Re: bind round robin

2006-09-19 Thread Oliver Brandmueller
Hi. On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 02:00:23PM +0800, pinoyskull wrote: > One of my client's domain has multiple IPs for redundancy, i configured > his www as such > > wwwIN A 10.10.10.10 > wwwIN A 192.168.0.10 > > Is there a way to prioritize 10.10.10.10 over 192.168.0.10? How do i

Re: ufs - fsck_ffs problem

2006-09-19 Thread David Malone
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 01:47:34AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Alternate super block location: 160 > ** /dev/da0c (NO WRITE) > ** Last Mounted on > ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes > UNKNOWN FILE TYPE I=2 > CLEAR? no If inode 2 is messed up, then you may have lost the root directory of yo

Re: bind round robin

2006-09-19 Thread Dominic Marks
Oliver Brandmueller wrote: Hi. On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 02:00:23PM +0800, pinoyskull wrote: One of my client's domain has multiple IPs for redundancy, i configured his www as such wwwIN A 10.10.10.10 wwwIN A 192.168.0.10 Is there a way to prioritize 10.10.10.10 over 192.16

Re: bind round robin

2006-09-19 Thread Dominik Zalewski
On Tuesday 19 September 2006 11:50, Dominic Marks wrote: > Oliver Brandmueller wrote: > > Hi. > > > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 02:00:23PM +0800, pinoyskull wrote: > >> One of my client's domain has multiple IPs for redundancy, i configured > >> his www as such > >> > >> wwwIN A 10.10.10.10

Re: bind round robin

2006-09-19 Thread Dominic Marks
From the original message: [1] wwwIN A 10.10.10.10 wwwIN A 192.168.0.10 From pen homepage: "This is pen, a load balancer for "simple" tcp based protocols such as http or smtp." As I know DNS uses both tcp and udp protocols. From the posters excerpt it looks like t

Re: bind round robin

2006-09-19 Thread Stefan Lambrev
Dominic Marks wrote: From the original message: [1] wwwIN A 10.10.10.10 wwwIN A 192.168.0.10 From pen homepage: "This is pen, a load balancer for "simple" tcp based protocols such as http or smtp." As I know DNS uses both tcp and udp protocols. From the posters

Re: bind round robin

2006-09-19 Thread Fred Clift
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 02:00:23PM +0800, pinoyskull wrote: >> One of my client's domain has multiple IPs for redundancy, i configured >> his www as such >> >> wwwIN A 10.10.10.10 >> wwwIN A 192.168.0.10 >> >> Is there a way to prioritize 10.10.10.10 over 192.168.0.10? How do

Re: sed and comma-delimited file

2006-09-19 Thread Brooks Davis
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 12:26:54PM -0400, SigmaX asdf wrote: > Yo; > > I have a series of comma-delimited text files with fourteen columns of > data and several hundred rows. I want to use a short shell script to > strip them of the last 9 columns, leaving the same file but with just > five of it

Re: sed and comma-delimited file

2006-09-19 Thread Joan Picanyol i Puig
* SigmaX asdf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20060919 18:31]: > I have a series of comma-delimited text files with fourteen columns of > data and several hundred rows. I want to use a short shell script to > strip them of the last 9 columns, leaving the same file but with just > five of i

[panic] iwi - sleeping thread owns a non-sleepable lock

2006-09-19 Thread Kipp Holger
Hello, I encounter a very annyoing panic with iwi0 on 'my' hp laptop 'Compaq nx8220'. See kern/103368. Maybe the other open iwi-messages are related (kern/89926 etc.)? Is there a way to tell an Intel PRO/2200BG-card to only use 802.11b and not 11g without crashing the system? Additional feedba

Re: sed and comma-delimited file

2006-09-19 Thread N.J. Mann
On Tue 19 Sep 12:26, SigmaX asdf wrote: > I have a series of comma-delimited text files with fourteen columns of > data and several hundred rows. I want to use a short shell script to > strip them of the last 9 columns, leaving the same file but with just > five of its columns. I can do it in C+

df -kP != df -Pk

2006-09-19 Thread Andriy Gapon
It seems that -P flag to df resets previously specified -k for no good reason. POSIX expressly talks about -P and -k being used together. http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/df.html This is FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p2 i386. -- Andriy Gapon

