Hello,
James Long wrote:
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 12:02:52 +
From: Pete French <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: impossible rc.d ordering problem with stf and pf ?
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
1
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 02:24:35AM -0500, Michael R. Wayne wrote:
> We have a nubmer of similar machines that were initiallly formated
> with 6.2 before it was released and have subsequently been upgraded
> to 6.2-RELEASE with no issues. So, we upgraded a 6.1 box which has
> been running fine as l
Thank you Kris, and all who took the time to respond.
Quoting Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 08:45:15PM -0800, Chris H. wrote:
Hello and thank you for your response...
Quoting Mike Jakubik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>Chris H. wrote:
>>
>>CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) XP (1102.51-
Hi Folks,
I am trying to set a jail hosting server to support multiple jails for
development testing.
The server has two network interfaces, I am configuring one for host
server to use, and the other with several aliased IPs, one for each of
the jail servers.
All the services running on th
On Wednesday 31 January 2007 11:06, Jeffrey Williams wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I am trying to set a jail hosting server to support multiple jails for
> development testing.
>
> The server has two network interfaces, I am configuring one for host
> server to use, and the other with several aliased IPs,
Milan Obuch wrote:
On Wednesday 31 January 2007 11:06, Jeffrey Williams wrote:
Hi Folks,
I am trying to set a jail hosting server to support multiple jails for
development testing.
The server has two network interfaces, I am configuring one for host
server to use, and the other with several
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 11:19:47AM +0100, Milan Obuch wrote:
> Why are you doing this? Are your addresses from the same network segment?
> I am binding my jail addresses to loopback interface and route
> them - this way
Same here. Together with net/quagga on the host, and a smart router
talking to
> Just for my edification, what is the point of "keep state" on an
> "any-to-any" rule?
It's a 'pass out' rule - without the 'keep state' the returning packets
wont get back in.
-pete.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
On Wednesday 31 January 2007 11:40, Jeffrey Williams wrote:
> Milan Obuch wrote:
> > On Wednesday 31 January 2007 11:06, Jeffrey Williams wrote:
> >> Hi Folks,
> >>
> >> I am trying to set a jail hosting server to support multiple jails for
> >> development testing.
> >>
> >> The server has two net
Milan Obuch wrote:
On Wednesday 31 January 2007 11:40, Jeffrey Williams wrote:
Milan Obuch wrote:
On Wednesday 31 January 2007 11:06, Jeffrey Williams wrote:
Hi Folks,
I am trying to set a jail hosting server to support multiple jails for
development testing.
The server has two network int
Jeffrey Williams wrote:
> I am trying to set a jail hosting server to support multiple jails for
> development testing.
>
> The server has two network interfaces, I am configuring one for host
> server to use, and the other with several aliased IPs, one for each of
> the jail servers.
>
Oliver Fromme wrote:
Jeffrey Williams wrote:
> I am trying to set a jail hosting server to support multiple jails for
> development testing.
>
> The server has two network interfaces, I am configuring one for host
> server to use, and the other with several aliased IPs, one for each of
Hello!
for about 4-5 days, I'm expeirencing heavy troubles with my VPN (mpd)
6.1-RELEASE based server.
After some time (minimum 2 seconds, maximum 12 hours) of running MPD
with moderate load (about 100-200 clients, CPU not overused), system
locks (even keyboard hangs) to reset. Nothing at al
Dear all!
This is not strictly "stable", unless I make a mistake and shoot myself
in the foot.
