Hi,
> On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 08:53:32 +0100
> Willy Offermans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Willy> If I load the tap kernel_module, then it is quite obvious that I want to
use the tap
Willy> device. Why should I perform `cp /dev/null /dev/tap0` to create tap0.
Because, the tap is a pseudo inte
Hi,
One of our fileservers deadlocked, again. It is running RELENG_6 from
2006-11-14 and was running dump(8) -L on a 11% filled 400GB UFS2
volume. It is hanging for 3h hours now, and there is no disk activity.
# ps axl | grep snap
046 0 1 -4 0 0 8 snaplk DL?? 98:58.8
Václav Haisman wrote:
> Willy Offermans wrote:
> > The following error appears regularly on my FreeBSD 6.2 server called
> > sun. The frequency of appearance is higher than on FreeBSD 6.1, where I
> > had this error from time to time. The error is not critical, since a
> > new instance of the
since some time now it seems ipfw starts first of all, I think that is not
correct
rcorder: file `/etc/rc.d/ipfw' is before unknown provision `NETWORKING'
rcorder: requirement `ppp' in file `/etc/rc.d/ipfw' has no providers.
/etc/rc.d/ipfw
I changed the order for my needs but it might be a goo
Check your computer RAM with memtest86+ and change NIC.
I already replaced one xl0 card which was IMO unstable. And now
I have 2 network cards (it's a rouer) and one internal. So do I have
to replace both cards? And what if internal network card is buggy?
I'm screwed?
Good idea about "memtest86
Hi!
I've followed the thread "don't buy ati products" not very closely
but one thing comes to mind:
Years ago we've had a lot of card / chip manufacturers on the
market. When thinking about this currently really just two chip
manufacturers are coming into my mind. This is bad.
It's probably a cr
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 09:21:13AM +0100, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> One of our fileservers deadlocked, again. It is running RELENG_6 from
> 2006-11-14 and was running dump(8) -L on a 11% filled 400GB UFS2
> volume. It is hanging for 3h hours now, and there is no disk activity.
>
> # ps ax
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 11:22:00AM +0100, Volker wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've followed the thread "don't buy ati products" not very closely
> but one thing comes to mind:
>
> Years ago we've had a lot of card / chip manufacturers on the
> market. When thinking about this currently really just two chip
>
> I've followed the thread "don't buy ati products" not very closely
> but one thing comes to mind:
> It's probably a crazy idea but what about an open source graphics card?
> There are similar projects already like OsCar so the idea of open
> source hardware development is not really new but proba
JoaoBR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> since some time now it seems ipfw starts first of all, I think that is not
> correct
No, it starts after networking is up, which is the correct
behaviour, I think.
> rcorder: file `/etc/rc.d/ipfw' is before unknown provision `NETWORKING'
> rcorder: require
Ralf,
On 03/16/07 11:38, Ralf Folkerts wrote:
...
> there's the "Open Graphics Project"
>
> http://wiki.duskglow.com/tiki-index.php?page=AboutOpenGraphics
>
> Unfortunately I haven't heard much news from them for quite a while now :-(
> So I'm not sure if the Project "stalled".
I haven't been
Hi Volker,
[...]
> It's probably a crazy idea but what about an open source graphics card?
>
> There are similar projects already like OsCar so the idea of open
> source hardware development is not really new but probably exciting.
> Aren't there any hw devs reading and motivated?
[...]
there's
Note: This is off-topic on the -stable list, so it should
better go to the -chat list.
Volker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've followed the thread "don't buy ati products" not very closely
> but one thing comes to mind:
>
> Years ago we've had a lot of card / chip manufacturers on the
> ma
Oleg Gritsak wrote:
> I'm 99% sure, that open source principle is suitable only for software dev.
> And OS car is a crappiest idea of all. Production (and research) requires
> very expensive equipment. Fullstop. Nothing else can be said here, I think.
