In the last episode (Mar 31), Ronald Klop said:
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 01:04:10 -0600, Dan Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >In the last episode (Mar 31), Ronald Klop said:
> >>The syscons manual page says:
> >>"The following options will remove some features from the syscons
> >> dri
On Wednesday 30 March 2005 09:49 pm, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 22:27:43 -0700, Scott Long wrote:
> > Jon Noack wrote:
> >> On 03/30/05 23:14, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 21:28:36 -0700, Scott Long wrote:
> Greg 'groggy' Lehe
On Thu, 2005-Mar-31 09:53:59 +0200, Ronald Klop wrote:
>>In the last episode (Mar 31), Ronald Klop said:
>>>The syscons manual page says:
>>>"The following options will remove some features from the syscons
>>> driver and save kernel memory.
>>> [...]
>>> SC_NO_SYSMOUSE
>>>
Hello!
FreeBSD 5.4-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 21 12:07:18 MSK 2005
(512Mb) works well:
> umass0: USB Flash Disk, rev 2.00/2.00, addr 2
> da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0
> da0: Removable Direct Access SCSI-2 device
> da0: 1.000MB/s transfers
> da0: 500MB (1024000 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S
Mikhail Godovitcin wrote:
Hello!
FreeBSD 5.4-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 21 12:07:18 MSK 2005
(512Mb) works well:
umass0: USB Flash Disk, rev 2.00/2.00, addr 2
da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0
da0: Removable Direct Access SCSI-2 device
da0: 1.000MB/s transfers
da0: 500MB (1024000 512 byte s
Mikhail Godovitcin wrote:
I believe I should be able to help you. I've got smaller JetFlash which
works. Yours might need a quirk entry in umass.c.
Can you send us the output of 'usbdevs -v'?
> Hello!
>
> FreeBSD 5.4-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 21 12:07:18 MSK 2005
>
>(512Mb) works well:
> >
Hello!
Thursday, March 31, 2005, 16:48, you wrote:
> I believe I should be able to help you. I've got smaller JetFlash which
> works. Yours might need a quirk entry in umass.c.
> Can you send us the output of 'usbdevs -v'?
Yes, sure. Here it is.
> # usbdevs -v
> Controller /dev/usb0:
> addr 1: f
On Mar 31, 2005, at 1:00 AM, Jon Noack wrote:
My limited research (as in, Google) shows that the MADT was defined as
part of ACPI 2.0:
http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/platform/64bit/IA64_ACPI.mspx
According to your previous link the motherboard specs, it supports
both ACPI 1.0A and 2.0. Pe
On Mar 30, 2005, at 11:08 PM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 23:01:03 -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
On Mar 30, 2005, at 8:54 PM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
lapic0: LINT1 trigger: edge
lapic0: LINT1 polarity: high
lapic1: Routing NMI -> LINT1
lapic1: LINT1 trigger: edge
lapic
On Mar 31, 2005, at 12:49 AM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
This may be the case, but between man page and output some terminology
must have changed. I can't see any reference to anything like an MADT
there. Does that mean that there isn't one, or that ACPI can't find
it, or does the section APIC re
On Mar 31, 2005, at 12:27 AM, Scott Long wrote:
Jon Noack wrote:
On 03/30/05 23:14, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 21:28:36 -0700, Scott Long wrote:
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 23:01:03 -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
On Mar 30, 2005, at 8:54 PM,
"Martin Jakob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I searched a way to activate new interface/network settings after changes to
> /etc/rc.conf (defaultrouter, interface aliases, etc.). I found the
> /etc/netstart script, which does what i want. In the script i found a
> comment, which says, that this scr
--- Doug White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> AFAIK the RZ1000 bug was that it would corrupt data
> to the slave channel if the primary channel was
> also active. If you only have one device then
> you may not be able to reproduce it.
I have two harddisks on ata0:
ad0: 520MB
[1057/16/63
On Thursday 31 March 2005 04:38, Marko Äuk wrote:
> Max, that solution works fine. I have tried it and it works fine for me.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Anyway, do you know some issues with dropping traffic on em0 vlan
> enabled interfaces and tcpdump-ing ? The average traffic, that we
> tcpdump is cca 10-20m
Thank you very much. My server's uptime last two days by refer to
Klein's configuration, it's impactful, thanks to Klein.
