Re: atacontrol kernel crash (atausb?)

* M. Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hans Petter Selasky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > : Instead of having all these quirks, isn't it possible that the SCSI layer > can > : auto-probe this? > > The short answer is no. There's no reliable wa

Crash at "sysctl -a"

Hi, I'm using freebsd-stable. From almost a year ago, my system crashes when I try to upgrade mysql because of "sysctl -a" in its configure script. Immediately after the rebooting, there's no problem but as the uptime increases, sysctl always crashes system. I'm using custom kernel follow

Re: rd.d/power_profile: dev.cpu.0.cx_supported doesn't exist

On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 04:39:29AM +0100, Lars Stokholm wrote: > Hi, > > After updating to 6.2-STABLE Sun Jan 28 02:57:55 CET 2007 (GENERIC), I > get an error on startup from sysctl, because dev.cpu.0.cx_supported > doesn't exist. I think I tracked it down to this update: > > http://www.freebsd

Re: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE and Flash 7 patch

On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 08:10:49AM +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote: > On Wed, 24 Jan 2007 22:51:07 +0100 > Torfinn Ingolfsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 24 Jan 2007 13:11:16 -0600 > > ejc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > rtld.c has changed a bit over time so here's a patch against the n

ath0: ath_reset: unable to reset hardware; hal status 3

Hi all, I have noticed a problem when using ath(4) as an 802.11g access point with hostapd(8) and WPA2-PSK CCMP. The following problem seems to only occur when a Microsoft Windows XP STA connects to the AP in 802.11g mode, my FreeeBSD STAs doesn't seem to trigger this: Jan 28 11:21:07 osgiliath

Re: rd.d/power_profile: dev.cpu.0.cx_supported doesn't exist

Roland Smith wrote: On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 04:39:29AM +0100, Lars Stokholm wrote: After updating to 6.2-STABLE Sun Jan 28 02:57:55 CET 2007 (GENERIC), I get an error on startup from sysctl, because dev.cpu.0.cx_supported doesn't exist. I think I tracked it down to this update: Also this erro

Re: Crash at "sysctl -a"

On 28/01/07, Lee Chung-Yeol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I'm using freebsd-stable. From almost a year ago, my system crashes when I try to upgrade mysql because of "sysctl -a" in its configure script. Immediately after the rebooting, there's no problem but as the uptime increases, sysctl

Re: rd.d/power_profile: dev.cpu.0.cx_supported doesn't exist

On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 12:14:40PM +0100, Lars Stokholm wrote: > Roland Smith wrote: > >On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 04:39:29AM +0100, Lars Stokholm wrote: > >>After updating to 6.2-STABLE Sun Jan 28 02:57:55 CET 2007 (GENERIC), I > >>get an error on startup from sysctl, because dev.cpu.0.cx_supported

Re: impossible rc.d ordering problem with stf and pf ?

Pete French wrote: Am trying to solve a little problem with 'pf'. I have a ruleset which has some firewall rules for the IPv6 interface stf0. This works fine, except when I rreboot the machine, as the pf script is run before the network_ipv6 script - so stf0 does not exist. but I cannot work out

Re: impossible rc.d ordering problem with stf and pf ?

On 12/23/-58 20:59, Pete French wrote: > Am trying to solve a little problem with 'pf'. I have a ruleset which > has some firewall rules for the IPv6 interface stf0. This works fine, > except when I rreboot the machine, as the pf script is run before the > network_ipv6 script - so stf0 does not exi

Re: rd.d/power_profile: dev.cpu.0.cx_supported doesn't exist

Roland Smith wrote: On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 12:14:40PM +0100, Lars Stokholm wrote: Roland Smith wrote: On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 04:39:29AM +0100, Lars Stokholm wrote: After updating to 6.2-STABLE Sun Jan 28 02:57:55 CET 2007 (GENERIC), I get an error on startup from sysctl, because dev.cpu.0.cx

Re: impossible rc.d ordering problem with stf and pf ?

