panic: sleeping thread

2006-12-09 Thread Marc G. Fournier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Without a core dump, does this mean anything to anyone? Sleeping thread (tid 101251, pid 38200) owns a non-sleepable lock panic: sleeping thread cpuid = 1 The kernel was last upgraded: FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #1: Fri Nov 17 23:31:41 AST 2006 I'm go

[ipfw] Dynamic rules grow indefinitely..

2006-12-09 Thread Nicolae Namolovan
It is a web server with ~130req/s, problems seem to start after upgrading to a new hardware. FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p10 Right now: ipfw -d list | wc -l 4338 After a hour it will grow more and more.. The day before yesterday I got 20 000 dynamic rules ;o) (I was forced to increase net.inet.ip.fw

Re: [ipfw] Dynamic rules grow indefinitely..

2006-12-09 Thread Andrey V. Elsukov
>It is a web server with ~130req/s, problems seem to start after >upgrading to a new hardware. >FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p10 Can you show your /var/run/dmesg.boot, and output of `pciconf -lv` and ifconfig? >After a hour it will grow more and more.. The day before yesterday I >got 20 000 dynamic rules

Re: [ipfw] Dynamic rules grow indefinitely..

2006-12-09 Thread Nicolae Namolovan
My god ! sysctl net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_keepalive=0 seem to help ! In few minutes I got "ipfw -d list | wc -l" from 5708 to 3250 and it continue to decrease.. 2033 now.. haha.. great.. 876 wow.. stabilizing.. now float arround 1000, perfect ! Strange, why only me(?) get this problem.. Isn't net.inet.i

Re: [ipfw] Dynamic rules grow indefinitely..

2006-12-09 Thread Andrey V. Elsukov
>Strange, why only me(?) get this problem.. Isn't >net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_keepalive=1 by default ? This is a workaround. I am aware about this problem from several people. Here is needed more testing to determine the cause of the bug. Do you have a lastest FreeBSD release? Bug is still present in RELE

Re: [ipfw] Dynamic rules grow indefinitely..

2006-12-09 Thread Nicolae Namolovan
I have 6.1-RELEASE-p10, last addition to "UPDATING" file is 2006.09.30. Could updating to RELENG_6_2 fix that problem ? On 12/9/06, Andrey V. Elsukov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Strange, why only me(?) get this problem.. Isn't >net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_keepalive=1 by default ? This is a workaround.

Re: [ipfw] Dynamic rules grow indefinitely..

2006-12-09 Thread Nicolae Namolovan
Is there a big performance impact with net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_keepalive=0 ? On 12/9/06, Nicolae Namolovan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have 6.1-RELEASE-p10, last addition to "UPDATING" file is 2006.09.30. Could updating to RELENG_6_2 fix that problem ? On 12/9/06, Andrey V. Elsukov <[EMAIL PROTECT