At 12:21 AM 4/20/2007, Gregory Shapiro wrote:
sendmail has been updated from version 8.13.8 to 8.14.1 in the HEAD and
RELENG_[456] branches. This upgrade includes a new libmilter library
which requires all dynamically linked milters to be recompiled (no
source code changes are required).
Unfort
Hello,
Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
On Apr 20, 2007, at 8:23 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Look closely at the dmesg line, note what device sio0 is claiming to be
associated with (acpi0, not isa0):
sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10
on acpi0
This is one of the dr
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007, Stefan Lambrev wrote:
[..]
> This did the trick:
>
> uart0: <16550 or compatible> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 on acpi0
> uart1: <16550 or compatible> port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on acpi0
>
> ports are swapped but this is probably because I swap them in bios, but
> this is ok.
+1
i'm using IPSec with out such limitations ...
fix it. than we will continue conversation about your CPU troubles
2007/4/20, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: - Скрыть цитируемый текст -
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 12:08:57PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 22:54:52 +040
Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
On Apr 20, 2007, at 8:23 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Look closely at the dmesg line, note what device sio0 is claiming to be
associated with (acpi0, not isa0):
sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags
0x10 on acpi0
This is one of the drawba
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 09:27 pm Andrei V. Lavreniyuk wrote:
>
> Adding to my report:
>
>
> Test 1:
>
> To start k3b with a disk in the device of reading/record. A start takes a
> place normally.
>
> Test 2:
>
> To start k3b without a disk in the device of reading/record. At a start the
> k3b system ha
On Friday 20 April 2007 03:55:56 Ganbold wrote:
> Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> > I forwarded my mail to gnome@ (the HAL maintainers) after sending it and
> > Joe Marcus Clarke from gnome@ had this to say on the issue:
> >
> > --- snip
> >
> > This should have been fixed a while ago by jylefort when
On Friday 20 April 2007 01:05:17 Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> I forwarded my mail to gnome@ (the HAL maintainers) after sending it and
> Joe Marcus Clarke from gnome@ had this to say on the issue:
>
> --- snip
>
> This should have been fixed a while ago by jylefort when he set the
> default device f
Hello!
I've upgraded one of my servers today.
Now it is
Asus P5p800-VM
Pentium D 3.0Ghz
4GB RAM (4x1 GB)
3WARE raid5
FreebSD 6.2 cvsed today compiled from sources.
after that i decided to try PAE. It runs just fine but
when i compare available memory with and without
pae i do not see any differ
Artem Kuchin wrote:
Apr 21 18:01:30 osiris kernel: CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 3.00GHz
(3000.33-MHz 686-class CPU)
Why bother with PAE on a CPU that is 64-bit capable and can run the
amd64 version of FreeBSD 6.2?
/Martin
___
freebsd-stable@freeb
> For those of us with RELENG_[456] servers do we just need to buildworld and
> installworld?
Yes, after the new code is committed (I'll post at that time).
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-
On Apr 21, 2007, at 1:07 AM, Stefan Lambrev wrote:
Some systems apparently tie the serial port to ACPI functionality
in a
different way. For example, I have a couple boxes which have sio0
attached to acpi0 that work fine. In some other cases, I have ones
which result in a non-working serial
At 12:42 PM 4/21/2007, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
ports are swapped but this is probably because I swap them in bios,
but this is ok.
Serial is working and now I can start working on the main problem :)
So it's not acpi problem, but instead problem with sio?
So it appears.
I have been using uar
Martin Nilsson wrote:
Artem Kuchin wrote:
Apr 21 18:01:30 osiris kernel: CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 3.00GHz
(3000.33-MHz 686-class CPU)
Why bother with PAE on a CPU that is 64-bit capable and can run the
amd64 version of FreeBSD 6.2?
Do you know a RELIABLE way to migrade a production ser
On 4/21/07, Artem Kuchin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello!
I've upgraded one of my servers today.
Now it is
Asus P5p800-VM
Pentium D 3.0Ghz
4GB RAM (4x1 GB)
3WARE raid5
FreebSD 6.2 cvsed today compiled from sources.
after that i decided to try PAE. It runs just fine but
when i compare availabl
Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
On 4/21/07, Artem Kuchin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello!
I've upgraded one of my servers today.
Now it is
Asus P5p800-VM
Pentium D 3.0Ghz
4GB RAM (4x1 GB)
3WARE raid5
FreebSD 6.2 cvsed today compiled from sources.
after that i decided to try PAE. It runs just fine b
On 4/22/07, Artem Kuchin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> On 4/21/07, Artem Kuchin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> I've upgraded one of my servers today.
>> Now it is
>> Asus P5p800-VM
>> Pentium D 3.0Ghz
>> 4GB RAM (4x1 GB)
>> 3WARE raid5
>>
>> FreebSD 6.2 cvsed t
Artem Kuchin wrote:
Hello!
I've upgraded one of my servers today.
Now it is
Asus P5p800-VM
Pentium D 3.0Ghz
4GB RAM (4x1 GB)
3WARE raid5
FreebSD 6.2 cvsed today compiled from sources.
after that i decided to try PAE. It runs just fine but
when i compare available memory with and without
pae i
18 matches
Mail list logo
