100% repeatable crashes on 6.2-RELEASE-p3

Hello, I've got these repeatable crashes with: klon# uname -a FreeBSD klon.klsp.kharkov.ua 6.2-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p3 #7: Fri Mar 23 11:26:01 EET 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KLON i386 the system is running quagga and l2tpd built from the yesterday's ports. I

Re: 100% repeatable crashes on 6.2-RELEASE-p3 (bt full)

Gregory Edigarov wrote: Hello, I've got these repeatable crashes with: klon# uname -a FreeBSD klon.klsp.kharkov.ua 6.2-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p3 #7: Fri Mar 23 11:26:01 EET 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KLON i386 the system is running quagga and l2tpd built from the ye

Re: 100% repeatable crashes on 6.2-RELEASE-p3

On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 02:25:44PM +0200, Gregory Edigarov wrote: > Hello, > > I've got these repeatable crashes with: > > klon# uname -a > FreeBSD klon.klsp.kharkov.ua 6.2-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p3 #7: > Fri Mar 23 11:26:01 EET 2007 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KLON i

Re: another error with md malloc based fs

Michael Schuh wrote: > Chuck Swiger wrote: > > Michael Schuh wrote: > > > i can't understand how malloc can eat all available > > > memory, i have 2Gigs of it ;-) > > > so it seems to me i know what i doing, if > > > i have 1,6 Gigs free Memory, and i say ok get me 750Megs from > > > my 1,6

Re: 100% repeatable crashes on 6.2-RELEASE-p3

Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hello, > Not use kernel ppp, which is known to be broken. I don't know what > this means for your application. Sorry to hijack this thread but is there any way to mimic the following pppd invocation with mpd or ppp(8) : /usr/sbin/pppd 192.168.0.15:192.1

Re: another error with md malloc based fs

Oliver, Thanks for this excellent article. I was trying to write about the same thing, but keep it simple enough to improve the chances of it crossing the language barrier weel enough to be useful. I believe you did a really good job of this and saved me several minutes of tying to do the same. I

Re: another error with md malloc based fs

Kevin Oberman wrote: > I thought the warning in the man page was adequate (until 7.0 changes > the default to swap backed), but, at least in Michael's case, I guess I > was wrong. I guess the man page need to somehow make it clear that the > memory used by malloc backed mds is a very limited re

Re: another error with md malloc based fs

Hi Oliver, Hi @list, yes that's exatly what i have in my mind, after the explainings from Chuck. thanks very much cheers michael 2007/3/23, Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Michael Schuh wrote: > Chuck Swiger wrote: > > Michael Schuh wrote: > > > i can't understand how malloc can eat all

installation issue 6.2 AMD64-bit 3ware 9550SX

I am trying to install FreeBSD-stable 6.2 64-bit from CDROM and the installation hangs. The installation hangs after the 3ware 9000 Series Storage Controller is recognized (using the twa0 driver). If I disable ACPI, I get to the sysinstall screen, however, no hard drives are detected. Here is a li

Re: installation issue 6.2 AMD64-bit 3ware 9550SX

Jon, This issue should be fixed in the FreeBSD 6.X driver on the 3ware web-site (9.4.1 codeset). We need to send a kernel patch to update the in-kernel 6.X driver to the latest version. -Adam On 3/23/07, Jon Langton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am trying to install FreeBSD-stable 6.2 64-bit f

RE: Amd64 Unstable Areca

Hello... El vie, 23-03-2007 a las 11:12 +1100, Jan Mikkelsen escribió: > Hi, > > Phillip Neumann wrote: > > My amd64 box is not very stable. > > In its hardware list, you can see there is an areca 1210 card, wich > > suffer the errata of 6.2-release (high load crash) > > > > Last week or so, i

Re: Amd64 Unstable Areca

A newer version of the driver has been release to fix this problem (I think): http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/arcmsr/ If that doesn't work move back down to 1.20.00.12: http://www.nbritton.org/uploads/areca/ Added erich and scott to the cc list. On 3/22/07, Phillip Neumann <[

Re: Xen Dom0, are we making progress?

On 3/13/07, Kip Macy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I know you were working on Xen support in FreeBSD, but web about it > (http://www.fsmware.com/xenofreebsd/7.0/STATUS) has one year old info > (support planned in FreeBSD 6.1). So is there any progress, or Xen will > not be in any near future relea

Re: Xen Dom0, are we making progress?

- "Nikolas Britton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What about implementing something like DragonFly BSD virtual kernels? > Matthew Dillon talks about it in is bsdtalk interview: > http://cisx1.uma.maine.edu/~wbackman/bsdtalk/bsdtalk098.mp3 It seems very similar to User Mode Linux, rather than