Re: dd as an imaging solution.

2007-02-06 Thread Sean Bryant
Antony Mawer wrote: On 6/02/2007 1:47 PM, Sean Bryant wrote: Dominic Marks wrote: Check out G4U (NetBSD based) The only problem I can see here is that multiple parallel reads will have serious performance impacts, thus greatly increasing the cloning of the disk. The solution with dd, tee

Highpoint RocketRaid 2320 problems

2007-02-06 Thread Daniel Eriksson
I have a FreeBSD 6.2 (RELENG_6_2) box with a RocketRaid 2320 card (8 port SATA-2, PCI-E 4x). Attached to the 2320 card are two 500GB drives (Samsung) in a RAID-0 array. The system runs off of a 320GB drive hooked up to the motherboard. When stressing the RAID-0 array (multiple processes doing rea

Treo 650 not correctly seen by uvisor/ucom

2007-02-06 Thread Bruce M Simpson
Hi, I've attached udesc_dump output. Scanning uvisor.c and ucom.c I see no obvious reason why this shouldn't work; the Treo 650 has the same ident as the Zire 31. I can hotsync FreeBSD via Bluetooth, so this isn't a major worry, but it would be good to have backup via wires. Any ideas? Re

Filesystem corruption and bad perfomance with SRCS16 and PAE (raid 5 2TB)

2007-02-06 Thread Artem Kuchin
Hello! I've got an Intel 2400A server to install FBSD. It has 4GB RAM, SRCS16 raid controller, configured 2TB (actually a little less, about 1.9TB) RAID-5 array, Xeon 3.2Ghz Recently i have installed 6.2-R, cvsupped it to 6.2-STABLE (today, thanks to included csup utility, very convinient) a

Re: Filesystem corruption and bad perfomance with SRCS16 and PAE (raid 5 2TB)

2007-02-06 Thread Andras Gót
Hi, Can you try the AMD64 version on that server? Regards, Andras Artem Kuchin wrote: Hello! I've got an Intel 2400A server to install FBSD. It has 4GB RAM, SRCS16 raid controller, configured 2TB (actually a little less, about 1.9TB) RAID-5 array, Xeon 3.2Ghz Recently i have installed 6

Re: Filesystem corruption and bad perfomance with SRCS16 and PAE (raid 5 2TB)

2007-02-06 Thread Artem Kuchin
Andras Gót wrote: Hi, Can you try the AMD64 version on that server? Um.. i have never tried anything AMD in my life. I thought AMD64 is only for AMD CPUs and this is Intel Xeon. Are you really suggesting installing FreeBSD for AMD64 on this Xeon server? Why? Should it help? -- Artem Arte

Re: Filesystem corruption and bad perfomance with SRCS16 and PAE ( raid 5 2TB)

2007-02-06 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Wednesday 07 February 2007 10:34, Artem Kuchin wrote: > > Can you try the AMD64 version on that server? > > Um.. i have never tried anything AMD in my life. I thought Your loss.. > AMD64 is only for AMD CPUs and this is Intel Xeon. > Are you really suggesting installing FreeBSD for AMD64 > on

Re: dd as an imaging solution.

2007-02-06 Thread John-Mark Gurney
Antony Mawer wrote this message on Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 17:04 +1100: > On 6/02/2007 1:47 PM, Sean Bryant wrote: > >Dominic Marks wrote: > >>Check out G4U (NetBSD based) > > > >The only problem I can see here is that multiple parallel reads will > >have serious performance impacts, thus greatly inc

Re: Filesystem corruption and bad perfomance with SRCS16 and PAE (raid 5 2TB)

2007-02-06 Thread Boris Samorodov
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 03:04:05 +0300 Artem Kuchin wrote: > Andras Gót wrote: > > Can you try the AMD64 version on that server? > Um.. i have never tried anything AMD in my life. I thought > AMD64 is only for AMD CPUs and this is Intel Xeon. > Are you really suggesting installing FreeBSD for AMD64 >