Hi,
i had the same problem. See my thread on the freebsd-fs mailinglist
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2006-July/002060.html
After some research i use the attached patch against ncp_sock.c.
So it is not the real solution to this problem it only avoids the panics. I'm
using it
Hi!
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 10:49:27PM -0300, User Freebsd wrote:
> Official word from Adaptec is that FreeBSD is no longer a supported
> platform, so, I either live with the deadlocks, or try and figure out a
> suitable replacement for the card ...
That's really really bad news. Oddly, ICP Vo
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 10:49:27PM -0300, User Freebsd wrote:
>
> I have a remote server, running the above RAID controller, that, as most
> ppl here have seen over the past few weeks, is causing endless headaches
> ...
>
> Official word from Adaptec is that FreeBSD is no longer a supported
>
Hello!
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 09:51:59AM +0200, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
> That's really really bad news. Oddly, ICP Vortex Germany told me
> the opposite wr/t to their new line of cards. They said, they
> were working on full FreeBSD support. I'll check what they have
> to say about the GDT con
On Tue, 2006-Aug-01 08:23:43 +0200, Lasse Edlund wrote:
>I had some important files on a less than 1 year old 300gb Maxtor
>harddrive (ad5) when it stopped working. The harddrive had been working
>ok, and it had been in the computer all the time, so no risk physical
>damage.
Have you touched anyth
Le 1 août 2006 à 08:23, Lasse Edlund a écrit :
I have an old Pentium III computer with FreeBSD 5.3 and I am using
GEOM
GBDE encryption on a few IDE-disks that are mounted on a PCI-ide
controller.
I had some important files on a less than 1 year old 300gb Maxtor
harddrive (ad5) when it stopped
Dear Nikolas Britton,
Thanks for your comment about UNIX format with arcmsr.
I will change its coding style at 1.20.00.13.
Generally, areca put its release driver on its ftp site
ftp://ftp.areca.com.tw .
But this site maintained by areca support team.
And the driver always need passed their lon
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Graham Menhennitt wrote:
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
current process = 479 (mountd)
I have the same panic reproducibly. Shutting off nfs_server_enable (i.e.
mountd) in rc.conf prevents it. This is with 6-STABLE cvsupped yesterday.
I'll get some more
Hi Folks,
I have 4 GEOM_BDE encrypted partitions in one FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE
Server. Since the server anormally shutdown (power cut), one of
partitions isn't more available.
Here is the partitions:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /dev]# ls -laF /etc/gbde/
total 12
drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Mar 23
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Robert Watson wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Graham Menhennitt wrote:
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
current process = 479 (mountd)
I have the same panic reproducibly. Shutting off nfs_server_enable (i.e.
mountd) in rc.conf prevents it. This is with 6-STAB
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
Hi!
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 10:49:27PM -0300, User Freebsd wrote:
Official word from Adaptec is that FreeBSD is no longer a supported
platform, so, I either live with the deadlocks, or try and figure out a
suitable replacement for the card ...
Th
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Christian Brueffer wrote:
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 10:49:27PM -0300, User Freebsd wrote:
I have a remote server, running the above RAID controller, that, as most
ppl here have seen over the past few weeks, is causing endless headaches
...
Official word from Adaptec is that
(Please do *not* crosspost.)
Am 01.08.2006 um 15:36 schrieb Felipe Neuwald:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /dev]# ls /dev/ad5s1c
ls: /dev/ad5s1c: No such file or directory
Is the actual disk probed? (dmesg output should show that.)
If the hardware is still detected, what does fdisk say about the
slices
A quick follow up on this email ... please note that I have not, in this
email, pointed to anything but the iir(4) driver, and, more specifically,
the GDT controller card ...
I have been using Adaptec products since the early 90's, and, until
upgrading to FreeBSD 6.x, *never* had a complaint
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
Hello!
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 09:51:59AM +0200, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
That's really really bad news. Oddly, ICP Vortex Germany told me
the opposite wr/t to their new line of cards. They said, they
were working on full FreeBSD support. I'll chec
Stefan,
Yes, the disk have been detected:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /home/felipe]# dmesg | grep ad5
ad5: 194481MB at ata2-slave UDMA66
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /home/felipe]# ls -laF /dev/ad5
crw-r- 1 root operator0, 62 Aug 1 10:39 /dev/ad5
And here is the fdisk output:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /home/f
Am 01.08.2006 um 16:41 schrieb Felipe Neuwald:
Stefan,
Yes, the disk have been detected:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /home/felipe]# dmesg | grep ad5
ad5: 194481MB at ata2-slave UDMA66
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /home/felipe]# ls -laF /dev/ad5
crw-r- 1 root operator0, 62 Aug 1 10:39 /dev/ad5
And he
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 12:33:58AM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Last week I got a laptop from a few friends of mine with a broken
> screen. I removed the screen from the device and connected a regular CRT
> to it to install FreeBSD 6.1 on it for serving as a jukebox (silent,
> doesn't co
Hello!
