Christopher Sean Hilton wrote:
On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 16:37 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
and my luck has it such that i've not had a lockup since i added that
extra debugging code into the kernel :-) or :-( depending on your
view...
Heisenbugs are great! :)
Before I classifi
Dear Nikolas Britton,
Sorry, I was busy on some raid bug fix and cause this driver released delay.
It had been test this driver on my Lab. for a long time.
Hope it can release on FreeBSD new kernel in the near future.
Best Regards
Erich Chen
- Original Message -
From: "Nikolas Britton"
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 03:23:49PM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
>
> On Sep 22, 2006, at 4:36 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> >Start by enabling INVARIANTS, INVARIANT_SUPPORT, DEBUG_LOCKS and
> >DEBUG_VFS_LOCKS, then run 'show lockedvnods' and 'alltrace' in DDB
> >(spammy, need that serial console), or
On 10/3/06, Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Scott I. Remick wrote:
> Eduardo Meyer wrote:
>>
>> I have been pointed in private mail to http://www.fdcservers.net/
>> which seems to treat FreeBSD more seriously too, in case anyone else
>> is/get disapointed by EV1's lack of pro
Hi all,
i was wondering if an update of /usr/src/contrib/amd is planned ?
I encounter a problem using amd with nolock options, and it seems that
this problem was fixed on recent version of am-utils.
Many thanks,
Nicolas
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mai
Alexandre Vieira wrote:
I was also told that http://www.serverpronto.com/ is freebsd friendly and
extremely cheap.
Since this seems to have become a recommendation thread, I'm a happy
customer of http://www.johncompanies.com/. They offer discounts to open
source contributor's too.
N
__
In the last episode (Oct 03), Nicolas Martin said:
> i was wondering if an update of /usr/src/contrib/amd is planned ? I
> encounter a problem using amd with nolock options, and it seems that
> this problem was fixed on recent version of am-utils.
If anything, it would be updated in -current, not
On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 13:25 +0800, Ganbold wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have strange problem with my Dell Latitude D620 laptop which has 945GM
> chipset and onboard graphic card.
> I'm using September 30th RELENG_6.
>
> If I use acpi_video only, mplayer can only use "sdl" video output for
> full screen p
Hi list,
i have just updated to 6.2-PRERELEASE and GRUB is unable to use
the new /boot/loader. Ending in an endless loop rebooting after
selecting FreeBSD.
As a workaround it was possible to chainload FreeBSD.
Further investigation shows that /boot/loader.old is woking.
Eric Anholt wrote:
On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 13:25 +0800, Ganbold wrote:
Hi,
I have strange problem with my Dell Latitude D620 laptop which has 945GM
chipset and onboard graphic card.
I'm using September 30th RELENG_6.
If I use acpi_video only, mplayer can only use "sdl" video output for
full s
On Monday 02 October 2006 21:16, Roland Smith wrote:
> Well, these are the same guys that bought a license from SCO for SCO's
> alleged "IP" in Linux (and alledgedly in *BSD, before the settlement in
> USL vs BSDi was made public). Apparently after a large
> bribe^H^H^H^H^Hdiscount from Microsoft.
On Mon, 2 Oct 2006, Larry Rosenman wrote:
I can also make a shell account available if a dev wants to nose around.
LER
Should I just send-pr this dump info and hold on to the 4G vmcore for
a while?
LER
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 512-248-
On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 15:53:26 -0400
John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/smbus_locking.patch
Hmm, I have a Nforce4-based maonboard, and went looking for nfsmb, but
I can't find it anywhere on my system.
My system is:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] uname -a
FreeBSD kg-qu
On Sunday 01 October 2006 12:08, Marcin Koziej wrote:
> 2) vmstat -i now shows:
> interrupt total rate
> irq0: clk6824889968
> irq1: atkbd0 13103 1
> irq4: sio0 2 0
> i
On Tuesday 03 October 2006 12:55, Norbert Augenstein wrote:
> Hi list,
> i have just updated to 6.2-PRERELEASE and GRUB is unable to use
> the new /boot/loader. Ending in an endless loop rebooting after
> selecting FreeBSD.
> As a workaround it was possible to chainload FreeBSD.
Hi,
I'll do an update of /usr/src/contrib/amd soon, after 6.2 is done.
Maybe we will see it then in 6.3 RELEASE :-)
Martin
Martin Blapp, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
ImproWare AG, UNIXSP & ISP, Zurlindenstrasse 29, 4
Hello Nik,
Tuesday, October 3, 2006, 4:31:11 PM, you wrote:
> Alexandre Vieira wrote:
>> I was also told that http://www.serverpronto.com/ is freebsd friendly and
>> extremely cheap.
