Re: Deadlock with gjournal installed on 6.2.

Václav Haisman wrote: > Hi, > I have experimentally installed PJD's GEOM Journal patch on 6.2. It seems to > work except that I got deadlock tonight, probably during periodic snapshot. > Post mortem ps output is attached. Definitely repeatable, tonight it locked up again. -- VH signature.asc De

PCMCIA regression in FBSD 6.1 -> 6.2 (RTL8169S/8110S)

Hello, i have PCMCIA Repotec Gigabit Ethernet Cardbus ethernet card. In FreeBSD 6.1 (up to 6.1-p9) it was working OK (Notebook Asus A3Fc). Under FreeBSD 6.2 it's impossible to get it working. Anybody could help me with solution, please? Under FreeBSD 6.1: ---

March 2007 Monthly Snapshots...

Just a note to say the March 2007 Monthly Snapshots for HEAD and RELENG_6 are done and available at: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/200703/ Checksums: MD5 (6.2-STABLE-200703-amd64-bootonly.iso) = 1c69b9a4026f2ab4f4a502faaa7122e2 MD5 (6.2-STABLE-200703-amd64-disc1.iso) = 1194716a6

Re: Call for Testers: ncurses 5.6 update

Rong-en Fan wrote: Hi folks, ncurses in 6.x is pretty old. We have update-to-date ncurses in 7.x with wide character support now. The patch at http://people.freebsd.org/~rafan/ncurses/ncursesw-5.6-all-fbsd6-20070310.diff.gz gives you ncurses 5.6 and wide character support in 6.x. Please a

Re: Fixit cd for AMD64 on 6.2-RELEASE problem?

"Steven Hartland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm currently trying to use the Fixit cd on AMD64 ( 6.2 ) > and it appears it has issues. When trying to fsck a > disk it reports: > fsck: exec fsck_4.2bsd for in /sbin:/usr/sbin: No such file or directory > > When looking on the mounted volumes

Re: Problems installing JDK 1.5

We've seen JVM lockups during high contention Threading operations with the jdk15 port. The same code succeeded when running under diablo-jdk. I have precious little information on the details of the failure we saw so I'm hesitant to toss the jdk15 port squarely under the bus without more poki

Re: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2

Hi, [snip patch] Does this patch make the libmap.conf hack unneeded? I frist thought so, but no, the more threads are running concurrently the slower libpthreads behaves, as it gets more lock contention. Until this is addressed somehow, use libthr.so -- Martin _

Re: Call for Testers: ncurses 5.6 update

ke -f Makefile.inc1 install32 mkdir -p /usr/lib32 # XXX add to mtree [...] Sorry about this. I messed up the lib32 changes in the all-in-one patch. Could you please use this one instead? http://people.freebsd.org/~rafan/ncurses/ncursesw-5.6-all-fbsd6-20070312.diff.gz It should

Re: Call for Testers: ncurses 5.6 update

c; /usr/obj/usr/src/make.amd64/make -f Makefile.inc1 install32 mkdir -p /usr/lib32 # XXX add to mtree [...] Sorry about this. I messed up the lib32 changes in the all-in-one patch. Could you please use this one instead? http://people.freebsd.org/~rafan/ncurses/ncursesw-5.6-

Re: Call for Testers: ncurses 5.6 update

cd /usr/src; /usr/obj/usr/src/make.amd64/make -f Makefile.inc1 install32 >> mkdir -p /usr/lib32 # XXX add to mtree > [...] > > Sorry about this. I messed up the lib32 changes in the all-in-one patch. > Could you please use this one instead? > > http://pe

Re: Call for Testers: ncurses 5.6 update

On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 08:56:27PM +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote: > Hi folks, > > ncurses in 6.x is pretty old. We have update-to-date ncurses in 7.x > with wide character support now. The patch at > > http://people.freebsd.org/~rafan/ncurses/ncursesw-5.6-all-fbsd6-20070310.diff.gz > > gives you ncur

Re: Xen Dom0, are we making progress?

Free Solaris DVD software kits (Free shipping too): http://www.sun.com/solaris/freemedia Sweet! On 3/12/07, Nikolas Britton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is FreeBSD making any progress in Xen Dom0 / Intel VT support? I'd really like to consolidate some underutilized FreeBSD servers. Are their an

Xen Dom0, are we making progress?

Is FreeBSD making any progress in Xen Dom0 / Intel VT support? I'd really like to consolidate some underutilized FreeBSD servers. Are their any alternative solutions that will enable me to do this kind of stuff with FreeBSD, or would it be better to go with Solaris Dom0 + FreeBSD DomU? ___

Re: Xen Dom0, are we making progress?

