Phil Kernick wrote:
> .byte os_bsd-. # BSD/OS
That one could be dumped aswell, couldn't it?
mkb.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any
On 5/20/05, Doug White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please try to avoid sending your message bodies base64 encoded :) My mail
> client got really confused by it and didn't quote the message properly.
>
> Also stripping hackers cc:.
I'd like to, but Gmail doesn't offer this option. Sorry :(
> On
I did not know that this feature of FreeBSD-stable needed patched. It seems to
be working fine for me. No bugs or crabs. Thanks for the info. I will be sure
to patch my penis as soon as possible.
On Friday 20 May 2005 2:13 pm, Israel wrote:
> Penis Growth Patches are here!
> http://www.legahe.com
Jaimie Garner wrote:
> I did not know that this feature of FreeBSD-stable needed patched. It seems
> to
[...]
Godsdammit! Do you have to answer to spam that otherwise is filtered out
by a typical spamfilter? I haven't seen this until I read your reply.
mkb.
___
Sorry I couldn't resist. Is there a way to report the spam or can some add it
to a black list on the mailing list? I would volunteer for the job of
moderating spam and removing it if it is possible.
On Saturday 21 May 2005 5:59 am, Matthias Buelow wrote:
> Jaimie Garner wrote:
> > I did not know
Hello,
Trying to install 5.4 on a box that had previously run 5.3 just fine and
before that 5.2. I wanted to do a fresh install vs. an upgrade and
unfortunately this box can not boot from CD, the install is also headless. I
created the floppies, then mounted boot.flp and put a boot.config file
I have a motherboard here that reports USB controllers thusly in dmesg
(5.4-stable):
usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support
usb0: on ohci0
usb0: USB revision 1.0
uhub0: SiS OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered
ohci1: mem 0xf7002000-0xf70
Hello,
On one of my computers, the 5.4 RELEASE bootonly disc don't want to write on my
hdd.
The same hdd is ok whith other computer.
I have the same log whith 2 another hdd :
atapci0: port
0xffa0-0xffaf,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 7.1 on pci0
ata0: channel #0 on atapci0
...
# uname -a
FreeBSD robinpb.homeip.net 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Tue May 17
00:30:47 EDT 2005
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/fastipsec i386
# kgdb kernel.debug /usr/local/var/adm/crash/vmcore.44
[GDB will not be able to debug user-mode threads: /usr/lib/libthread_db.so:
Undefined
I'm trying to upgrade spamassassin, but portupgrade is stubling on every
dependant port. It appears it wants to re-install each port, which of
course doesn't work. It generates the make deinstall first error
message. portupgrade -m -DFORCE_PKG_REGISTER seems to have gotten around
the problem, but I
On 21/05/2005, at 0:52, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Fri, 2005-May-20 14:53:09 -0600, Elliot Finley wrote:
From: "Peter Jeremy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, 2005-May-20 08:25:58 -0600, Elliot Finley wrote:
I took the -L option off of my dump command in my daily dump
script. I've
gone two days
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
I'm trying to upgrade spamassassin, but portupgrade is stubling on every
dependant port. It appears it wants to re-install each port, which of
course doesn't work. It generates the make deinstall first error
message. portupgrade -m -DFORCE_PKG_REGISTER seems to have gotten aro
Hello,
try and switch the mode to PIO. You can use atacontrol when the
system is running. Try and set the PIO in the BIOS to boot without DMA.
Cheers,
Vladimir
On Sat, 21 May 2005, Remi Degruson wrote:
Hello,
On one of my computers, the 5.4 RELEASE bootonly disc don't want to write on my
h
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 02:47:28PM -0500, Barry Pederson wrote:
> Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> >I'm trying to upgrade spamassassin, but portupgrade is stubling on every
> >dependant port. It appears it wants to re-install each port, which of
> >course doesn't work. It generates the make deinstall first er
Hello there,
there is a strange thing FreeBSD 5.3 randomly frogets some of my
users. Sometimes I see in the first column of the ps aux output the uid
number instead of the login name, but next when I run it, there is the
login name. Besides, I tried to chown a directory to an existing user
On Sat, 21 May 2005 15:49:03 -0500
"Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 02:47:28PM -0500, Barry Pederson wrote:
> > Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> > >I'm trying to upgrade spamassassin, but portupgrade is stubling on every
> > >dependant port. It appears it wants to re-instal
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 02:47:28PM -0500, Barry Pederson wrote:
>>
Did you perhaps upgrade your Perl earlier? so that perhaps the existing
installed dependant ports are Perl packages for 5.6.1, but you now have
5.6.2 and portupgrade thinks your dependant packages should be
On 21/05/2005, at 1:10, Joe Rhett wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 08:21:13AM +0200, Søren Schmidt wrote:
On 19/05/2005, at 2.20, Joe Rhett wrote:
Soren, I've just retested all of this with 5.4-REL and most of the
problems
listed here are solved. The only problems appear to be related to
t
I have a setup where I mirror disk using a remote ggate disk and a
local disk. If the system is entirel quiescent, the rebuild will
occur flawlessly, but if the system is in use, I often get the
following during a rebuild (on the ggate client):
GEOM_MIRROR: Request failed (error=5). ggate2[WRITE(
* Søren Schmidt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> No, my only advise is to use the ATA mkIII patches or better yet -
> current..
In a similar vein, I'm seeing the same WRITE_DMA timeouts and system
lockups using ATA mkIII patches as I did using the standard RELENG_5
driver, on two seperate systems.
I
On 22/05/2005, at 2:36, Thomas Hurst wrote:
* Søren Schmidt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
No, my only advise is to use the ATA mkIII patches or better yet -
current..
In a similar vein, I'm seeing the same WRITE_DMA timeouts and system
lockups using ATA mkIII patches as I did using the stand
Hello,
I tried to rebuild a debug kernel to analyze one of my problem(*),
and, I faced to another problem. Now this is the main problem for me.
The problem I have now is that 'make buildkernel' does not refer to
${MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX} set in /etc/make.conf. The reason I will use
MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX is
On Sat, 21 May 2005 23:34, Ivan Voras wrote:
> When I plug my digital camera in, I get this report:
>
> umass0: HEWLETT-PACKARD HP PhotoSmart R607, rev 2.00/0.01, addr 2
> da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0
> da0: Removable Direct Access SCSI-0 device
> da0: 1.000MB/s transfers
> da0: 24MB (5
Mipam wrote this message on Wed, May 11, 2005 at 16:39 +0200:
> Perhaps lame to ask,
> But are the em and bge driver MPSAFE?
> I couldn't find notes about being mpsafe in the man pages of these
> drivers?
I was about to point you to:
http://www.freebsd.org/projects/busdma/
But realized that you
24 matches
Mail list logo
