For what its worth I use Norton Ghost to regularly set up a classroom of
machines with FreeBSD 5.3, mostly because other teachers put Windoze
stuff on the same boxes so the Ghost setup makes sense.
Ghost doesn't understand UFS but doesn't need to. It just takes a block
by block copy of the whole p
I happened to have received a 'new' machine, and wanted to see what its
IO system was capable of. So took the opportunity to run 4.10 and 5.4
against each other a few times. (fresh re-installs each time).
Its documented at:
http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/markir/freebsd/
I wanted to play with
Hej jonguk,
Jonguk Kim wrote:
Marian Hettwer wrote:
from /etc/X11/xorg.conf
Section "InputDevice"
Identifier "Mouse0"
Driver "mouse"
Option "Protocol" "auto"
Option "Device" "/dev/sysmouse"
I think 'Option "Buttons" "5"' can help you.
nope,
On Thu, 2005-Jul-21 17:46:13 +0200, Martin wrote:
>One more thing about "cheap hardware": if you know that a piece of
>hardware is potentially buggy (I mean real BUGS and not missing
>support), please publish your opinion, because I will buy hardware
>FOR FREEBSD, so I avoid major problems. How abo
To send mail to me, you need to add [laundry] to the end of the
subject line (eg: Subject: Random message [laundry]).
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[E
At 2005-07-21 19:20:34+, "Eli K. Breen" writes:
> All,
>
> Does anyone have a good handle on how to replicate (read: image) a
> freebsd machine from one machine to an ostensibly similar machine?
>
> So far I've used countless variations and combinations of the following:
>
> dd(
Danny Howard([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on 2005.07.21 15:10:54 +:
> machine-specific customization. Then PUBLISH your work before you get
> laid off. (That is how my last efforts were concluded.)
Oh, yeah :-)
http://www.mathematik.uni-marburg.de/sys/os/freebsd/
the page is in german, sorry...
Be
> Just as a point of note, I'm not trying to roll out squeeky-clean new
> machines. Let's say I've got ten-fifteen sets of clusters, I need to be
> able to just rip a copy and blast it to another machine.
>
> Thanks for all the responses so far.
you should invest some time to set up a diskless/
Steve wrote:
If anyone has that link handy, please post. (for the patch)
http://people.freebsd.org/~sos/ATA/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAI
Hi List,
Is possible resize UFS2? For example. I have 5 disks with RAID5, and
reconstruct to 6 disks with RAID5, after that FreeBSD mount RAID
perfectly, but with the same space before reconstruct RAID5. Exists one
method to FreeBSD recognize more space?
Hardware is:
Dell PV220S + PERC4/DC (
Karl Denninger wrote:
As I pointed out in my PR, "make -j4 buildworld" is more than sufficient
to demonstrate the problem.
( ... )
I'll pull over 6.0-BETA1, rebuild the array (that is the time-consuming
part of this test - takes 6-8 hours for the rebuild to run) and see if it
fails during a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey everyone,
I hope this goes through. For some reason I get bounces saying it
can't reverse my IP, though I see no problems.
I'm having major issues getting FreeBSD to install on a server. It's
been a couple weeks now and nothing I've tried has hel
Just to clarify the ATA code that is in FreeBSD 5.x is ATA-ng, the
ATA code that is in FreeBSD 6.x+ is the ATA mkIII code.
ATA-ng Preview1
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/htdig/freebsd-current/2003-August/008351.html
ATA-ng Preview2
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/htdig/freebsd-current/
середа 20 липень 2005 01:34, John-Mark Gurney Ви написали:
> > This is a single-CPU Opteron running:
> >
> > FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Fri Jun 10 09:11:30 EDT 2005 amd64
> >
> > The box has 2Gb of RAM, but NO SWAP.
> run ps lax a few times, and notice which process is fork bombing your
> box by
What could cause dhclient sometimes to fail renew the lease? I updated
world and moved to pf from ipfw same time so i don't know which to blame.
