntp.conf ist correct?
>
> # cat /etc/ntp.conf
>
> server time.fu-berlin.de iburst maxpoll 9
> driftfile /var/db/ntp.drift
> logfile /var/log/ntpd
You must add "restrict" lines
On Tue, 8 May 2007, Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
On May 8, 2007, at 8:33 AM, Martin Dieringer wrote:
On Tue, 8 May 2007, Oliver Fromme wrote:
Martin Dieringer wrote:
My clock is now _15 minutes_ late, after about 1 day with powerd
running.
ntpd is running also.
Can nobody tell where the problem
On Tue, 8 May 2007, Richard Coleman wrote:
Martin Dieringer wrote:
What's the output from "ntpq -p"?
# ntpq -p
No association ID's returned
#
Are you using pf?
sorry for the short answer: no
m.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http:
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 07:35:23AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> Regardless, I'm building world now to try and replicate the issue.
buildworld and buildkernel both built fine here. Try re-sup'ing.
--
| Jeremy Chadwickjdc at parodius.com |
| Parodius Network
At 10:00 AM 5/8/2007, Ken Sallot wrote:
I just cvsup'ed from cvsup5.freebsd.org with tag RELENG_6. When doing a
buildkernel I get the following message:
Make: don't know how to make /usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_proto.c. Stop.
uipc_proto.c doesn't exist..
There were a lot of commits (14) in the pa
Thanks a lot for irrefragable answer, Oliver!
I have resolved the issue on one server (there was a little overdraft) and
I'll try to resolve issue with fsck and /var when PROD will have lower load.
Thanks to all,
Dmitry
2007/5/8, Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Newtunes Support <[EMAIL PR
Martin Dieringer wrote:
What's the output from "ntpq -p"?
# ntpq -p
No association ID's returned
#
Are you using pf? I think there is some kind of boot time race
condition between pf and ntpd. On my firewall (uses FreeBSD 6.2 with
pf), I always have to restart ntpd after boot, otherwise i
* Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-08 16:29 +0200]:
> How are you redialling? If you get a new dynamic IP
> address, it might be necessary to restart ntpd.
> For example, if you use ppp(8) for dial-up, you can
> write a "linkup" script that performs the restart.
I use the attached patch
On 08/05/07, Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2007-May-08 13:04:55 +0400, Hanatsu Tori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>x# df -k
>Filesystem 1K-blocks UsedAvail Capacity Mounted on
>/dev/ad4s1a 76866422 51507978 1920913273%/
>devfs 110 1
On Thu, 3 May 2007, Martin Dieringer wrote:
> On Thu, 3 May 2007, Ian Smith wrote:
> >
> > > > Now I got following while playing sound on the Compaq:
> > > >
> > > > kernel: calcru: runtime went backwards from 183711700 usec to
> > > > 183167434 usec for pid 12 (swi4: clock sio)
> > > >
>
On May 8, 2007, at 9:29 AM, Oliver Fromme wrote:
Martin Dieringer wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
Are you sure that your /etc/ntp.conf ist correct?
# cat /etc/ntp.conf
server time.fu-berlin.de iburst maxpoll 9
driftfile /var/db/ntp.drift
logfile /var/log/ntpd
You must add "restrict" lines for
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 07:35:23AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>> Regardless, I'm building world now to try and replicate the issue.
>
> buildworld and buildkernel both built fine here. Try re-sup'ing.
Yup, after getting your first note I switched to cvsup2, re-did it,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Tuesday, May 08, 2007 15:14:29 +0200 Oliver Fromme
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What kind of jails are those? What applications are
> running inside them? It's quite possible that the
> processes on one machine use 120 sockets per jail,
>
On Tue, 8 May 2007, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 07:35:23AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Regardless, I'm building world now to try and replicate the issue.
buildworld and buildkernel both built fine here. Try re-sup'ing.
I ran into a similar issue here -- for whatever
Could anyone recommend a good guide for developing one's own mfsroot
images suitable for recovery or scripted installation (not using
sysinstall)? It appears that one could develop a simplified
network-based installation process based around fdisk, disklabel,
newfs, mount_ufs, fetch, and pax, perh
On 2007-May-08 15:33:51 +0200, Martin Dieringer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
># cat /var/db/ntp.drift
>500.000
>#
There seems to be a bug in ntpd where the PLL can saturate at
+/-500ppm and will not recover. This problem seems too occur mostly
where the reference servers have lots of jitter (ie a f
On 2007-May-08 18:39:23 +0400, Newtunes Support <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have resolved this issue using forsed unmount (umount -f /var)
>And after I mounted /var again df -k shows me correct value.
>
>But I have new problem.
>fsck -y does not fix anything.
>
>** Last Mounted on /var
You left
On Wednesday 09 May 2007 03:40, Matthew X. Economou wrote:
> Could anyone recommend a good guide for developing one's own mfsroot
> images suitable for recovery or scripted installation (not using
> sysinstall)? It appears that one could develop a simplified
> network-based installation process ba
On 5/8/07, Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mars G. Miro wrote:
> Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > Mars G. Miro wrote:
> > > there's been a lot of threads in teh past that a buildworld on mfs
> > > increases speed --- tho it might not be the appropriate test for
> > > high-end machines (spea
Hi all,
Here's a quicky...
I've been running around upgrading some boxes to 6.2 from 4.11 using the
directions in UPDATING. I noticed that in the 4.x to 5.x step it's
basically mandatory to install the new bootloader:
cd /sys/boot
make STRIP= install
I see no such notes in the 5.x to 6.x g
TB --- 2007-05-09 04:36:05 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2007-05-09 04:36:05 - starting RELENG_5 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2007-05-09 04:36:05 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2007-05-09 04:36:36 - checking out the source tree
TB --- 2007-05-09 04:36:36
42 matches
Mail list logo