> 'k, just to clarify here ... the new products won't be based on the iir(4)
> driver then?
Yes, they won't.
> Basically, should the iir(4) driver be considered EOE also?
As far as Adaptec and ICP Vortex are concerned, yes. Since the
driver is Open Source, there is no enforced EOE, just
Ok guys, time for a small breather here. All these claims about
EoE and orphanage and whatnot are a bit premature and underinformed.
First, the iir driver is being worked on when the need arises. Several
bugs were fixed in it a few months ago, and until Mark's recent series
of mails on it, no ot
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Scott Long wrote:
Ok guys, time for a small breather here. All these claims about
EoE and orphanage and whatnot are a bit premature and underinformed.
First, the iir driver is being worked on when the need arises. Several
bugs were fixed in it a few months ago, and until Ma
Hello Bruno,
* Bruno Ducrot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This means you can't get configuration for speedstep on this processor
> via ACPI because something is broken into the bios.
>
> But since we have that:
>
> > CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1500MHz (1498.73-MHz 686-class CPU)
> > O
Hello All,
I have problem with make buildworld on my 2 different servers
FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE/i386/RELENG_6 (CVSup'ed today)
cut here===
===> lib/libpam/modules/pam_self (all)
cc -O2 -pipe -march=pentium4 -I/usr/src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_self/../../../..>
building static pam_se
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 04:47:16PM -0700, Sam Leffler wrote:
> Andrew Thompson wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 01:28:12PM -0700, Sam Leffler wrote:
> >> Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> >>> Oh? Sounds interesting, where can I find these patches?
> >> The work has always been in perforce.freebsd.org
On Mon, July 31, 2006 11:05 pm, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
> On Jul 31, 2006, at 7:49 PM, User Freebsd wrote:
>> I have a remote server, running the above RAID controller, that, as
>> most ppl here have seen over the past few weeks, is causing
>> endless headaches ...
>>
>> Official word
On Monday 31 July 2006 09:35, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> John Baldwin wrote:
> > Mike Jakubik wrote:
> > > I tried that, unfortunately it does not work. All i want to know is if
> > > this a shortcoming of freebsd or the motherboard, if its the later, i
> > > will contact the manufacturer.
> >
On Monday 31 July 2006 15:15, ejc wrote:
> I am having a problem getting ncplogin to work on my 6.1-stable
> system. When I run ncplogin I get the following panic (hand
> transcribed):
>
>
> Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
> cpuid = 1; apic id = 01
> fault virtual address
On 8/1/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
i had the same problem. See my thread on the freebsd-fs mailinglist
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2006-July/002060.html
After some research i use the attached patch against ncp_sock.c.
So it is not the real solution
On Tuesday 01 August 2006 14:28, ejc wrote:
> On 8/1/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > i had the same problem. See my thread on the freebsd-fs mailinglist
> >
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2006-July/002060.html
> >
> >
> > After some research i
Apologies if posted to wrong list, the rc.d script for named chowns
/etc/namedb to root:wheel if set to bind:bind why is this? A slave
named server running as bind user cannot download new slave zones if
dir ownership is root or update it if file ownerships are root which I
sometimes see.
Chris
> Apologies if posted to wrong list, the rc.d script for named chowns
> /etc/namedb to root:wheel if set to bind:bind why is this? A slave
> named server running as bind user cannot download new slave zones if
> dir ownership is root or update it if file ownerships are root which I
> sometimes see
> Apologies if posted to wrong list, the rc.d script for named chowns
> /etc/namedb to root:wheel if set to bind:bind why is this? A slave
> named server running as bind user cannot download new slave zones if
> dir ownership is root or update it if file ownerships are root which I
> sometimes se
Hi, Scott!
> Ok guys, time for a small breather here. All these claims about
> EoE and orphanage and whatnot are a bit premature and underinformed.
I only stated that according to ICP Vortex Germany the
GDT products are EOE and ICP Vortex will not provide an
updated driver for FreeBSD. Nothing m
33 matches
Mail list logo