Well, there are several open-source proces
On Friday 16 March 2007 07:51, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> JoaoBR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > since some time now it seems ipfw starts first of all, I think that is
> > not correct
>
> No, it starts after networking is up, which is the correct
> behaviour, I think.
it should
>
> > rcorder: file
JoaoBR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 16 March 2007 07:51, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > JoaoBR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > since some time now it seems ipfw starts first of all, I think that is
> > > not correct
> >
> > No, it starts after networking is up, which is the correct
> >
Emile Coetzee wrote:
Okay I finally have a ktrace of the offending process. You can view it here:
http://www.clarotech.co.za/dump/openvpn2.txt
Thanks for this. If this is the correct trace, of the correct process,
then it looks like OpenVPN is hanging immediately on opening the tap device.
Volker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's probably a crazy idea but what about an open source graphics card?
It's been done:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Graphics_Project
http://wiki.duskglow.com/tiki-index.php?page=Open-Graphics
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
On Friday 16 March 2007 08:52, Oliver Fromme wrote:
>
> > > > rcorder: file `/etc/rc.d/ipfw' is before unknown provision
> > > > `NETWORKING' rcorder: requirement `ppp' in file `/etc/rc.d/ipfw' has
> > > > no providers.
> > >
> > > That sounds like you have accidentally deleted the files
> >
Sohgo Takeuchi wrote:
> I found some typos in the document of
> FreeBSD-EN-07:05.freebsd-update.
Thanks, I'll upload a fixed advisory to the web server.
> - src/UPDATING 1.416.2.29.2.5
> - src/sys/conf/newvers.sh 1.69
Hi,
I just fixed those issues with the port.
Thanks for reporting !
Martin Blapp, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
ImproWare AG, UNIXSP & ISP, Zurlindenstrasse 29, 4133 Pratteln, CH
Phone: +41 61 826 93 00 Fax: +41 61 82
(reposting since this involves 6-stable)
I'm investigating a problem where a pretty much stock 6.2 SMP kernel
randomly hangs on multiple Supermicro X7DBR-i+ and X7DBR-8+ systems. The
system syncs the filesystems and prints "Uptime: ...", then hangs.
So far, I've narrowed it down to the MOD_SH
JoaoBR wrote:
I don't agree to what you say
what sense does it make to have my forward rules up but natd still not?
what sense does it makes logging while syslog is not up?
What would it forward & log when network isn't up?
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.
Erik Trulsson wrote:
You are not the first to have this idea.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Graphics_Project for information
about one actual attempt to make such a card.
I think one of the major problems lies here:
"""
It is hoped that this prototype will attract enough interest to
Hello,
Since raid degradation I have had corrupted swap partition and unable to
boot the kernel.
After detecting HDD I have "Fatal trap 12: page fault ..." and "current
process 0 (swapper)".
This happens even when I boot from CD. If HDD is disconnected it boots
normally.
I have tried to disab
Hi all.
I have a server with FreeBSD 6.1 and i try to install tomcat. But the tomcat
daemon can't run. And the error is
2007/03/17 0:47:27 org.apache.catalina.core.StandardServer await
致命的: StandardServer.await: create[8005]:
java.net.BindException: Can't assign requested address
at jav
> I have a server with FreeBSD 6.1 and i try to install tomcat. But the tomcat
> daemon can't run. And the error is
What version of Java did you install ?
-ete.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freeb
Steven Hartland wrote:
The current version of hptmv in the source tree is very
old now v1.12 (2005-06) vs current v1.14 (2006-3) and
it contains some really nasty bugs. We've been running
the latest version available from HighPoint + some
additional fixes, to ensure multi card installs dont
corru
On 3/16/07, Huynh Van Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all.
I have a server with FreeBSD 6.1 and i try to install tomcat. But the tomcat
daemon can't run. And the error is
2007/03/17 0:47:27 org.apache.catalina.core.StandardServer await
致命的: StandardServer.await: create[8005]:
java.net.BindE
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 05:48:27PM +0200, Krassimir Slavchev wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Since raid degradation I have had corrupted swap partition and unable to
> boot the kernel.
> After detecting HDD I have "Fatal trap 12: page fault ..." and "current
> process 0 (swapper)".
> This happens even when
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 05:48:27PM +0200, Krassimir Slavchev wrote:
Hello,
Since raid degradation I have had corrupted swap partition and unable to
boot the kernel.
