Re: interface re0

Hi, >From the keyboard of Tom Samplonius, written on Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at >08:56:57PM -0700: > > re0: port > > 0xb800-0xb8ff mem 0xf700-0xf7ff irq 11 at device 15.0 on pci0 > > re0: MII without any phy! > > device_attach: re0 attach returned 6 > > > > Does anybody have an idea how this

Re: Possible memory leak?

On Tuesday 20 March 2007 10:44:07 Oliver Fromme wrote: > Stefan Ehmann wrote: > > Sometimes I'm noticing very high memory usage. Nearly my whole memory > > (1GB) is used although I'm running my usual set of processes - normally > > memory usage is much lower. > > That's normal. FreeBSD uses nea

Re: interface re0

Tom Samplonius wrote: > But em cards (Intel Pro1000GT Desktop) cards are very cheap, and > do work. Why buy RealTek? RealTek has been outputting overly > simplistic hardware since the beginning. If there was a corner > that could be cut when building a NIC, a RealTek engineer thought

I have a serious problem

While some days my FreeBSD (6.2-STABLE) reboots without any reason for this .. block the system for 10-20 seconds and then reboots.. please if you know something about this to help me :( thanks in advance ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http

Re: I have a serious problem

On 21/03/07, ExTaZyTi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: While some days my FreeBSD (6.2-STABLE) reboots without any reason for this .. block the system for 10-20 seconds and then reboots.. please if you know something about this to help me :( Since we're not aware of your setup, it would be quite hel

Re: I have a serious problem

ExTaZyTi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > While some days my FreeBSD (6.2-STABLE) reboots without any reason for this > .. > block the system for 10-20 seconds and then reboots.. That sounds like your system panics while you're running X, so you cannot see the panic message. By default, the system

Re: zdump on amd64

on 19/03/2007 16:15 Andriy Gapon said the following: > Strange problem: > $ uname -srm > FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p2 amd64 > > $ zdump -v EST > EST Sun Jan 26 08:29:52 -219 UTC = Sun Jan 26 03:29:52 -219 EST isdst=0 > gmtoff=-18000 > EST Mon Jan 27 08:29:52 -219 UTC = Mon Jan 27 03:29:52 -219 EST isd

[releng_6 tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

TB --- 2007-03-21 17:03:57 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2007-03-21 17:03:57 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2007-03-21 17:03:57 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2007-03-21 17:04:34 - checking out the source tree TB --- 2007-03-21 17:04:34 - cd

Re: I have a serious problem

Thanks. My system configuration is intel p3 866 MHz, 192 MB RAM, 20 GB HDD using i386. The FreeBSD is in the another PC without X. This is my custom kernel config file: # # GENERIC -- Generic kernel configuration file for FreeBSD/i386 # # For more information on this file, please read the handboo

[releng_6 tinderbox] failure on alpha/alpha

TB --- 2007-03-21 16:35:03 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2007-03-21 16:35:03 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for alpha/alpha TB --- 2007-03-21 16:35:03 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2007-03-21 16:35:34 - checking out the source tree TB --- 2007-03-21 16:35:34 - cd

[releng_6 tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

TB --- 2007-03-21 17:34:52 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2007-03-21 17:34:52 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2007-03-21 17:34:52 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2007-03-21 17:35:24 - checking out the source tree TB --- 2007-03-21 17:35:24 - cd /

ACL's doesn't work with SUIDDIR

Hi all, I'm using FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE, with suiddir set as option in kernel config and fstab (+ acl support). My goal is to have a directory (precisely a SVN repo) writable by X specific users, where all created/modified files remain owned by svn. I know that's not the only way to do it - but I ha

[releng_6 tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

TB --- 2007-03-21 18:04:30 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2007-03-21 18:04:30 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2007-03-21 18:04:30 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2007-03-21 18:05:00 - checking out the source tree TB --- 2007-03-21 18:05:00 - cd /

[releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

TB --- 2007-03-21 18:35:12 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2007-03-21 18:35:12 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2007-03-21 18:35:12 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2007-03-21 18:35:43 - checking out the source tree TB --- 2007-03-21 18:35:43

Re: Daily Panics on 6.2-STABLE (page fault/Fatal trap 12)

On Tue, Feb 20, 2007, at 22:14:50 -0600, Mark Kane wrote: > Hi everyone. > > I'm getting kernel panics daily or even multiple times a day on a new > machine. When it's running everything works well, but over the last > day or two I've been getting multiple panics per day at seemingly > random time

Re: zdump on amd64

Andriy Gapon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Strange problem: > $ uname -srm > FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p2 amd64 > > $ zdump -v EST > EST Sun Jan 26 08:29:52 -219 UTC = Sun Jan 26 03:29:52 -219 EST isdst=0 > gmtoff=-18000 > EST Mon Jan 27 08:29:52 -219 UTC = Mon Jan 27 03:29:52 -219 EST isdst=0 > gmtoff

zfs on FreeBSD

Hi. Probably a bit premature but has anyone used zfs on FreeBSD "without problems". The reason I ask is that I have installed Solaris 10 on an intel-box, but adding additional programs is *not* as easy as 'portinstall postfix' etc. on FreeBSD. So rather than doing sensible work I feel like an idi

Re: zfs on FreeBSD

On Mar 21, 2007, at 1:31 PM, Claus Guttesen wrote: Hi. Probably a bit premature but has anyone used zfs on FreeBSD "without problems". The reason I ask is that I have installed Solaris 10 on an intel-box, but adding additional programs is *not* as easy as 'portinstall postfix' etc. on FreeBSD. S

Re: zfs on FreeBSD

On 21/03/07, Claus Guttesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi. Probably a bit premature but has anyone used zfs on FreeBSD "without problems". The reason I ask is that I have installed Solaris 10 on an intel-box, but adding additional programs is *not* as easy as 'portinstall postfix' etc. on FreeBS

Re: zfs on FreeBSD

On Wednesday 21 March 2007 01:49 pm, Christian Walther wrote: > On 21/03/07, Claus Guttesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Probably a bit premature but has anyone used zfs on FreeBSD "without > > problems". The reason I ask is that I have installed Solaris 10 on an > > intel-box, but adding additio

Re: zfs on FreeBSD

> > Probably a bit premature but has anyone used zfs on FreeBSD "without > > problems". The reason I ask is that I have installed Solaris 10 on an > > intel-box, but adding additional programs is *not* as easy as > > 'portinstall postfix' etc. on FreeBSD. So rather than doing sensible > > work I f

Re: [PATCH] bge(4) patch for -STABLE

On Friday 16 March 2007 02:30 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > I have made bge(4) patch for -STABLE (sorry, not suitable for > RELENG_6_2): > > http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/bge_releng6.diff > > I received few success reports but I need wider testing because > changes are too big and there are two many B

6.2-amd64-unionfs6-p17: compilation error

Greetz Daichi, List! I had a clean 6.2p2 src and I encounter error in compiling unionfs6-p17. amdtest# uname -a FreeBSD amdtest. 6.2-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p2 #0: Thu Mar 1 16:56:53 PHT 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ELAN amd64 amdtest# cd /usr/src/