On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 20:16:32 +0100, Nikolas Britton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is FreeBSD making any progress in Xen Dom0 / Intel VT support? I'd really like to consolidate some underutilized FreeBSD servers. Are their any alternative solutions that will enable me to do this kind of stuff with

Re: Xen Dom0, are we making progress?

Nikolas Britton wrote: > Free Solaris DVD software kits (Free shipping too): > > http://www.sun.com/solaris/freemedia Or NetBSD: http://www.netbsd.org/Ports/xen/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Xen Dom0, are we making progress?

On 3/12/07, Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Nikolas Britton wrote: > Free Solaris DVD software kits (Free shipping too): > > http://www.sun.com/solaris/freemedia Or NetBSD: http://www.netbsd.org/Ports/xen/ Yes that was my next choice after FreeBSD but they don't support the Areca RAID c

Re: Another newbie question, about makefile options

Roland Smith wrote: On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 08:28:45PM +0100, Daniel Mouritsen wrote: So my question is, should i pass the makefile options only when running "make" to compile the program (that would make sence wouldnt it?) or should i use them everytime i run make as in both when doing "make" a

Re: Xen Dom0, are we making progress?

On 3/12/07, Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Nikolas Britton wrote: > Free Solaris DVD software kits (Free shipping too): > > http://www.sun.com/solaris/freemedia Or NetBSD: http://www.netbsd.org/Ports/xen/ Heh, you're still confused about what list your on. __

Re: Problems installing JDK 1.5

Stefan Walter wrote: Hi, Bill Smith, 06.03.07, 18:25h CET: I have been having problems with this as well, I have the linprocfs mounted, but the buil is dying with the following error: ../../../src/share/classes/sun/net/www/protocol/http/HttpURLConnection.java:1186 : warning: no

Re: Xen Dom0, are we making progress?

On Mar 12, 2007, at 4:34 PM, Nikolas Britton wrote: What I'd really love to do is split up each service (httpd, postgres, samba/nfs, ldap/nis, asterisk, etc.) into discrete virtual machines. It's too much work trying to make them all play nice on one system, This is the purpose for which we

Re: Xen Dom0, are we making progress?

Nikolas Britton wrote: On 3/12/07, Ronald Klop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 20:16:32 +0100, Nikolas Britton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is FreeBSD making any progress in Xen Dom0 / Intel VT support? I'd > really like to consolidate some underutilized FreeBSD servers. Are > th

Re: Xen Dom0, are we making progress?

On 3/12/07, Ronald Klop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 20:16:32 +0100, Nikolas Britton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is FreeBSD making any progress in Xen Dom0 / Intel VT support? I'd > really like to consolidate some underutilized FreeBSD servers. Are > their any alternative solu

Thread Hijacking (was Re: Is SATA II supported in 6.2-stable?)

in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, wrote Artem Kuchin thusly... (something about SATA in IPMI thread, and previously, something about IPMI in USB thread) Artem, Could you please stop hijacking threads? If you need to start a new thread, then please do not reply to a message of unrelated topic; st

Re: Problem with portupgrade

On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 10:06:23 -0500 Jonathan Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not sure if the issue was resolved but, I did find this link that > worked for me. > http://www.512kbps.com/2007/03/02/ports-portupgrade-af-failing%E2%80%A6/ >

Re: Xorg and ATI card query.

On Tuesday 13 March 2007 05:10, Yann Golanski wrote: > I have an ATI Radeon X1950 Sapphire and I am trying to get X/FreeBSD > working with it. My system is a clean install of FreBSD. I've managed to > get VESA to "work" but cannot get much more than that. There is no open source support for thi

Re: Xen Dom0, are we making progress?

On 3/12/07, Andras Gót <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Nikolas Britton wrote: > On 3/12/07, Ronald Klop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 20:16:32 +0100, Nikolas Britton >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > Is FreeBSD making any progress in Xen Dom0 / Intel VT support? I'd >> > really

6.1 to 6.2

Hello. I just spent a few hours trying to upgrade my 6.1 FreeBSD to 6.2 FreeBSD. This is on an UltraSparc 5 machine. The 6.1 install is intact on disk0 and still works fine. I copied my ipfilter and ipnat config files to the new system after building an ipf/ipnat enabled kernel on the 6.2 insta

Re: Xorg and ATI card query.

Daniel O'Connor writes: | On Tuesday 13 March 2007 05:10, Yann Golanski wrote: | > I have an ATI Radeon X1950 Sapphire and I am trying to get X/FreeBSD | > working with it. My system is a clean install of FreBSD. I've managed to | > get VESA to "work" but cannot get much more than that. | | The