Hi!
> >ipfw2 (+ipv6) initialized, divert enabled, rule-based forwarding enabled,
> >default to deny, logging limited to 100 packets/entry by default
> >ad0: 114473MB at ata0-master UDMA100
> >acd0: DVDR at ata1-master UDMA33
> >ad4: 152627MB at ata2-master SATA150
> >acd0: FAILURE - INQUIRY IL
On 20/04/07, Andrei V. Lavreniyuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi!
> >ipfw2 (+ipv6) initialized, divert enabled, rule-based forwarding enabled,
> >default to deny, logging limited to 100 packets/entry by default
> >ad0: 114473MB at ata0-master UDMA100
> >acd0: DVDR at ata1-master UDMA33
> >ad4:
Hi!
# uname -a
FreeBSD datacenter.technica-03.local 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #0: Thu Apr
19 21:04:38 EEST 2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP-DATACENTER i386
console.log
Apr 19 21:48:01
(Before Apr 8 update, I built the world+kernel as of
2007.03.29.21.58.25 UTC.) I am running FreeBSD 6-STABLE as of
2007.04.08.19.20.49 UTC, with ath0 driver for Belkin "My Essentials"
Wireless G card, which I had been using without problems until now.
Some of current configuration is ...
device
Hi!
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 12:37:08PM -0700, pete wright wrote:
> > >ipfw2 (+ipv6) initialized, divert enabled, rule-based forwarding
> > > enabled, default to deny, logging limited to 100 packets/entry by
> > > default ad0: 114473MB at ata0-master
> > > UDMA100 acd0: DVDR at ata1-master
> >
I have the vmcore as well:
# kgdb -c vmcore.0 /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/THEBIGHONKER/kernel.debug
[GDB will not be able to debug user-mode threads: /usr/lib/libthread_db.so:
Unde
fined symbol "ps_pglobal_lookup"]
GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software,
"real" transparent proxy provided by Cisco's WCCP with, for example, Squid.
this protocol detects HTTP (and so on) traffic on any port and redirects it
to proxy-server.
same thing (not just permanent redirection of port 80 to proxy but
*DETECTING* HTTP traffic and proxying it) can be achived by Tr
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
wrote Parv thusly...
>
> (Before Apr 8 update, I built the world+kernel as of
> 2007.03.29.21.58.25 UTC.) I am running FreeBSD 6-STABLE as of
> 2007.04.08.19.20.49 UTC, with ath0 driver for Belkin "My
> Essentials" Wireless G card, which I had been using without
> pr
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 06:03:22PM +0300, Stefan Lambrev wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I have some problems with one of my servers and need serial to
> investigate more,
> unfortunately I have and problems with serial port too.
>
> from dmesg:
> sio0: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0
> si
Hello!
If I boot 6.2-RELEASE (from CD), I have USB Legacy support enabled
in BIOS and have the USB keyboard connected in the rear, the system
panics right after the line:
vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa-0xb on isa0
talking about ohci-something not listen to some address (sorry don't
Hi list,
I have some problems with one of my servers and need serial to
investigate more,
unfortunately I have and problems with serial port too.
from dmesg:
sio0: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0
sio0: port may not be enabled
sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff
On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 11:50 -0400, Sven Willenberger wrote:
> I currently have a FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p3 SMP with dual intel PRO/1000PM
> nics configured as follows:
>
> em0: flags=8943 mtu 1500
> options=b
> inet 192.168.0.18 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255
> eth
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 11:51:56AM -0400, Sven Willenberger wrote:
> Having done more diagnostics I have found out it is not CARP related at
> all. It turns out that the same timeouts will happen when ftp'ing to the
> physical address IPs as well. There is also an odd situation here
> depending on
On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 09:04 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 11:51:56AM -0400, Sven Willenberger wrote:
> > Having done more diagnostics I have found out it is not CARP related at
> > all. It turns out that the same timeouts will happen when ftp'ing to the
> > physical addres
- Original Message -
From: "Sven Willenberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jeremy Chadwick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 6:25 PM
Subject: Re: CARP and em0 timeout watchdog
On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 09:04 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 11:51:5
On Apr 20, 2007, at 8:23 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Look closely at the dmesg line, note what device sio0 is claiming
to be
associated with (acpi0, not isa0):
sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags
0x10 on acpi0
This is one of the drawbacks to using ACPI.
