On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, Ceri Davies wrote:
So far it's happened this morning and yesterday morning. I haven't seen
it before that. I don't know the cause so I can't reproduce it at will,
but the logs don't give any indication. Chances are that it will happen
again tomorrow, but we'll see.
Hm
On Sat, 30 Dec 2006, Karol Kwiatkowski wrote:
Robert Watson wrote:
On Sat, 30 Dec 2006, Karol Kwiatkowski wrote:
Robert Watson wrote:
P.S. out of curiosity - now that I have configured kernel with DDB and
KDB options, is there any performance penalty of running such kernel?
No, it should
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, Frode Nordahl wrote:
I am experiencing a rare livelock on four of my backend mail servers running
6.1-STABLE, 6.2-BETA2 and 6.2-RC1. They are running OpenLDAP slapd, postfix
and UW-IMAPD.
The servers can run for months without any problem, but nevertheless I have
experie
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Just had the following happen on a FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #7: Sun Dec 17
01:28:52 AST 2006 system ... amd64, HP Proliant, 6G of RAM ... have core if
there is information that I can provide out of it ...
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mod
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Working on upgrading and applying patch right now ... thanks ...
- --On Sunday, January 07, 2007 14:03:41 + Robert Watson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
>> Just had the following happen on a FreeBSD
Hello.
We are running an (IRC) server that under high-rate traffic (ie. DDoS
attack) stops to respond to the network. The network remains locked up
even after the original attack stops. However running tcpdump (which
switches the interface into promisc mode) unlocks networking and things
work agai
Hello,
the company I'm working is about to purchae some additional NICs for
some replacement built-in NICs of nForce 405-based desktop PCs. I would
like to purchase the above mentioned NICs from Intel, hoping the em()
driver is capable of handling the NICs.
I found in the list of supported hard
On Friday, 5 January 2007 at 18:00:29 -0500, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 06:59:10PM +0200, Nikolay Pavlov wrote:
> > Hello folks.
> > I have kernel panic on GENERIC kernel while executing postmark.
>
> What is postmark?
> Can you give the exact sequence of steps used to produ
Erik Trulsson wrote:
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 04:56:26PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
Hello,
the company I'm working is about to purchae some additional NICs for
some replacement built-in NICs of nForce 405-based desktop PCs. I would
like to purchase the above mentioned NICs from Intel, hoping the
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 04:56:26PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Hello,
> the company I'm working is about to purchae some additional NICs for
> some replacement built-in NICs of nForce 405-based desktop PCs. I would
> like to purchase the above mentioned NICs from Intel, hoping the em()
> driver
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 06:59:10PM +0200, Nikolay Pavlov wrote:
> Hello folks.
> I have kernel panic on GENERIC kernel while executing postmark.
The sequence of steps that Nikolay used to produce this panic was:
- install benchmarks/postmark from ports
root# postmark
PostMark v1.5 : 3/27/01
pm>s
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 11:49:56AM +, Robert Watson wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, Ceri Davies wrote:
>
> >>>So far it's happened this morning and yesterday morning. I haven't seen
> >>>it before that. I don't know the cause so I can't reproduce it at will,
> >>>but the logs don't give any i
Hello list,
I keep having troubles compiling either 6.1-RELEASE and 6.2-RC2.
I downloaded sources, extracted them with install.sh and did a cvsup.
My installed system is 6.1-RELEASE and I keep trying to compile it on my
own.
Playing with various parameters did not help neither helped switchin
On Sun, 7 Jan 2007, Ceri Davies wrote:
Could you try printing *td->td_ar? Maybe this will give us a clue as to
how far it got. In particular, this may be able to more reliably give us
the file descriptor number, which is audited early in the system call.
You might find that 'td' is corrupte
On Sun, 2007-Jan-07 17:44:24 +0100, Christoph Illnar wrote:
>I keep having troubles compiling either 6.1-RELEASE and 6.2-RC2.