I have 6.2 amd64 with mobo asus k8n nforce3 250. This box I'd like to
use as host for usb hdd, that should contain linux install (debian 4.0,
when comes out). Two worlds have not to interfare in any meani
Does this make sense to anyone (it doesn't to me - procfs_doprofile
simply locks, calls vn_fullpath, and unlocks)? I was trying to track
down a hang by running a system under stress, and instead got this panic
as a result of a process running a perl script that looks through
/proc/; it occurre
From: Luigi Rizzo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 03:03:06PM -0500, Andresen, Jason R. wrote:
>> >From: Luigi Rizzo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >
>> >On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 06:10:21PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 2007-Jan-23 14:22:54 -0500, Andresen, Jason R. wr
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 11:47:48AM -0500, Andresen, Jason R. wrote:
> From: Luigi Rizzo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
> >yes but just curious, this is something so odd that i wonder
> >if you couldn't try to reproduce the real reasons for the increase.
> >Is the extra delay due to the device stopp
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:40:13 +0100
Zoran Kolic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is not strictly "stable", unless I make a mistake and shoot
> myself in the foot.
> I have 6.2 amd64 with mobo asus k8n nforce3 250. This box I'd like to
> use as host for usb hdd, that should contain linux install (d
I am on FreeBSD 6.1 and I'm seeing write() return EHOSTDOWN while
keeping the connection alive.
I wrote a simple C client on the affected FreeBSD box to write a series
of integers to a server program on another machine. When the client's
write receives an the EHOSTDOWN, the data it sent arrives on
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 09:30:56AM +0200, Stefan Lambrev wrote:
> Hello,
>
> >>pass out on (stf0) inet6 from any to any keep state
> >>
> >
> >Just for my edification, what is the point of "keep state" on an
> >"any-to-any" rule?
> >
> >
> imagine that you have only 2 rules -
> block in
I saw the same error yesterday building generic on i386. I resync'd the
sources(RELENG_6) today and the everything built properly.
cr
On Tuesday 30 January 2007 1:52 pm, Eli Dart wrote:
> I just saw the same thing under i386 when building GENERIC.
>
> --eli
>
> Alban Hertroys wrote:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Jeff Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>You should see something like "write failed: host is down" and the
>session will terminate. Of course, when ssh exits, the TCP connection
>closes. The only way to see that it's still open and active is by
>writing (or using) a
On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 15:04 -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Jeff Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >You should see something like "write failed: host is down" and the
> >session will terminate. Of course, when ssh exits, the TCP connection
> >closes. The only
Good day (or night, if more appropriate),
I'm seeing these for a while now, it's time to see if it can be fixed :P
I have a setup where a KVM/USB switch (Gefen 2x1 DVI switcher) is
connected to my athlon64 machine, which is connected to yet another
hub in my TFT display to which my keyboard
On Jan 31, 2007, at 22:48, Alban Hertroys wrote:
I compiled a kernel with DEBUG_USB enabled and attached the
resulting dmesg. I tried retrying usbd_new_device after the first
failure, but that just resulted in another STALLED message (as
suggested by an XXX remark in uhub.c).
Strange, I di
On Jan 31, 2007, at 22:59, Alban Hertroys wrote:
Strange, I did attach that file. It is in my sent box even... I
wonder where it got lost. Maybe the size?
Alright... here then: http://solfertje.student.utwente.nl/~dalroi/
dmesg.debug.out
I wonder who's stripping my mail.
--
Alban Hertroys
I'm trying to find out the best way to set up minidumps on my gmirror
drives. I have some questions about what is considered the correct way
of doing this. In particular:
1) The release notes say to "sysctl debug.minidump=1", but isn't doing
this in /etc/sysctl.conf too late in the proces
Hi *,
I recently installed 6.2 on a Supermicro P8SCT and I found that the loader
would hang after a few seconds unless I disabled the Adaptec 29160's BIOS.
It also has a 3ware 8006-2LP (which I am booting off). The SCSI card only has
a tape drive on it though so I'm surprised it would install a
Jeffrey Williams wrote:
[ ... ]
My only concern, and what I was hoping to get more information on, is
whether there are any potential problems with having two active ethernet
interfaces on the same network segment, e.g. arp issues, etc.
The problem you are going to run into is that the default
29 matches
Mail list logo