Bruce M. Simpson wrote: Pete French wrote: Am trying to solve a little problem with 'pf'. I have a ruleset which has some firewall rules for the IPv6 interface stf0. This works fine, except when I rreboot the machine, as the pf script is run before the network_ipv6 script - so stf0 does not exis

Re: impossible rc.d ordering problem with stf and pf ?

or just make a symlink from /etc/rc.d/pf to /usr/local/etc/rc.d/pf i solved this way problem with FQDN in pf rules 2007/1/28, Volker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On 12/23/-58 20:59, Pete French wrote: > Am trying to solve a little problem with 'pf'. I have a ruleset which > has some firewall rules for

Re: impossible rc.d ordering problem with stf and pf ?

On 01/28/07 16:40, Alexey Karagodov wrote: > 2007/1/28, Volker <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >: > I've played with that problems a few times. It's not a perfect > solution, but you may create your own pf loading script and place it > in /usr/local/etc/rc.d/. To make sure

Re: impossible rc.d ordering problem with stf and pf ?

On Sunday 28 January 2007 16:33, Richard Coleman wrote: > Bruce M. Simpson wrote: > > Pete French wrote: > >> Am trying to solve a little problem with 'pf'. I have a ruleset > >> which has some firewall rules for the IPv6 interface stf0. This > >> works fine, except when I rreboot the machine, as t

Re: rd.d/power_profile: dev.cpu.0.cx_supported doesn't exist

On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 04:54:12PM +0100, Lars Stokholm wrote: > Whoops. I'm using 1.7.2.2, but it's the same: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/etc/rc.d/power_profile.diff?f=h&r1=text&tr1=1.7.2.1&r2=text&tr2=1.7.2.2 Looks like this is related to the following CVS commit: http://lists.fr

Re: impossible rc.d ordering problem with stf and pf ?

Max Laier wrote: On Sunday 28 January 2007 16:33, Richard Coleman wrote: Bruce M. Simpson wrote: Pete French wrote: Am trying to solve a little problem with 'pf'. I have a ruleset which has some firewall rules for the IPv6 interface stf0. This works fine, except when I rreboot the machine, as

Re: rd.d/power_profile: dev.cpu.0.cx_supported doesn't exist

Roland Smith wrote: On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 04:54:12PM +0100, Lars Stokholm wrote: Whoops. I'm using 1.7.2.2, but it's the same: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/etc/rc.d/power_profile.diff?f=h&r1=text&tr1=1.7.2.1&r2=text&tr2=1.7.2.2 Looks like this is related to the following CVS com

Re: rd.d/power_profile: dev.cpu.0.cx_supported doesn't exist

Lars Stokholm wrote: Roland Smith wrote: On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 04:54:12PM +0100, Lars Stokholm wrote: Whoops. I'm using 1.7.2.2, but it's the same: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/etc/rc.d/power_profile.diff?f=h&r1=text&tr1=1.7.2.1&r2=text&tr2=1.7.2.2 Looks like this is related t

Re: ath0: ath_reset: unable to reset hardware; hal status 3

Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: > Hi all, > > I have noticed a problem when using ath(4) as an 802.11g access point > with hostapd(8) and WPA2-PSK CCMP. > > The following problem seems to only occur when a Microsoft Windows XP > STA connects to the AP in 802.11g mode, my FreeeBSD STAs doesn't seem >

Re: SPARC64: Can't upgrade from 6.1 to 6.2 due to binutils

Matthew Herzog wrote: > I have never been able to upgrade Sparc64 from source. Then you must be doing something wrong. > I suspect it is nearly impossible. Certainly not. Works perfectly fine for me, just the same as FreeBSD/i386. Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co

Re: rd.d/power_profile: dev.cpu.0.cx_supported doesn't exist

On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 07:26:00PM +0100, Lars Stokholm wrote: > > Damnit, I seem to be making one mistake after another, with no end to > it. I'm truely sorry for wasting your time. Been there, done that. A lot of times when I had a problem with the base system (from 5.3-RELEASE uptil now) it

Re: rd.d/power_profile: dev.cpu.0.cx_supported doesn't exist

Roland Smith wrote: On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 07:26:00PM +0100, Lars Stokholm wrote: hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest: C1 sysctl: hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest: Invalid argument Works fine here: # sysctl hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest=C1/0 hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest: C1 -> C1 # sysctl hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest=C1/0 hw.acpi.cpu.c

buildkernel (zlib module) broken?

