On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, Matthew Jacob wrote:
Hi,
Is there any news on the performance of this card?
I personally have not been able to reproduce the problem. It seems to
occur whether in Integrated Raid or not. It seems to be related to
specific backplanes and drives. It's an important problem
Hi!
>I believe the culprit is somewhere in a recent MFC to atapi-cam.c (rev
>1.42.2.3) reverting to rev 1.42.2.2 fixes both the k3b system hangs
>and "INQUIRY ILLEGAL REQUEST" errors here.
I utillized the version of atapi-cam.c (rev. 1.42.2.1) and all works normally.
---
Adrian Chadd wrote:
I'm talking to someone about it who has some patches against -current.
We'll see what can be done.
Thankfully! The solution for FreeBSD looks doable without having to
keep NAT state like TPROXY does..
Adrian
just want to how's the progress regarding this issue.
TIA
zen wrote:
Adrian Chadd wrote:
I'm talking to someone about it who has some patches against -current.
We'll see what can be done.
Thankfully! The solution for FreeBSD looks doable without having to
keep NAT state like TPROXY does..
Adrian
sorry double post
just want to _Know_ how's th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Andrei V. Lavreniyuk said the following on 20.04.2007 12:27:
> Hi!
>
>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 12:37:08PM -0700, pete wright wrote:
ipfw2 (+ipv6) initialized, divert enabled, rule-based forwarding
enabled, default to deny, logging limited
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Andrei V. Lavreniyuk said the following on 20.04.2007 10:10:
> Hi!
>
>
>>> ipfw2 (+ipv6) initialized, divert enabled, rule-based forwarding enabled,
>>> default to deny, logging limited to 100 packets/entry by default
>>> ad0: 114473MB at ata0-mas
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 08:20:58PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> - --On Saturday, April 07, 2007 20:12:00 +0100 Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Also to add I now have a 2nd box using 6.2 STABLE few days old code,
> > had to use it because of broadcom 5755 nic card, I plan to use large
>
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 03:56:32AM +0100, Adrian Wontroba wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 02:08:48PM +, Adrian Wontroba wrote:
> > At work, amoungst my stable of old computers running FreeBSD, I have a
> > Fujitsu M800 - a 4 Zeon SMP processor with 4 GB of memory. This
> > primarily runs Nagio
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 04:14:23PM +0200, Christian Walther wrote:
> On 19/04/07, Kai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 12:53:32PM +0200, Kai wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello all,
> >>
> >> We're running into regular panics on our webserver after upgrading
> >> from 4.x to 6.2-stable:
> >
Hi,
Recently I have noticed that one of our Dell PE1950's has been crashing
a lot with the following reason "supervisor read, page not present".
The system runs 6.2 Release under i386.
I have attached 2 back traces, and I still have both cores if any more
information is required. Any light
Kai wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 04:14:23PM +0200, Christian Walther wrote:
On 19/04/07, Kai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 12:53:32PM +0200, Kai wrote:
Hello all,
We're running into regular panics on our webserver after upgrading
from 4.x to 6.2-stable:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Ganbold said the following on 23.04.2007 05:39:
> Beni wrote:
>> On Friday 20 April 2007 03:55:56 Ganbold wrote:
>>
>>> Michael Nottebrock wrote:
>>>
I forwarded my mail to gnome@ (the HAL maintainers) after sending it
and
Joe Ma
Hey guys,
Running 6.2-RELEASE-p3 and apache2.2.4. I'm trying to install mod_security2
from ports, and I'm getting the following error during the build
http://Schiz0.securityexploits.com/mod_security2.ports.compile.error
I've updated the ports database via csup within 24 hours of trying to
compi
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 02:33:29PM +0200, Kai wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 12:53:32PM +0200, Kai wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> We're running into regular panics on our webserver after upgrading
> from 4.x to 6.2-stable:
Hi Again,
The panics keep happening, so I'm trying alter
Check your PCRE package:
$ pkg_info -L pcre-6.6_1|grep -i pcre.c
/usr/local/man/man3/pcre_compile.3.gz
/usr/local/man/man3/pcre_compile2.3.gz
/usr/local/man/man3/pcre_config.3.gz
/usr/local/man/man3/pcre_copy_named_substring.3.gz
/usr/local/man/man3/pcre_copy_substring.3.gz
/usr/local/bin/pcre-con
On Monday, 23 April 2007 at 4:06:10 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 08:20:58PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > - --On Saturday, April 07, 2007 20:12:00 +0100 Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > Also to add I now have a 2nd box using 6.2 STABLE few days old code,
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 02:33:29PM +0200, Kai wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 12:53:32PM +0200, Kai wrote:
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> > We're running into regular panics on our webserver after upgrading
> > from 4.x to 6.2-stable:
>
Hi all,
To continue this story, a colleague wrote a small prog
Are you running i386 on this platform to keep your network platform
homogeneous. We run 6.2p2 on amd64 on the same hardware w/o issue.
