On Sat, 2006-10-14 at 14:39 -0500, Mark Kane wrote:
> I can open a PR if needed, but I don't really have any data or
> debugging info (no errors on the screen, or in /var/log/messages). I
> only know that after the system was up since the last rebuild and I
> rebooted it yesterday, the system hangs
Hi Kip,
Where you a troll when you outlined how your port
of FreeBSD 6 to Solaris was so bad that it was
virtually unusable? Stating facts is not
trolling. The fact that you may not want to hear
it is your own problem. I'm fairly certain that
you know that every single thing I'm saying is
true, bu
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 07:57:32AM -0700, Danial Thom wrote:
> Hi Kip,
>
> Where you a troll when you outlined how your port
> of FreeBSD 6 to Solaris was so bad that it was
> virtually unusable? Stating facts is not
> trolling.
And you crossposted this to performance...why?
Kip might be right,
Hi,
I have a freebsd box (6-stable) which export its root slice to NFS. The
exports file is:
/ -alldirs -maproot=root -network 10.0.0 -mask 255.255.255.0
After making world & kernel today, the nfs client said that permission
denied.
But another freebsd box (making world & kernel today, to
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 11:11:44PM +0800, Lin Jui-Nan Eric wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a freebsd box (6-stable) which export its root slice to NFS. The
> exports file is:
>
> / -alldirs -maproot=root -network 10.0.0 -mask 255.255.255.0
>
> After making world & kernel today, the nfs client
Hi,
If I revert to revision 1.81.2.4, it worked correctly.
On 10/15/06, Rink Springer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Hmm, I recently changed something which might trigger this. Could you
back out revision 1.81.2.5 of src/usr.sbin/mountd/mountd.c and let me
know whether this fixed the problem?
On 10/15/06, Lin Jui-Nan Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
But another freebsd box (making world & kernel today, too) exports its /home
slice, and the nfs client did complain about it.
Sorry, should be "did not complain".
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.o
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 11:30:23PM +0800, Lin Jui-Nan Eric wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If I revert to revision 1.81.2.4, it worked correctly.
>
> On 10/15/06, Rink Springer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >Hmm, I recently changed something which might trigger this. Could you
> >back out revisio
Hi,
On 10/15/06, Rink Springer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
OK, could you try the attached patch (untested) and let me know whether
it works? (it patches the 1.81.2.5 revision of mountd.c)
No, it does not work.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailin
I saw this come up a couple of weeks ago. Don't know if it is a 6.2
showstopper or not (probably not?).
I see the following message come up during boot. Both pcm and cd0 appear to
work so I don't know if the message matters or not. Message highlighted by ***
below. A truly minor nit: the messa
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 07:57:32AM -0700, Danial Thom wrote:
> Stating facts is not trolling.
true, but ...
> The fact that you may not want to hear it is your own problem [...]
> You can't keep promoting this junk they're putting out. You can't just
> keep kicking the Matt Dillons out of the cam
On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 12:27:32 -0400
Peter Carah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I saw this come up a couple of weeks ago. Don't know if it is a 6.2
> showstopper or not (probably not?).
>
> I see the following message come up during boot. Both pcm and cd0
> appear to work so I don't know if the mess
--- Mark Linimon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 07:57:32AM -0700,
> Danial Thom wrote:
> > Stating facts is not trolling.
>
> true, but ...
>
> > The fact that you may not want to hear it is
> your own problem [...]
> > You can't keep promoting this junk they're
> putting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Danial Thom wrote:
> There isn't one person on that team that knows how to fix what's
> wrong ..
For everyone's benefit then, please feel free to submit your patches
along with your technical analysis,
Michael
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Ver
Danial Thom wrote:
--- Mark Linimon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 07:57:32AM -0700,
Danial Thom wrote:
Stating facts is not trolling.
true, but ...
The fact that you may not want to hear it is
your own problem [...]
You can't keep promoting this junk they're
putting
Hi
I just tried to enable network polling on my router box, a P2 400MHz
with 3 different NICs (one internal, i think its the fxp one):
fxp0: port 0x7c60-0x7c7f mem
0xf3dff000-0xf3df,0xf3f0-0xf3ff irq 11 at device 3.0 on pci0
miibus0: on fxp0
inphy0: on miibus0
inphy0: 10bas
On Sunday 15 October 2006 14:42, Ariff Abdullah wrote:
> > pcm0:
> > *
> > bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly.bus_dmamem_alloc
> > failed to align memory properly.cd0 at ata1 bus 0 target 0 lun 0
> > *
>
> This DMA misal
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006, at 12:38:58 +0200, Joel Dahl wrote:
> So, loading snd_emu10k1 worked before the last rebuild? Could you
> perhaps do a binary search and try to narrow it down to a specific
> commit?