This
On 4/20/07, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 11:51:56AM -0400, Sven Willenberger wrote:
> Having done more diagnostics I have found out it is not CARP related at
> all. It turns out that the same timeouts will happen when ftp'ing to the
> physical address IPs as
On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 10:17 -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
> On 4/20/07, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 11:51:56AM -0400, Sven Willenberger wrote:
> > > Having done more diagnostics I have found out it is not CARP related at
> > > all. It turns out that the same ti
On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 18:46 +0200, Clayton Milos wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Sven Willenberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Jeremy Chadwick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc:
> Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 6:25 PM
> Subject: Re: CARP and em0 timeout watchdog
>
>
> > On Fri, 2007-04-20
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 09:45:43AM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>
> On Apr 20, 2007, at 8:23 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>
> >Look closely at the dmesg line, note what device sio0 is claiming
> >to be
> >associated with (acpi0, not isa0):
> >
> >>sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0
On Apr 20, 2007, at 11:08 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 09:45:43AM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
On Apr 20, 2007, at 8:23 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Look closely at the dmesg line, note what device sio0 is claiming
to be
associated with (acpi0, not isa0):
sio0: <1655
On 4/20/07, Sven Willenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 10:17 -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
> On 4/20/07, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 11:51:56AM -0400, Sven Willenberger wrote:
> > > Having done more diagnostics I have found out it is n
On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 11:27 -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
> On 4/20/07, Sven Willenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 10:17 -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
> > > On 4/20/07, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 11:51:56AM -0400, Sven Willenberger w
> Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 09:04:31 -0700
> From: Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 11:51:56AM -0400, Sven Willenberger wrote:
> > Having done more diagnostics I have found out it is not CARP related at
> > all. It turns out that the same tim
On 4/20/07, Brian McCann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/20/07, Jack Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/20/07, Sven Willenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 10:17 -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
> > > On 4/20/07, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Ap
kernel config please and /etc/sysctl.conf
2007/4/19, Alex Povolotsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello!
On the Pentium-D box, kernel detects both CPUs, but it seems like
scheduler use only one.
(from dmesg)
Copyright (c) 1992-2007 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 19
and what is this, i mean why:
WARNING: debug.mpsafenet forced to 0 as ipsec requires Giant
WARNING: MPSAFE network stack disabled, expect reduced performance.
2007/4/19, Alex Povolotsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello!
On the Pentium-D box, kernel detects both CPUs, but it seems like
scheduler use
On 4/20/07, Jack Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/20/07, Sven Willenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 10:17 -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
> > On 4/20/07, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 11:51:56AM -0400, Sven Willenberger wrote:
> >
> Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 22:54:52 +0400
> From: "Alexey Karagodov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> and what is this, i mean why:
> WARNING: debug.mpsafenet forced to 0 as ipsec requires Giant
> WARNING: MPSAFE network stack disabled, expect reduced performance.
I thought it wa
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 12:08:57PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 22:54:52 +0400
> > From: "Alexey Karagodov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > and what is this, i mean why:
> > WARNING: debug.mpsafenet forced to 0 as ipsec requires Giant
> > WARNING
Andrei V. Lavreniyuk wrote:
Hi!
# uname -a
FreeBSD datacenter.technica-03.local 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #0: Thu Apr
19 21:04:38 EEST 2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP-DATACENTER i386
console.log
-
> Unfortunately, this problem (the need to recompile filters) was found
> after the MFC. The release engineering team has asked for this notice
> instead of doing a full backout of sendmail 8.14 in the RELENG_[456]
> branches.
Note that I have some new code, currently under review, that eliminate
32 matches
Mail list logo
