Re: Strange problem with kldload and pf

On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 11:50:06AM -0500, Matt Emmerton wrote: > Sometimes kldload fails mysteriously, and more helpful error messages are > dumped in /var/log/messages. But only sometimes. Ah, got it: Dec 28 15:39:37 candlerb kernel: link_elf: symbol in6_cksum undefined So I'm guessing the sta

Re: Strange problem with kldload and pf

On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 08:21:46AM +, Brian Candler wrote: > On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 11:50:06AM -0500, Matt Emmerton wrote: > > Sometimes kldload fails mysteriously, and more helpful error messages are > > dumped in /var/log/messages. But only sometimes. > > Ah, got it: > > Dec 28 15:39:37 c

Re: i915drm

Le Jeudi 29 Décembre 2005 07:59, Gianmarco Giovannelli a écrit : > The plain xorg 6.8.2 seems not be able to > recognize the card (at least the mine). > Do you have used the patch : > http://apocalyptech.com/linux/nc6120/xorg-6.8.2-i810.patch > to compile it ? No it works out of the box for me.

Re: Help For upgrading Releng4.11 stable to 6.0 stable

On Thu, Dec 29, 2005, Yudhi Yuniadhi wrote: > I have Machine 4.11 Stable. Now, I want upgrade to 6.0. > # uname -srm > FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE i386 > > How step for ugrade form 4.11 stable to 6.0 stable > How step is the same with use cvsup ??? 1. Upgrade from 4 to 5 with a procedure similar to

Re: RELENG_6: Which scheduler for SMP?

At 23:20 2005-12-28, Kris Kennaway wrote: Mike Jakubik wrote: Mark Ovens wrote: I've never had any success with the ULE scheduler on my dual Athlon box running RELENG_5; it was so unstable it made Windows 3.1 look stable. In fact my current build, cvsup'd a couple of days ago, won't even bo

[sparc64] installation fails during netboot on ultra5 and ultra2

Hi, I'm trying to install FreeBSD6 on an ultra5 and an ultra2 machine troughout netboot. This is what happen on both machine after some minutes of interaction with the netboot server: Sun Ultra 5/10 UPA/PCI (UltraSPARC-IIi 360MHz), No Keyboard OpenBoot 3.19, 128 MB (60 ns) memory installed, Seria

Re: HEADS UP: MFC of local_startup changes to rc.d complete

El Lunes, 26 de Diciembre de 2005 09:53, Doug Barton escribió: > Jose M Rodriguez wrote: > > But this doesn't solve the real problem. We've lost a reference > > model about rc and the interaction with the base system and ports. > > I'm not sure what that last sentence means. > Form our old rc sy

Re: HEADS UP: MFC of local_startup changes to rc.d complete

Em Qui, 2005-12-29 às 16:41 +0100, Jose M Rodriguez escreveu: > A lot of things has been changed, an now, it's really hard to get an > idea about the boot process and the order used to launch the > components. I'm sorry if I am saying something that is out of the discussion, I didn't see the

Re: RELENG_6: Which scheduler for SMP?

On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 08:45:34AM -0500, Ian Lord wrote: > Then what's the point of ULE if it's slower then 4BSD? It's still under development. The intention is that it be faster. mcl ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.or

Re: HEADS UP: MFC of local_startup changes to rc.d complete

El Jueves, 29 de Diciembre de 2005 16:54, Carlos Eduardo G. Carvalho escribió: > Em Qui, 2005-12-29 às 16:41 +0100, Jose M Rodriguez escreveu: > > A lot of things has been changed, an now, it's really hard to get > > an idea about the boot process and the order used to launch the > > components.

Re: mountd fails intermittently

Michael Sperber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm running 5.4-STABLE (about two weeks old), and have just set up an > NFS server for the first time. Remote mounts sometimes work fine, and > sometimes fail. > > The symptoms are that "showmount -e" sez > > showmount: can't do exports rpc > > and

Re: HEADS UP: MFC of local_startup changes to rc.d complete

Jose M Rodriguez wrote: El Lunes, 26 de Diciembre de 2005 09:53, Doug Barton escribió: Jose M Rodriguez wrote: But this doesn't solve the real problem. We've lost a reference model about rc and the interaction with the base system and ports. I'm not sure what that last sentence means. Form

Re: File system corruption with ATA RAID-1 on 6-STABLE

On Wed, 21 Dec 2005, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote: On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 12:06:00PM -0600, Seán C. Farley wrote: I installed 6.0 on a system with two SATA drives in RAID-1. 5.4 is installed on a standard IDE channel. All appeared to work well until sometime after updating the system to 6

Re: RELENG_6: Which scheduler for SMP?

Mark Ovens wrote: I've never had any success with the ULE scheduler on my dual Athlon box running RELENG_5; it was so unstable it made Windows 3.1 look stable. In fact my current build, cvsup'd a couple of days ago, won't even boot with ULE. From what I remember, ULE was intended to become t

6.0-STABLE can't see floppy drive for KLD loading

Trying to install 6.0-STABLE on a Supermicro 5014C-MT server with a P8SCT motherboard. Also installed is a 3Ware 9550SX sata raid controller. The latest 6.0-STABLE snap from 12-08-05 does not have the version of the TWA driver which supports the 9550SX so it would be necessary to kldload the bina

"runtime went backwards" message in logs

I recently noticed strange message in the logs: | +++ /tmp/security.YBOfj4NZ Tue Dec 27 03:10:48 2005 | +calcru: runtime went backwards from 226760439 usec to 226756967 usec for pid 612 (sendmail) | +calcru: runtime went backwards from 226760439 usec to 226756967 usec for pid 612 (sendmail)

Re: "runtime went backwards" message in logs

> PS. Not sure if this have anything to do with it (the message mentions CPU > time, not the clock), but I'm running a ntp daemon, to synchronize time... Highly likely it has a Lot to do with it :-) Maybe the master time server had `date` run manually, or otherwise shifted, or came back on net aft

Re: "runtime went backwards" message in logs

Hello Julian, Thursday, December 29, 2005, 4:39:55 PM, you wrote: > Highly likely it has a Lot to do with it :-) Maybe the master time > server had `date` run manually, or otherwise shifted, or came back > on net after an outage, & the systems noticed drifted time & corrected etc. > man n