That's an interesting ARP issue; are you using bce(4)? We prefer to
stack the machine with PCIe4x em(4) cards.
~BAS
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 13:24 +0100, Tom Ju
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 01:27:27PM +0100, Tom Judge wrote:
> Kai wrote:
> >On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 04:14:23PM +0200, Christian Walther wrote:
> >
> >>On 19/04/07, Kai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 12:53:32PM +0200, Kai wrote:
> >>>
> Hello all,
>
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 05:35:47PM +0200, Kai wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 02:33:29PM +0200, Kai wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 12:53:32PM +0200, Kai wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > We're running into regular panics on our webserver after upgrading
> > > from 4.x to 6.2-stable:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 01:24:52PM +0100, Tom Judge wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Recently I have noticed that one of our Dell PE1950's has been crashing
> a lot with the following reason "supervisor read, page not present".
>
> The system runs 6.2 Release under i386.
>
> I have attached 2 back traces, and
On 4/23/07, Schiz0 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey guys,
Running 6.2-RELEASE-p3 and apache2.2.4. I'm trying to install mod_security2
from ports, and I'm getting the following error during the build
http://Schiz0.securityexploits.com/mod_security2.ports.compile.error
I've updated the ports datab
Stephen Clark wrote:
[...]
If you could build custom boot images, try
http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/realbtx
realbtx.2.patch is the patch, and loader is the /boot/loader built
with that
patch applied. If you could rearrange CD image with that loader put into
/boot, then try to load from it and
Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 01:24:52PM +0100, Tom Judge wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Recently I have noticed that one of our Dell PE1950's has been crashing
>> a lot with the following reason "supervisor read, page not present".
>>
>> The system runs 6.2 Release under i386.
>>
>> I have
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 01:12:30PM -0400, Michael Proto wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 01:24:52PM +0100, Tom Judge wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Recently I have noticed that one of our Dell PE1950's has been crashing
> >> a lot with the following reason "supervisor read, pag
Michael Proto wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 01:24:52PM +0100, Tom Judge wrote:
Hi,
Recently I have noticed that one of our Dell PE1950's has been crashing
a lot with the following reason "supervisor read, page not present".
The system runs 6.2 Release under i386.
I ha
OK, now I am a bit stumped, so wanted to post here in hopes someone might
have an idea. First off the FBSD machine in question is an x86 server running
6.2-STABLE from a supped from a few weeks ago, so is fairly current.
I use said machine to handle all of my eMail and things in general seem to
On 4/23/07, Benno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/23/07, Schiz0 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Running 6.2-RELEASE-p3 and apache2.2.4. I'm trying to install
mod_security2
> from ports, and I'm getting the following error during the build
>
> http://Schiz0.securityexploits.com/mod_sec
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Ganbold said the following on 23.04.2007 05:39:
> > Beni wrote:
> >> On Friday 20 April 2007 03:55:56 Ganbold wrote:
> >>
> >>> Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> >>>
> I forwarded my mail to gnome@ (the HAL
> maintainers) after sending i
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:40:20 -0400
Howard Leadmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> OK, now I am a bit stumped, so wanted to post here in hopes someone
> might have an idea. First off the FBSD machine in question is an x86
> server running 6.2-STABLE from a supped from a few weeks ago, so is
> fair
30 matches
Mail list logo