>I downloaded sources, extracted them with install.sh and did a cvsup.
>
>My installed system is 6.1-RELEASE and I keep trying to compile it on my
>own.
Is the failure con
Hello,
> I keep having troubles compiling either 6.1-RELEASE and 6.2-RC2.
> I downloaded sources, extracted them with install.sh and did a cvsup.
> [..]
> # make buildworld
> it breaks with these last lines:
>
> [.. lines suppressed ..]
> building shared library libpmc.so.3
> ===
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 06:05:39PM +, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> On Sun, 7 Jan 2007, Ceri Davies wrote:
>
> >>Could you try printing *td->td_ar? Maybe this will give us a clue as to
> >>how far it got. In particular, this may be able to more reliably give us
> >>the file descriptor number,
At 11:43 AM 1/7/2007, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 06:59:10PM +0200, Nikolay Pavlov wrote:
> Hello folks.
> I have kernel panic on GENERIC kernel while executing postmark.
The sequence of steps that Nikolay used to produce this panic was:
- install benchmarks/postmark from por
On 1/7/07, Erik Trulsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 04:56:26PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Hello,
> the company I'm working is about to purchae some additional NICs for
> some replacement built-in NICs of nForce 405-based desktop PCs. I would
> like to purchase the above m
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 02:25:02PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> At 11:43 AM 1/7/2007, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> >On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 06:59:10PM +0200, Nikolay Pavlov wrote:
> >> Hello folks.
> >> I have kernel panic on GENERIC kernel while executing postmark.
> >
> >The sequence of steps that Nik
I am starting a new thread on this as what I had assumed was a panic in
nfsd turns out to be an issue with the bge driver. This is an amd64 box,
dual processor (SMP kernel) that happens to be running nfsd. About every
3-5 days the kernel panics and I have finally managed to get a core
dump.
The sy
(Scott: I should have emailed you this earlier, but Christmas and various
other things got in the way.)
Ian West wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 02:25:02PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> > At 11:43 AM 1/7/2007, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> > >On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 06:59:10PM +0200, Nikolay Pavlov wro
Peter Jeremy wrote:
> I've just noticed an number of unpexected "IP address changed MAC"
> messages on one of the hosts in my network. It is connected via a
> FreeBSD bridge to the rest of my network (there aren't enuf network
> ports in my son's bedroom). The configuration looks like:
>
> +--
On 1/7/07,"Jack Vogel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, all released Intel PCI-E wired NICs are supported, sometimes not all
> features of the hardware are supported, but my job at Intel is to keep
> the driver
> working with new hardware, and to add support for features that don't have
> such n
> Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 14:03:41 + (GMT)
> From: Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> > Just had the following happen on a FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #7: Sun Dec 17>
> > 01:28:52 AST 2006 system ... amd64, HP Proliant,
Craig Rodrigues wrote:
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 06:59:10PM +0200, Nikolay Pavlov wrote:
Hello folks.
I have kernel panic on GENERIC kernel while executing postmark.
The sequence of steps that Nikolay used to produce this panic was:
- install benchmarks/postmark from ports
root# postmark
PostM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm up and running on the patch now as well ...
- --On Sunday, January 07, 2007 17:02:40 -0800 Kevin Oberman <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 14:03:41 + (GMT)
>> From: Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Sender: [EMAIL PROT
Jan Mikkelsen wrote:
(Scott: I should have emailed you this earlier, but Christmas and various
other things got in the way.)
Ian West wrote:
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 02:25:02PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 11:43 AM 1/7/2007, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 06:59:10PM +0200, Nik
On Sun, 7 Jan 2007, Sven Willenberger wrote:
I am starting a new thread on this as what I had assumed was a panic in
nfsd turns out to be an issue with the bge driver. This is an amd64 box,
dual processor (SMP kernel) that happens to be running nfsd. About every
3-5 days the kernel panics and I
29 matches
Mail list logo
