On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 01:20:33PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Scott Long wrote:
> > Kevin Oberman wrote:
> >>> Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:58:39 -0700
> >>> From: Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>
> >>> David Malone wrote:
> >>>
> > These two bugs are shown for
On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 05:08:03PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
> A while ago since now I receive kernel messages like this in FreeBSD
> 6.2-PRE/AMD64:
>
> fsync: giving up on dirty
> 0xff000362c7c0: tag devfs, type VCHR
> usecount 1, writecount 0, refcount 325 mountedhere 0xff00504d8400
Hi,
the attached lor.txt contains LOR I got this yesterday. It is FreeBSD 6.1
with relatively recent kernel, from last week or so.
--
VH
+lock order reversal:
+ 1st 0xc537f300 kqueue (kqueue) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_event.c:1547
+ 2nd 0xc45c22dc struct mount mtx (struct mount mtx) @
/usr/src/sys
On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 05:26:38PM +, Robert Watson wrote:
> >Has GNATS been fixed? I mean its search (by ID or single line fields).
> Apparently the mirror of the GNATS database on the web server had become
> corrupted; Ken Smith has apparently fixed this, and it looks like the
> database i
On 23/11/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 04:38:48PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >kris a development on this, someone else posted about a nfs problem
> >and reading his post some starkling point he made about network car
Colin Percival wrote:
> Petr Holub wrote:
>>> I'm working on it.
>> If I install RC1 now, would it be possible to upgrade to RC2
>> and RELEASE, or is it not ready yet?
>
> My intention is that anyone running 6.1-RELEASE, 6.2-BETA*, or
> 6.2-RC* will be able to upgrade to the latest release candid
On Fri, 24 Nov 2006, Kevin Oberman wrote:
I don't know of a concerted effort by anyone to improve UFS in this way. I
would guess that the odd bug would have been resolved, but no large scale
work.
Another thing to keep in mind is that filesystem mounting is only available
to the super-user.
Hello,
More than a year ago I discovered a bug in msdosfs incorrectly handling
NT 8.3 capitalization. It was discussed on the lists and Micah prepared
a patch and filed this PR: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=86655
Unfortunately, it seems to have been forgotten.
Can some of the commit
Roland Smith wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 05:08:03PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
>
>> A while ago since now I receive kernel messages like this in FreeBSD
>> 6.2-PRE/AMD64:
>>
>> fsync: giving up on dirty
>> 0xff000362c7c0: tag devfs, type VCHR
>> usecount 1, writecount 0, refcount 325
On Sun, 26 Nov 2006, 16:37+0100, martinko wrote:
> Hello,
>
> More than a year ago I discovered a bug in msdosfs incorrectly handling
> NT 8.3 capitalization. It was discussed on the lists and Micah prepared
> a patch and filed this PR: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=86655
> Unfortuna
On Sun, 26 Nov 2006, Václav Haisman wrote:
Hi,
the attached lor.txt contains LOR I got this yesterday. It is FreeBSD 6.1
with relatively recent kernel, from last week or so.
lock order reversal:
1st 0xc537f300 kqueue (kqueue) @ sys/kern/kern_event.c:1547
2nd 0xc45c22dc struct mount mtx (str
TB --- 2006-11-26 20:50:43 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2006-11-26 20:50:43 - starting RELENG_6_2 tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2006-11-26 20:50:43 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2006-11-26 20:50:43 - checking out the source tree
TB --- 2006-11-26 20:50:43 -
I just bought a large external hard drive for home backups (500g Western Digital My Book). When I
plug it in to my machine (RELENG_6 from about a week ago), the system sees the device just fine:
Nov 26 22:03:21 neptune kernel: umass0: Western Digital External HDD, rev
2.00/1.06, addr 2
Nov 26
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Coleman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 5:23 AM
Subject: Large msdosfs disk will not mount on RELENG_6
I just bought a large external hard drive for home backups (500g Western
Digital My Book). When I plug it in to my mac
On Sun, 2006-11-26 at 19:23, Richard Coleman wrote:
> I just bought a large external hard drive for home backups (500g Western
> Digital My Book). When I
> plug it in to my machine (RELENG_6 from about a week ago), the system sees
> the device just fine:
>
> Nov 26 22:03:21 neptune kernel: uma
On Nov 27, 2006, at 1:09 , Clayton Milos wrote:
I just bought a large external hard drive for home backups (500g
Western Digital My Book). When I plug it in to my machine
(RELENG_6 from about a week ago), the system sees the device just
fine:
I am very suprised at all that windows would
Clayton Milos wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Richard Coleman"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 5:23 AM
Subject: Large msdosfs disk will not mount on RELENG_6
I just bought a large external hard drive for home backups (500g
Western Digital My Book). When
Hi Richard,
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 10:23:14PM -0500, Richard Coleman wrote:
> I just bought a large external hard drive for home backups (500g Western
> Digital My Book). When I plug it in to my machine (RELENG_6 from about a
> week ago), the system sees the device just fine:
>
> Nov 26 22:03
On Nov 27, 2006, at 1:26 , Richard Coleman wrote:
As to using da0 rather than da0s1, that's how I've always seen to
mount a msdosfs partition (and it works for my 256M usb key drive).
Flash drives usually don't have partition tables. The WD drive does;
I checked it with fdisk before tryin
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 07:34:09AM +0100, Rink Springer wrote:
> Looking at /sys/fs/msdosfs/msdosfs_vfsops.c seems to hint the existance
> of options MSDOSFS_LARGE; this avoids the error message and will let you
> mount the disk.
Oh, and before I forget: this option is defined in /sys/conf/NOTES a
Christian Brueffer wrote:
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 10:23:14PM -0500, Richard Coleman wrote:
I just bought a large external hard drive for home backups (500g Western
Digital My Book). When I plug it in to my machine (RELENG_6 from about a
week ago), the system sees the device just fine:
Nov 26
On Sun, 2006-11-26 at 22:09, Clayton Milos wrote:
>
> As far as I am aware windows 2000 and xp will only allow you to format up to
> a 32G dive with FAT32. Any bigger and it will force you to use NTFS. The
> other strange thing is tht you are trying to mount /dev/da0 and not
> /dev/de0s1.
Th
Rink Springer wrote:
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 07:34:09AM +0100, Rink Springer wrote:
Looking at /sys/fs/msdosfs/msdosfs_vfsops.c seems to hint the existance
of options MSDOSFS_LARGE; this avoids the error message and will let you
mount the disk.
Oh, and before I forget: this option is defined i
23 matches
Mail list logo
