On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 08:49:27PM +0100, Frederic Praca wrote:
> Hello and happy new year,
> I still got the same problem that is described there
> (http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1706.84.247.145.210.1132137934.squirrel
> ).
> My uname is :
> FreeBSD coruscant.dnsalias.net 6.0-STABLE FreeBS
Absolute BSD, in the Tweaking Kernel Performance section of chapter 4,
recommends increasing the number of mbufs for high network servers, by
setting the NMBCLUSTERS option in the kernel.
Is this still a good idea/possible in 6 stable, and if so is there a
sysctl variable for it, or does it st
Jeffrey Williams wrote:
>
> Is this still a good idea/possible in 6 stable, and if so is there
> a sysctl variable for it, or does it still need to be done in a
> custom kernel?
perhaps kern.ipc.nmbclusters is what you're looking for.
- Nick.
___
fr
Yep, thank you sir you are a scholar and gentleman
- Jeff
Nicklas B. Westerlund wrote:
Jeffrey Williams wrote:
Is this still a good idea/possible in 6 stable, and if so is there
a sysctl variable for it, or does it still need to be done in a
custom kernel?
perhaps kern.ipc.nmbclusters i
Charles Sprickman wrote:
Hello,
I recently made the jump to -stable from 6.0 on a box that I'm looking to
bring into production as soon as 6.1 hits. Everything seems fine so far
but for one issue that I am guessing is related to the rc changes in
-stable.
This host has two jails, both star
I have set hidessid option to an Intersil PRISM 2.5 based cart, acting
as hostap, and the ssid stills gets broadcasted, aparently. Other
FreeBSD systems and the Windows software supplied by the vendor can find
the SSID while scanning.
I would like to know if hidessid should hide it in ordinary
Hi,
Are there any SATA RAID card controller for PCI Express bus working with
FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE?
Paulo.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROT
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 02:10:33PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> I get this on 7-current as well. Copying the relevant bits from libmd
> and compiling it myself, I get the same behaviour. The fact that this
> exits virtually instantly strongly suggests that it is broken (rather
> than the shared v
At 09:24 AM 10/01/2006, Paulo Fragoso wrote:
Hi,
Are there any SATA RAID card controller for PCI Express bus working
with FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE?
I have been using the Areca cards on a couple of production boxes
with good results so far. They work out of the box with FreeBSD 5.4 and above.
h
Charles Sprickman wrote:
Hello,
I recently made the jump to -stable from 6.0 on a box that I'm looking
to bring into production as soon as 6.1 hits. Everything seems fine so
far but for one issue that I am guessing is related to the rc changes in
-stable.
For rc.conf in the jails, try chan
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 10:34:16AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> Charles Sprickman wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >I recently made the jump to -stable from 6.0 on a box that I'm looking
> >to bring into production as soon as 6.1 hits. Everything seems fine so
> >far but for one issue that I am guessing is
On Tuesday 10 January 2006 16:02, Patrick Tracanelli wrote:
> I have set hidessid option to an Intersil PRISM 2.5 based cart, acting
> as hostap, and the ssid stills gets broadcasted, aparently. Other
> FreeBSD systems and the Windows software supplied by the vendor can find
> the SSID while scanni
I'm regularly running into a situation on 5.4 (current as of a few
weeks ago) where a multi-threaded process comes to a screeching halt
due to a vnode lock dependency chain. In other words, many of the
threads have various vnodes locked and are trying to acquire another.
When you chase down to th
Howdy.
I took 6.0 for a test drive today and was disappointed to find that
vinum/gvinum are still in disarray. For example there is a man page for
vinum, but only a gvinum binary. gvinum help still lists lots of old vinum
commands that are not implemented in gvinum. Lots of basic things I try
from
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 10:38:29PM -0500, Brian Szymanski wrote:
> I took 6.0 for a test drive today and was disappointed to find that
> vinum/gvinum are still in disarray. For example there is a man page for
> vinum, but only a gvinum binary. gvinum help still lists lots of old vinum
> comman
15 matches
Mail list logo