> Since this seems to have become a recommendation thread, I'm a happy
> customer of http://www.johncompanies.co
Hi John,
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 03:00:40PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 October 2006 12:55, Norbert Augenstein wrote:
> > Hi list,
> > i have just updated to 6.2-PRERELEASE and GRUB is unable to use
> > the new /boot/loader. Ending in an endless loop rebooting after
> >
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 11:47:35PM +0400, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 03:00:40PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Tuesday 03 October 2006 12:55, Norbert Augenstein wrote:
> > > Hi list,
> > > i have just updated to 6.2-PRERELEASE and GRUB is unable to use
On Tuesday 03 October 2006 15:00, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 15:53:26 -0400
> John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/smbus_locking.patch
>
> Hmm, I have a Nforce4-based maonboard, and went looking for nfsmb, but
> I can't find it anyw
On Tuesday 03 October 2006 15:48, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 11:47:35PM +0400, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > Hi John,
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 03:00:40PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 03 October 2006 12:55, Norbert Augenstein wrote:
> > > > Hi list,
> > >
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 03:58:38PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 October 2006 15:48, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 11:47:35PM +0400, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > > Hi John,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 03:00:40PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 03
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 09:00:29PM +0200, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 15:53:26 -0400
> John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/smbus_locking.patch
>
> Hmm, I have a Nforce4-based maonboard, and went looking for nfsmb, but
> I can't find
Marcus Alves Grando wrote:
Eric Anholt wrote:
On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 13:25 +0800, Ganbold wrote:
Hi,
I have strange problem with my Dell Latitude D620 laptop which has
945GM chipset and onboard graphic card.
I'm using September 30th RELENG_6.
If I use acpi_video only, mplayer can only use "s
On Oct 3, 2006, at 4:43 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
Details are posted at http://vivek.khera.org/scratch/crashlogs/
I have the crashdumps available to a kernel hacker upon request (i'd
rather not make them generally available to the public...)
It seems that you have snapshotted fs exported by
I know there is work being done on this for -HEAD, but does anyone know if it
will run under -STABLE?
I don't see a port for it, so I'm guessing not, but figured I'd ask ...
Thx ...
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Eric Anholt wrote:
On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 13:25 +0800, Ganbold wrote:
Hi,
I have strange problem with my Dell Latitude D620 laptop which has 945GM
chipset and onboard graphic card.
I'm using September 30th RELENG_6.
If I use acpi_video only, mplayer can only use "sdl" video output for
ful
$ dmesg | grep bge
bge0: mem
0xe820-0xe820 irq 17 at device 4.0 on pci4
miibus1: on bge0
bge0: Ethernet address: 00:0b:cd:e7:51:ba
bge0: watchdog timeout -- resetting
bge0: link state changed to DOWN
bge0: link state changed to UP
I initially pronounced the network cable dead and replace
John Marshall wrote:
$ dmesg | grep bge
bge0: mem
0xe820-0xe820 irq 17 at device 4.0 on pci4
miibus1: on bge0
bge0: Ethernet address: 00:0b:cd:e7:51:ba
bge0: watchdog timeout -- resetting
bge0: link state changed to DOWN
bge0: link state changed to UP
I initially pronounced the network
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 02:34:16PM +1000, John Marshall wrote:
> $ dmesg | grep bge
> bge0: mem
> 0xe820-0xe820 irq 17 at device 4.0 on pci4
> miibus1: on bge0
> bge0: Ethernet address: 00:0b:cd:e7:51:ba
> bge0: watchdog timeout -- resetting
> bge0: link state changed to DOWN
> bge0: link
> Very interesting data point. I wonder if this accounts for some of the
> inconsistency in the reporting from others. In any case, SCHED_ULE is
> still considered to be highly experimental. Hopefully it will get some
> more attention in the near future to bring it closer to production
> quality
David G Lawrence wrote:
Very interesting data point. I wonder if this accounts for some of the
inconsistency in the reporting from others. In any case, SCHED_ULE is
still considered to be highly experimental. Hopefully it will get some
more attention in the near future to bring it closer to pr
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>
> As far as SCHED_ULE goes, if you have issues with it, use SCHED_4BSD.
>
> Now, about watchdog timeouts in general -- there's a pending issue
> which is still under investigation. Please see this thread:
>
That was the "em" thread to which I referred in my original pos
> On Monday 02 October 2006 21:16, Roland Smith wrote:
>
> > Well, these are the same guys that bought a license from SCO for SCO's
> > alleged "IP" in Linux (and alledgedly in *BSD, before the settlement in
> > USL vs BSDi was made public). Apparently after a large
> > bribe^H^H^H^H^Hdiscount fro
34 matches
Mail list logo