Re: df -kP != df -Pk

2006-09-19 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 19/09/2006 19:17 Christian S.J. Peron said the following: > Andriy Gapon wrote: >> It seems that -P flag to df resets previously specified -k for no good >> reason. POSIX expressly talks about -P and -k being used together. >> http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/df.html >> >>

sed and comma-delimited file

2006-09-19 Thread SigmaX asdf
Yo; I have a series of comma-delimited text files with fourteen columns of data and several hundred rows. I want to use a short shell script to strip them of the last 9 columns, leaving the same file but with just five of its columns. I can do it in C++, but that seems like overkill. How would

Re: df -kP != df -Pk

2006-09-19 Thread Christian S.J. Peron
Andriy Gapon wrote: It seems that -P flag to df resets previously specified -k for no good reason. POSIX expressly talks about -P and -k being used together. http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/df.html This is FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p2 i386. Please test the attached patch a

Seg fault error this morning

2006-09-19 Thread Brian
I just cvsupped this morning after seeing the gzip announcement. During a buildworld, I get the below. I have replicated this a few times. /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libbfd/../../../../contrib/binutils/bfd/linker.c: In function `_bfd_default_link_order': /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libbf

Re: bind round robin

2006-09-19 Thread Doug Barton
Oliver Brandmueller wrote: > > DNS round robin is not about redundancy, the only thing you could have > that way is a kind of load balancing (not the most sophisticated way, > though). Whenever one of the servers fails, around half of the requests > still goes there and then times out/gets conn re

Re: bind round robin

2006-09-19 Thread Doug Barton
pinoyskull wrote: > Hi, > > One of my client's domain has multiple IPs for redundancy, This really isn't on topic for any of the FreeBSD lists, FYI. If the responses you have received so far haven't helped you, I would suggest that you write up a little more detail about what you're trying to ac

Re: sed and comma-delimited file

2006-09-19 Thread Julian Stacey
Reference: > From: "SigmaX asdf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 12:26:54 -0400 > Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "SigmaX asdf" wrote: > Yo; > > I have a series of comma-delimited text files with fourteen columns of > data and several hundred rows. I want to use

Re: sed and comma-delimited file

2006-09-19 Thread Oleg D.
SigmaX asdf wrote: Yo; I have a series of comma-delimited text files with fourteen columns of data and several hundred rows. I want to use a short shell script to strip them of the last 9 columns, leaving the same file but with just five of its columns. I can do it in C++, but that seems like

Re: sed and comma-delimited file

2006-09-19 Thread Thomas David Rivers
"SigmaX asdf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yo; > > I have a series of comma-delimited text files with fourteen columns of > data and several hundred rows. I want to use a short shell script to > strip them of the last 9 columns, leaving the same file but with just > five of its columns. I can do

Re: Seg fault error this morning

2006-09-19 Thread Don Wilde
On 9/19/06, Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I just cvsupped this morning after seeing the gzip announcement. During a buildworld, I get the below. I have replicated this a few times. buildworld from cvsup this morning (x86) worked fine for me, Brian, same time frame. Suggest you update sour

Kernel panic on boot (how to debug?)

2006-09-19 Thread Benjamin Lutz
Hello, Since I added a new P-ATA disk to my computer, FreeBSD 6.1/amd64 panics while booting: [...] acd0: DVDROM at ata0-master UDMA33 acd1: DVDR at ata0-slave UDMA33 ad2: 78533MB at ata1-master UDMA100 Fatal trap 18: integer divide fault while in kernel mode instruction pointer = 0x8:0

Re: bind round robin

2006-09-19 Thread Chris H.
Greetings all, ... Quoting Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Oliver Brandmueller wrote: DNS round robin is not about redundancy, the only thing you could have that way is a kind of load balancing (not the most sophisticated way, though). Whenever one of the servers fails, around half of the req

Re: Seg fault error this morning

2006-09-19 Thread Brian
Don Wilde wrote: On 9/19/06, *Brian* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: I just cvsupped this morning after seeing the gzip announcement. During a buildworld, I get the below. I have replicated this a few times. buildworld from cvsup this morning (x86) worked fi

PERC trouble?