On September 21, I rebuilt world/kernel and did the normal update
procedure. The module load
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 11:45:23PM +0800, Lin Jui-Nan Eric wrote:
> No, it does not work.
Hmm, I am assuming that the filesystem isn't shown when you do a
'showmount -e' on the server, is this correct? Anything relevant in your
/var/log/messages ?
--
Rink P.W. Springer
[Second attempt to send this, since my ISP's mailserver seems to have eaten
the first attempt. Apologies if it appears twice.]
Alright, that gives useful information. The output from pciconf and dmesg
indicates strongly that what you have is an Asus motherboard with an VIA
vt8251 southbridge.
[Second attempt to send this, since my first seems to have been eaten by my
ISP. Apologies if it appears twice.]
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 05:40:22PM +0200, Rink Springer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 11:30:23PM +0800, Lin Jui-Nan Eric wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > If I revert to revision 1.
* Benjamin Lutz, 2006-10-11 :
> This seems to be the exact same issue that I'm having. Since those
> threads are from March 2006, and I'm running FreeBSD-6.2-PRERELEASE, it
> appears that the problem has not yet been fixed, so I'd like to ask you
> to have another look at it. If you need more d
Hiya,
Whats the "right" way to grab kernel profiling data these days?
I've tried using the kernel profiling w/ kgmon and gprof but the top CPU
wasters are the profiling functions themselves, quickly followed by
write_eflags(). I'm not sure this is valid at all.
I'm running 6-stable on an Athlon
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 10:53:36AM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hiya,
>
> Whats the "right" way to grab kernel profiling data these days?
>
> I've tried using the kernel profiling w/ kgmon and gprof but the top CPU
> wasters are the profiling functions themselves, quickly followed by
> write_efla
Has anyone else lost their flash7 plugin in firefox on 6-STABLE?
FreeBSD dwpc.dwlabs.ca 6.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #4: Mon
Oct 9 01:50:25 ADT 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DWPC-KERNEL i386
I've been trying to figure this one out for several days!
/usr/src/libexec/
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 02:01:08PM -0400, Michael Butler wrote:
> For everyone's benefit then, please feel free to submit your patches
> along with your technical analysis.
I think his best bet is a fork, instead. Then he can tell all the people
that volunteer to work on _his_ project exactly wha
On 10/16/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
pmc can be extremely useful although it doesn't do call graphs.
Someone pointed it out to me on IRC and I'm playing with it now. Thanks.
Adrian
--
Adrian Chadd - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-
Mark Linimon wrote:
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 02:01:08PM -0400, Michael Butler wrote:
For everyone's benefit then, please feel free to submit your patches
along with your technical analysis.
I think his best bet is a fork, instead. Then he can tell all the people
that volunteer to work on _his_
Hi,
The filesystem isn't shown in a 'showmount -e'.
Nothing relevant in my /var/log/messages.
On 10/16/06, Rink Springer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 11:45:23PM +0800, Lin Jui-Nan Eric wrote:
> No, it does not work.
Hmm, I am assuming that the filesystem isn't shown when
Marcus Alves Grando wrote:
Eric Anholt wrote:
On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 13:25 +0800, Ganbold wrote:
Hi,
http://marcus.grupos.com.br:8080/patch/agp_i810.c.patch
Eric, Marcus,
Just wanted to let you know that the mouse problem exist even when 945GM
patch is not applied. So it is something else.
TB --- 2006-10-16 04:13:13 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2006-10-16 04:13:13 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for alpha/alpha
TB --- 2006-10-16 04:13:13 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2006-10-16 04:13:46 - checking out the source tree
TB --- 2006-10-16 04:13:46 - c
TB --- 2006-10-16 05:20:25 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2006-10-16 05:20:25 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2006-10-16 05:20:25 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2006-10-16 05:20:58 - checking out the source tree
TB --- 2006-10-16 05:20:58 - cd
Hi Erik,
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 12:01:11AM +0200, Erik Trulsson wrote:
> [Second attempt to send this, since my first seems to have been eaten by my
> ISP. Apologies if it appears twice.]
>
> On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 05:40:22PM +0200, Rink Springer wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 a
TB --- 2006-10-16 05:15:49 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2006-10-16 05:15:49 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2006-10-16 05:15:50 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2006-10-16 05:16:31 - checking out the source tree
TB --- 2006-10-16 05:16:31 - c
34 matches
Mail list logo