Hello, I don't understand this error: ===> zlib (all) cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=pentium3 -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I- -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include /FlashBSD/obj/i686/FlashBSD/src/sys/i686.intern-korso/opt_global.h -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -I@/../include

Re: buildkernel (zlib module) broken?

On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 10:12:26PM +0100, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > Hello, > > I don't understand this error: > ===> zlib (all) > cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=pentium3 -Werror -D_KERNEL > -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I- -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include > /FlashBSD/obj/i686/Flash

buildworld: make: don't know how to make ng_deflate.4

Result of 'make buildworld': gzip -cn /usr/src/share/man/man4/ng_cisco.4 > ng_cisco.4.gz make: don't know how to make ng_deflate.4. Stop *** Error code 2 My guess is, that it's caused by this commit: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all/2007-January/205804.html

Rejected posting to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are not authorized to send mail to the SOCIAL_WORK_ALUMNI list from your freebsd-stable@FREEBSD.ORG account. You might be authorized to send to the list from another of your accounts, or perhaps when using another mail program which generates slightly different addresses, but LISTSERV has

ath buildkernel problem with recent RELENG_6 [Was: Re: buildkernel (zlib module) broken?]

Am Sonntag, 28. Januar 2007 23:17 schrieb Kris Kennaway: > On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 10:12:26PM +0100, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I don't understand this error: > > ===> zlib (all) [...] > > 1 error > > *** Error code 2 > > > > Any hints? > > Rerun make without -j and discover the

Re: ath buildkernel problem with recent RELENG_6 [Was: Re: buildkernel (zlib module) broken?]

On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 01:02:32AM +0100, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > Am Sonntag, 28. Januar 2007 23:17 schrieb Kris Kennaway: > > On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 10:12:26PM +0100, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I don't understand this error: > > > ===> zlib (all) > [...] > > > 1 erro

Re: ath buildkernel problem with recent RELENG_6 [Was: Re: buildkernel (zlib module) broken?]

Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 01:02:32AM +0100, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: >> Am Sonntag, 28. Januar 2007 23:17 schrieb Kris Kennaway: >>> On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 10:12:26PM +0100, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: Hello, I don't understand this error: ===> zlib (all)

Re: arp: unknown hardware address format

On 24/01/07, Ilia Gorstkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all! FreeBSD 6.2-release. I'm having trouble with arp: arp: unknown hardware address format (0x4500) and arp: unknown hardware address format (0x4242) these messages fall on the console in a plenty. What kind of device is this? Is it a

Re: ath buildkernel problem with recent RELENG_6 [Was: Re: buildkernel (zlib module) broken?]

Am Sun, 28 Jan 2007 19:09:02 -0800 schrieb Sam Leffler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 01:02:32AM +0100, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: [...] > >> ath seems to be the problem: > > > > No, your kernel config is the problem ;) You apparently chopped out > > too m

New IPv6 LOR in 6.2-RELEASE

FYI: saw this when upgrading one of my boxes (quad-cpu Opteron, 2GB of RAM) to 6.2-RELEASE: > Firewall logging enabled > net.inet.ip.fw.enable: 1 -> 1 > lock order reversal: > 1st 0xff00b79c3cc8 inp (raw6inp) @ /usr/src/sys/netinet6/raw_ip6.c:153 > 2nd 0xff00b79c3df8 inp (rawinp) @ /usr/

Re: 6.1BETA3 amd64 doesn't detect my floppy drive

On Thursday 09 March 2006 12:11, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > On Tuesday 07 March 2006 09:22, M. Warner Losh wrote: > > Maybe the output of size kernel? > >textdata bss dec hex filename > 3069343 305288 212944 3587575 36bdf7 /boot/kernel/kernel (6.0-RC1 custom) > 5746665 702632

6.2 bge regression

I have some Supermicro P8SCT based systems I would like to run 6.2 on, unfortunately something between 6.1 and 6.2 has broken bge on this board. This board has 2 bge's and the first one is on before the BIOS hands off to the OS (I can see the activity light flash) but when the kernel attaches the

Re: 6.2 bge regression

Hi, Daniel, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > I have some Supermicro P8SCT based systems I would like to run 6.2 on, > unfortunately something between 6.1 and 6.2 has broken bge on this board. > > This board has 2 bge's and the first one is on before the BIOS hands off to > the OS (I can see the activity