Hi,
I've ran into sort of a snag with building a 2T file server.
Given all the good press here for 3ware and the talk to the guys at the CeBIT
I decided to go for a 9550SX-LP8.
With that I bought a ASUS serverboard: K8N-LR with 165 dual core opteron.
In itself is this a combo that I thing woul
The Areca cards I can recommend. Highpoint 1820a is surprisingly good
for its price and the later cards have better performance still apparently.
N.B. Use the min stripe size when creating the array for max performance
with this card under FreeBSD.
Steve
Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Hi,
I've
Hi All,
I've updated from amd64 6.1-RELEASE to 6-STABLE.
All works fine. The only problem: when xmms or
firefox starts the following message appears:
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /lib/libpthread.so.2: Undefined symbol "_malloc_prefork"
The Ports tree is fresh. Both xmms and firefox have been rebuilt.
W
Steven Hartland wrote:
The Areca cards I can recommend. Highpoint 1820a is surprisingly good
for its price and the later cards have better performance still apparently.
N.B. Use the min stripe size when creating the array for max performance
with this card under FreeBSD.
I was more thinking alo
Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Steven Hartland wrote:
The Areca cards I can recommend. Highpoint 1820a is surprisingly good
for its price and the later cards have better performance still
apparently. N.B. Use the min stripe size when creating the array for
max performance with this card under FreeBS
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, S.N.Grigoriev wrote:
Hi All,
I've updated from amd64 6.1-RELEASE to 6-STABLE.
All works fine. The only problem: when xmms or
firefox starts the following message appears:
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /lib/libpthread.so.2: Undefined symbol "_malloc_prefork"
The Ports tree is fres
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 12:02:47PM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
> Steven Hartland wrote:
> >The Areca cards I can recommend. Highpoint 1820a is surprisingly good
> >for its price and the later cards have better performance still apparently.
> >N.B. Use the min stripe size when creating the arr
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 07:17:40AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> Your system is not consistent. There is no _malloc_prefork()
> (or _malloc_foofork()) in -stable; it only exists in -current.
> You've got -current libraries (at least libpthread) on -stable.
> libpthread is installed in /usr/lib in
I find it hard to believe nobody has mentioned 3ware, they are a bit
more expensive but you pay for top notch quality, stability...
Their newer cards support PCI-X and SATA II /w hotswap.
-Greg
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.f
Greg Martin wrote:
I find it hard to believe nobody has mentioned 3ware, they are a bit
more expensive but you pay for top notch quality, stability...
Their newer cards support PCI-X and SATA II /w hotswap.
Well the message started by saying that I got caught by a 3ware card that did
not want
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 10:05:18AM -0500, Greg Martin wrote:
> I find it hard to believe nobody has mentioned 3ware, they are a bit
> more expensive but you pay for top notch quality, stability...
>
> Their newer cards support PCI-X and SATA II /w hotswap.
BTW, just as a data point, my Areca cont
> Well the message started by saying that I got caught by a 3ware card that did
> not want to play nice with me.
> So I guess nobody deared suggesting another 3ware card.
> ;)
My apologies, I now understand its a hardware issue. Before you toss
the 3ware completely try the following (althou
On 8/23/06, Willem Jan Withagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I've ran into sort of a snag with building a 2T file server.
Given all the good press here for 3ware and the talk to the guys at the CeBIT
I decided to go for a 9550SX-LP8.
With that I bought a ASUS serverboard: K8N-LR with 165 dual
Greg Martin wrote:
Well the message started by saying that I got caught by a 3ware card that did
not want to play nice with me.
So I guess nobody deared suggesting another 3ware card.
;)
My apologies, I now understand its a hardware issue. Before you toss
the 3ware completely try the foll
On 8/23/06, Bob Willcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 12:02:47PM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
> Steven Hartland wrote:
> >The Areca cards I can recommend. Highpoint 1820a is surprisingly good
> >for its price and the later cards have better performance still apparently.
On 8/23/06, Nikolas Britton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/23/06, Bob Willcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 12:02:47PM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
> > Steven Hartland wrote:
> > >The Areca cards I can recommend. Highpoint 1820a is surprisingly good
> > >for its price
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I compiled net/krb5 today on my 6.1-STABLE machine. As I tried to
initialize Kerberos with '/usr/local/bin/kinit @ I got
the following error:
kinit in free(): error: junk pointer, too high to make sense
Abort trap: 6 (core dumped)
The same
On Aug 23, 2006, at 12:00 PM, Matthias Schuendehuette wrote:
I compiled net/krb5 today on my 6.1-STABLE machine. As I tried to
initialize Kerberos with '/usr/local/bin/kinit @ I
got the following error:
kinit in free(): error: junk pointer, too high to make sense
Abort trap: 6 (core dumped)
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 11:07:45PM +0300, Todorov @ Paladin wrote:
> Also - why portupgrade is not always aware of
> previously chosen options for a port build?
>
It depends. If options are OPTIONS (in the ports sense), they
are saved and independent of portupgrade. If options are
makefile optio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Chuck,
Am 23.08.2006 um 21:25 schrieb Chuck Swiger:
Sure your hardware is OK? Try running memtest86 or a hardware
diagnostic from your vendor, and double-check your fans & PSU...
Hmm, I fear I'm never sure...
But I'll try to compile krb5 on
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 11:07:45PM +0300, Todorov @ Paladin wrote:
>> Also - why portupgrade is not always aware of
>> previously chosen options for a port build?
>>
> It depends. If options are OPTIONS (in the ports sense), they
> are saved and independent of portupgrade.
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 12:23:00PM -0700, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> In practice, however, pretty much all software nowadays depends on
> shared libraries, so it's reasonable to do a "pkg_delete -a" after
> upgrading to a new major version of FreeBSD, and then reinstall all
> of the ports you us
On Aug 23, 2006, at 4:41 PM, Greg Byshenk wrote:
As a possible point of clarification, my comments earlier (and, I
suspect similar comments of others) were not meant to imply that one
should not rebuild ports after a major upgrade, but only that one need
not do so _before_ upgrading.
[...probabl
Chuck Swiger:
>FreeBSD's COMPAT stuff will let you run binaries
>compiled against an older version of FreeBSD just fine for almost all
>circumstances. However, as soon as you try to install a new port
>which depends on something already installed, or upgrade anything,
>you pretty much real
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 09:23:00AM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
> The Areca cards I can recommend. Highpoint 1820a is surprisingly good
Many many years ago I bought a HighPoint HPT366 ATA66 controller.
Thought its a good deal because it was cheap.
Thought, an ATA interface can't be that complicat
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 07:17:40 -0400 (EDT)
Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, S.N.Grigoriev wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've updated from amd64 6.1-RELEASE to 6-STABLE.
> > All works fine. The only problem: when xmms or
> > firefox starts the following message appears
On 8/24/06, Andreas Klemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 09:23:00AM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
> The Areca cards I can recommend. Highpoint 1820a is surprisingly good
Many many years ago I bought a HighPoint HPT366 ATA66 controller.
Thought its a good deal because it was c
27 matches
Mail list logo