This happens from twice a day to every few days.
Jul 21 03:44:55 myserver dhclient: send_packet: No buffer space available
Jul 21 03:44:55 myserver dh
March-June 2005 Status Report
Introduction
The second quarter of 2005 has again been very exciting. The BSDCan
and MeetBSD conferences were both very interesting and and the sources
of very good times. I highly recommend attending them again next year.
It is definitely NOT fixed in 6.0-BETA1
Within SECONDS of starting a buildworld after the provider rebuild
completed, I got this...
GEOM_MIRROR: Device boot: provider ad4s1 detected.
GEOM_MIRROR: Device boot: rebuilding provider ad4s1.
GEOM_MIRROR: Device boot: provider ad6s1 detected.
GEOM_MIRRO
Am Donnerstag, 21. Juli 2005 22:06 CEST schrieb Matthias Buelow:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >My main problem, and to others after seeing the question from times to
> >times, is to know which is a good (not necessarly the best) hardware to
> >run FreeBSD on?
> >When I buy a new motherboard, which
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 02:40:09PM -0500, Karl Denninger wrote:
> It is definitely NOT fixed in 6.0-BETA1
>
> Within SECONDS of starting a buildworld after the provider rebuild
> completed, I got this...
>
> GEOM_MIRROR: Device boot: provider ad4s1 detected.
> GEOM_MIRROR: Device boot: rebuilding
SMP support in FreeBSD seems to be a perpetually favorite feature to gripe about, but every release seems to say that its getting better. I'm about to build a new server and am trying to determine if I should go with dual procs or just a single. The AMD64x2 is slightly cheaper than the FX-57 so I'm
Brandon Fosdick wrote:
SMP support in FreeBSD seems to be a perpetually favorite feature to
gripe about, but every release seems to say that its getting better. I'm
about to build a new server and am trying to determine if I should go
with dual procs or just a single. The AMD64x2 is slightly ch
Hi,
I've nuked the padding for ai_addrlen member of struct addrinfo on
RELENG_6. It broke ABI compatibility of getaddrinfo(3) on 64 bit
architecture. You have to recompile userland programs that use
getaddrinfo(3) on 64 bit architecture.
Sincerely,
--- Begin Message ---
ume 2005-07-22
On Friday 22 July 2005 04:06 pm, Brandon Fosdick wrote:
> SMP support in FreeBSD seems to be a perpetually favorite feature
> to gripe about, but every release seems to say that its getting
> better. I'm about to build a new server and am trying to determine
> if I should go with dual procs or just
Greetings all. I would appreciate any incite that you can give me with
this problem.
I am sure that you have visited this issue in the past, but I have been
unable to find a resolution. The symptoms are
ad1: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=10027551
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 02:53:57PM -0500, Karl Denninger wrote:
[...]
> Note carefully from this that there is NO ERROR INDICATION AS TO WHY THE
> DISK DETACHED!
>
> At least with the 5.x problems you'd SEE an error before it went BOOM.
>
> This time around, nope - just death.
>
> What's worse,
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 01:27:30PM -0700 I heard the voice of
Frank Mayhar, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> Sigh. You know, I've been running with two processors since 4.1 or
> thereabouts. Sure, the BGL scheme is inefficient as far as the
> kernel itself is concerned, but for compute-bound user proc
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 07:53:00PM -0700, Danny Howard wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 02:53:57PM -0500, Karl Denninger wrote:
> [...]
> > Note carefully from this that there is NO ERROR INDICATION AS TO WHY THE
> > DISK DETACHED!
> >
> > At least with the 5.x problems you'd SEE an error before i
At 04:27 PM 7/22/2005, Frank Mayhar wrote:
Brandon Fosdick wrote:
SMP support in FreeBSD seems to be a perpetually favorite feature
to gripe about, but every release seems to say that its getting
better. I'm about to build a new server and am trying to determine
if I should go with dual procs
28 matches
Mail list logo