2006-09-19 Thread Ivan Voras
I had a chance today to play a little with a server that was later passed on for deployment, and one of the thing I tried to do was create something unusual - three disk groups/virtual disks on the PERC5/i RAID controller, with a single drive in each group (entered as RAID0). All went fine until I

Re: Seg fault error this morning

2006-09-19 Thread David Wolfskill
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 02:41:29PM -0700, Brian wrote: > Don Wilde wrote: > > > >On 9/19/06, *Brian* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > >I just cvsupped this morning after seeing the gzip > >announcement. During > >a buildworld, I get the below. I have replica

Re: PERC trouble?

2006-09-19 Thread Paul Saab
this was fixed after 6.1-RELEASE. You need to grab the driver from -stable. Ivan Voras wrote: I had a chance today to play a little with a server that was later passed on for deployment, and one of the thing I tried to do was create something unusual - three disk groups/virtual disks on the PER

Re: bind round robin

2006-09-19 Thread Chris H.
Greetings, ... Quoting "Chris H." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Greetings all, ... Quoting Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Oliver Brandmueller wrote: DNS round robin is not about redundancy, the only thing you could have that way is a kind of load balancing (not the most sophisticated way, though).

Re: Seg fault error this morning

2006-09-19 Thread Brian
David Wolfskill wrote: On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 02:41:29PM -0700, Brian wrote: Don Wilde wrote: On 9/19/06, *Brian* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: I just cvsupped this morning after seeing the gzip announcement. During a buildworld, I get the below. I h

Re: Seg fault error this morning

2006-09-19 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 02:41:29PM -0700, Brian wrote: > Don Wilde wrote: > > > >On 9/19/06, *Brian* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > >I just cvsupped this morning after seeing the gzip > >announcement. During > >a buildworld, I get the below. I have replica

Re: sed and comma-delimited file

2006-09-19 Thread Freddie Cash
On Tue, September 19, 2006 9:26 am, SigmaX asdf wrote: > I have a series of comma-delimited text files with fourteen columns > of data and several hundred rows. I want to use a short shell script > to strip them of the last 9 columns, leaving the same file but with > just five of its columns. I c

Re: isc-dhcpd and jails bound to an aliased ip

2006-09-19 Thread Russell Jackson
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 01:08:28PM -0700, Russell Jackson wrote: > Attempting to run isc-dhcpd (using USE_SOCKETS) inside a jail > bound to an aliased ip does not appear to work. The process never seems > to recieve any broadcast traffic; however, it does see unicast traffic > as would be expected.

6.2/pxe blues, was Re: pxe boot size limit?

2006-09-19 Thread Danny Braniss
> it seems that pxeboot has a limit with respect to the kernel size, > which prevents the kernel to get loaded, the error printed is > slightly misleading. > > the solution is to make a kernel with loadable modules, instead of > compiled in. not entirely true :-( but changing kernel size has diff

Re: loader can't load kernel on FreeBSD 6.1-p6.

2006-09-19 Thread Nikolay Pavlov
On Saturday, 16 September 2006 at 9:48:09 +0300, Nikolay Pavlov wrote: > Hi, folks. > While booting 6.1-RELEASE-p6 i have this error on /boot/loader stage: > > can't load kernel > > ls shows nothing... > > lsdev shows me: > disk devices: > disk0: BIOS drive C: > disk0s1: FFS bad

Re: bind round robin

2006-09-19 Thread Doug Barton
Chris H. wrote: > Greetings all, > ... > Quoting Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> Oliver Brandmueller wrote: >>> >>> DNS round robin is not about redundancy, the only thing you could have >>> that way is a kind of load balancing (not the most sophisticated way, >>> though). Whenever one of th