Hello everyone!
I want to thank all of you for ideas and support!
Finally I've resolved this annoying problem with "Unexplained power off".
Right were those who supposed hardware problem. I've replaced PSU, and
everything is OK - system is stable under any load...
Android Andrew [:] wrote:
Tha
Failing NFS mounts with the -b option take a lot of time,
because they fork AFTER an attempt has failed. And that
normally takes a lot of time.
So I have written that patch, which fixes the behaviour
by forking even before the first attempt is made.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=10308
On Sep 10, 2006, at 3:44 PM, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
I checked both fsck and fsck_ffs man page, and don't see anything
in either ... is there some way I can check if a file system is
actually 'clean', without running fsck?
run dump? not sure how picky that is.
On 12:34 Sun 10 Sep, Tobias Roth wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 11:22:08PM +0200, Daniel Bond wrote:
> > On 14:13 Fri 08 Sep, Tobias Roth wrote:
> > >
> > > How is this better/different from just adding the gbde device to
> > > /etc/fstab and have it mounted along with all other filesystems?
> >
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 09:10:26PM +0200, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> I just tried to load my standard kernel from the boot blocks (instead
> of using loader(8)), but I either get a hang before the kernel prints
> anything, or a BTX halted. Is this still supposed to work in 6-
> stable, or has it
Daniel Bond wrote:
> Maybee this should be updated in the handbook then? (Along with the placement
> for the lockfile, since GBDE defaultly looks in /etc/.lock (not:
> /etc/gbde/))
>
> I could do it if I knew how.
You don't have to know docbook to contribute to the docs. You can write up
your s
I would like to discuss a little bit more about UDP performance. I've
made some tests and the results may have some value here.
In this test is easy to see that there is something different in the
FreeBSD 6 branch.
I made a benchmark with bind 9.3.2 (without threads support) and nsd
3.0.1 (1 serv