After detecting HDD I have "Fatal trap 12: page fault ..." and "current
process 0 (swapper)".
This happe
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 07:05:21PM +0200, Krassimir Slavchev wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 05:48:27PM +0200, Krassimir Slavchev wrote:
> >
> >>Hello,
> >>
> >>Since raid degradation I have had corrupted swap partition and unable to
> >>boot the kernel.
> >>After detect
I have made bge(4) patch for -STABLE (sorry, not suitable for
RELENG_6_2):
http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/bge_releng6.diff
I received few success reports but I need wider testing because
changes are too big and there are two many BCM57xx variants out
there. If it breaks anything, please let
At 02:30 PM 3/16/2007, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
I have made bge(4) patch for -STABLE (sorry, not suitable for
RELENG_6_2):
http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/bge_releng6.diff
I received few success reports but I need wider testing because
changes are too big and there are two many BCM57xx variants out
t
On Friday 16 March 2007 02:46 pm, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> At 02:30 PM 3/16/2007, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> >I have made bge(4) patch for -STABLE (sorry, not suitable for
> >RELENG_6_2):
> >
> >http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/bge_releng6.diff
> >
> >I received few success reports but I need wider testing be
On Friday 16 March 2007 10:40, Pertti Kosunen wrote:
> JoaoBR wrote:
> > I don't agree to what you say
> > what sense does it make to have my forward rules up but natd still not?
> > what sense does it makes logging while syslog is not up?
>
> What would it forward & log when network isn't up?
ma
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 06:00:30PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
> man, starting ipfw after network does not mean that the network is not up
Okay, imagine this order:
1) Kernel starts
2) Network driver is loaded
3) Link is brought up
4) Interface is configured for IP (manually or via DHCP)
5) Firewall rul
Hi,
> I recommend that you have a look at dovecot.
Yeah, and consider maildir instead of mbox.
Have a great weekend.
Robert
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any m
> Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 15:40:44 +0200
> From: Pertti Kosunen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> JoaoBR wrote:
> > I don't agree to what you say
> > what sense does it make to have my forward rules up but natd still not?
> > what sense does it makes logging while syslog is not up
On Friday 16 March 2007 18:50, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 06:00:30PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
> > man, starting ipfw after network does not mean that the network is not up
>
> Okay, imagine this order:
>
> 1) Kernel starts
> 2) Network driver is loaded
> 3) Link is brought up
> 4)
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 08:33:01PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
> On Friday 16 March 2007 18:50, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > Okay, imagine this order:
> >
> > 1) Kernel starts
> > 2) Network driver is loaded
> > 3) Link is brought up
> > 4) Interface is configured for IP (manually or via DHCP)
> > 5) Firewa
>What version of Java did you install ?
>
I use the jdk 1.5.0 p3.
chunglien:~% pkg_info | grep jdk-1.5
jdk-1.5.0p3 Java Development Kit 1.5.0
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
T
Hi Tom Evans
Below is my sockstat result. But I can't find the port which tomcat
use(8180,8009,8005)
chunglien:/usr/local/apache-tomcat6.0/conf% sockstat -l -4
USER COMMANDPID FD PROTO LOCAL ADDRESS FOREIGN ADDRESS
dovecot imap-login 40265 0 tcp4 *:143
Hi Pietro Cerutti
Thank you a lot. Tomcat 6.0 can run with this option:
tomcat60_java_opts="-Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true"
Huynh Van Chung
Pietro Cerutti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote*:
>
On 3/16/07, Huynh Van Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi all.
>>
>> I have a server with FreeBSD 6.1 and
I just replaced my Dell E1505's Intel 3945ABG wireless card with an
Atheros AR5006EX card that I purchased from a person in Hong Kong and I
live in the USA. The card works great under Windows but when ath0 starts
up in FreeBSD, it gets the following errors which renders the card
useless until I res
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 08:33:01PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
> > On Friday 16 March 2007 18:50, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > > Okay, imagine this order:
> > >
> > > 1) Kernel starts
> > > 2) Network driver is loaded
> > > 3) Link is brought up
> > > 4) Interface is configured for IP (manually or via DH
46 matches
Mail list logo
