I have installed a FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE router, with mpd4 (for pptp
clients) and with ng_netflow for traffic collecting, the machine also
performs NAT be means of pfnat.
But my machine occasionally freezes. It does not respond to echo
requests over ethernet and it even does not respond to keyboard.
On Saturday 31 December 2005 22:14, Sam Leffler wrote:
> Bill Paul wrote:
> >>yes, i can load if_ath, wireless card is found and i can set it up as
> >>ath0, but i still have no signal (and there are many ap's - i can see
> >>with different pcmcia card)
> >
> > I think the wireless enable switch c
On 3 Jan, Greg Rivers wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Don Lewis wrote:
>> Pid 87117 is playing with buf 0xdc76fe30 which is not locked, and is
>> sleeping on the buf's b_xflags member. It looks like 87117 is waiting
>> for an in-progress write to complete. There are a large number of other
>> send
Hello!
in view of kdump (and ktrace ...), there will be read the file
/var/run/ld-elf.so.hints
but its contents not...
Or why is every programm trying to load every library from the same
search path? e.g. tries first /lib, etc.
this happens at least to 5-STABLE and 6-STABLE
shouldn't be it m
I have installed a FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE router, with mpd4 (for pptp
clients) and with ng_netflow for traffic collecting, the machine also
performs NAT be means of pfnat.
But my machine occasionally freezes. It does not respond to echo
requests over ethernet and it even does not respond to keyboard
I had rpcbind running with on two interfaces like this:
rpcbind -h 192.168.100.200 -h 10.0.0.9
Now, I changed rpcbind_flags in /etc/rc.conf to just have the first
address, and I restarted rpcbind. the process list from ps shows it
is running like this:
rpcbind -h 192.168.100.200
Yet nmap
FWIW, this question could probably have been asked on freebsd-questions@
since it doesn't really pertain specifically to an issue about a stable
branch, but that's not the end of the world.
Vivek Khera wrote:
I had rpcbind running with on two interfaces like this:
rpcbind -h 192.168.100.200 -
On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, Vivek Khera wrote:
VK> I had rpcbind running with on two interfaces like this:
VK>
VK> rpcbind -h 192.168.100.200 -h 10.0.0.9
VK>
VK> Now, I changed rpcbind_flags in /etc/rc.conf to just have the first address,
VK> and I restarted rpcbind. the process list from ps shows it i
On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, Doug Barton wrote:
DB> > rpcbind -h 192.168.100.200 -h 10.0.0.9
DB> >
DB> > Now, I changed rpcbind_flags in /etc/rc.conf to just have the first
DB> > address, and I restarted rpcbind. the process list from ps shows it is
DB> > running like this:
DB> >
DB> > rpcbind -h 192.16
On Jan 4, 2006, at 2:41 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
What does 'sockstat | grep rpcbind' tell you?
# sockstat | grep rpcbind
root rpcbind11382 5 stream /var/run/rpcbind.sock
root rpcbind11382 6 dgram -> /var/run/logpriv
root rpcbind11382 7 udp4 127.0.0.1:111 *:
Pete French wrote:
What I am trying to decide is whether there any point in making the jump
from a very stable RELENG_5 system to RELENG_6. AIUI the ULE scheduler
and it's associated options optimize the use of multiple CPUs and by
staying with 4BSD I'm not getting the best performance from my
Hi,
I just installed the latest mgetty and ran it, then found it wasn't talking to
my modem so I disabled it in /etc/ttys and killed the process.
I ran fstat /dev/cuad0 to check it was dead and fstat got stuck in the devfs
state. It seems that everything else was stuck too and now the machine is
I compiled the kernel with options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD, and this is what I
still get:
ipfw2 initialized, divert disabled, rule-based forwarding disabled, default
to deny, logging disabled
Any help with this would be appreciated.
--
DJ Fadyeyev
Founder - e-Plutonia
Hi,
I cannot "make buildkernel" after cvsup from 5.3 to 6-stable doing src-all and
ports-all in my cvsup supfile. Then I built my world. Now I get this message
when I try "make buildkernel":
-snip
386/conf/GENERIC
ERROR: version of config(8) does not match kernel!
config version = 500013,
Trying to build kernel with the following conf file, output follows, HELP!
* CONF FILE **
#
# FreeBSD: src/sys/i386/conf/OENS, v1.0, Jeffrey Williams, 01042006-01
#
machine i386
cpu I686_CPU
ident OENS
#optionsSCHED_ULE # ULE schedule
Jeffrey Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Trying to build kernel with the following conf file, output follows, HELP!
You have ural(4) in your kernel, but no wlan(4).
The ural(4) manual says that wlan(4) is required.
In general, the way to figure these things out is to start from the
GENERIC
Thanks,
I just now saw that myself, being the dilnob I am, I searched the
mailing list, relnotes, errata, and forums, but didn't actually read my
own kernel conf file until after a I sent my email.
Thanks for swift response though
Jeff
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Jeffrey Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTE
> Jeffrey Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Trying to build kernel with the following conf file, output follows,
HELP!
>
> You have ural(4) in your kernel, but no wlan(4).
> The ural(4) manual says that wlan(4) is required.
>
> In general, the way to figure these things out is to start fro
On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, Don Lewis wrote:
How about "show buffer 0xdc76fe30"?
db> show buffer 0xdc76fe30
buf at 0xdc76fe30
b_flags = 0x20a0
b_error = 0, b_bufsize = 16384, b_bcount = 16384, b_resid = 0
b_bufobj = (0xc8985610), b_data = 0xe1d6b000, b_blkno = 365086368
lockstatus = 0, excl count
I'm currently running 6.0-STABLE on my IBM Thinkpad 600e 2645-4AU with
a custom kernel. I updated the
BIOS to the latest version that IBM offers ( INET36WW
http://www-307.ibm.com/pc/support/site.wss/document.do?lndocid=DSHY-46HLKQ ).
I have two issues that I would love to get some hints on how to
20 matches
Mail list logo