My concern of stablility is focus on mysql's build options as
BUILD_STATIC & BUILD_OPTIMIZED, but it looks like ridiculous
without any logicality, build_static should have no
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 23:30 -0600, Karl Denninger wrote:
> BTW its NOT your hardware at fault here - the same hardware that returns
> these complaints for me on 5.x works perfectly with 4.11. There have been
> changes made to the ATA code that apparently interact VERY badly with
> some control
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 04:41:55PM +0400, Michael Lednev wrote:
> hello
>
> i'm trying to build my own release cd for 4-STABLE branch. doing make
> release BUILDNAME=4-STABLE-20050328-0300 CHROOTDIR=/usr/release
> CVSROOT=/home/ncvs RELEASETAG=RELENG_4 -DSEPARATE_LIVEFS in
> /usr/src/release
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Karl Denninger wrote:
Removing the FIRST delta, which is:
218a219,221
if (!dumping)
callout_reset(&request->callout, request->timeout * hz,
(timeout_t*)ata_timeout, request);
appears to get rid of the crashes while not harming data integr
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 12:02:20PM -0500, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Karl Denninger wrote:
> > Removing the FIRST delta, which is:
> >
> > 218a219,221
> > if (!dumping)
> > callout_reset(&request->callout, request->timeout * hz,
> > (timeou
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Karl Denninger wrote:
What do you expect the patch to do, given that removing the delta
appears to fix the instability problem?
I expect the patch to properly stop the callout.
--
10 40 80 C0 00 FF FF FF FF C0 00 00 00 00 10 AA AA 03 00 00 00 08 00
I am still running 5.3-RELEASE-p5 and there is
/*$FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/em/if_em.c,v 1.44.2.2 2004/10/15 22:12:59
tackerman Exp $*/
, obviously unpatched and bad driver. I'll try to cvsup to 5.4-PRE, but
I'm a little worried with stability, as this is my main firewall for
whole network.
2nd thi
Dear colleagues,
are there any issues with amd64 and ipnat? Trying to set up new multi-vlan
router in our ISP network I've found very strange issues: machine hangs cold,
no console (only comconsole is available) messages or reaction, more than one
time, right after activating the first VLAN wit
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 12:19:13PM -0500, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Karl Denninger wrote:
> > What do you expect the patch to do, given that removing the delta
> > appears to fix the instability problem?
>
> I expect the patch to properly stop the callout.
Ok, so the implicat
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Rob wrote:
>
> --- Doug White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > AFAIK the RZ1000 bug was that it would corrupt data
> > to the slave channel if the primary channel was
> > also active. If you only have one device then
> > you may not be able to reproduce it.
>
> I have two h
On Thursday 31 March 2005 19:29, Marko Äuk wrote:
> I am still running 5.3-RELEASE-p5 and there is
>
> /*$FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/em/if_em.c,v 1.44.2.2 2004/10/15 22:12:59
> tackerman Exp $*/
>
> , obviously unpatched and bad driver. I'll try to cvsup to 5.4-PRE, but
> I'm a little worried with stabil
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 03:25:37PM -0800, Peter Wemm wrote:
> Greg: The busdma problems from 5.3-RELEASE are fixed. That doesn't
> mean that there are no *other* problems. Scott is saying "the old
> busdma bug shouldn't be affecting 5.4-PRE", and he's correct.
>
> Most likely, something else
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 08:14:45AM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> > I had 4 bad out of 12 tested where the DIMMs were Crucial PC2700 2GB
> > Reg. ECC DIMMs.
>
> OK, this makes sense. It might also explain why the 4 GB
> configuration only recognizes 3.5 GB.
No. This is due to the 3.5-4.0GB
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 10:32:33AM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 08:14, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> > > Have you run sysutils/memtest86 with the 8 GB?
> >
> > Heh. Difficult when the system doesn't run.
>
> You could try http://www.memtest86.com although that doesn't do >4G
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 11:24:29AM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> On Thursday, 31 March 2005 at 10:32:33 +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> > On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 08:14, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> >>> Have you run sysutils/memtest86 with the 8 GB?
> >>
> >> Heh. Difficult when the system doesn'
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: Uwe Doering [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ...
> > >
> > > Did you merge 1.3.2.3 as well? This actually should have
> > been one MFC
>
> Yes, merged from RELENG_4.
>
> I will post later if this happens again, but it will be quite
> a long time. The machine has 7 dri
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Karl Denninger wrote:
Would you prefer me to validate that path before or after I attempt to
validate that removing the first delta fixes the crashes on my
production machine? (Reason for the question is that the latter will
require most of the rest of the day and evening,
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 02:16:11PM -0500, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Karl Denninger wrote:
> > Would you prefer me to validate that path before or after I attempt to
> > validate that removing the first delta fixes the crashes on my
> > production machine? (Reason for the ques
Mikhail Godovitcin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Thursday, March 31, 2005, 16:48, you wrote:
> > I believe I should be able to help you. I've got smaller JetFlash which
> > works. Yours might need a quirk entry in umass.c.
> > Can you send us the output of 'usbdevs -v'?
>
> Yes, sure. Here it is.
>
> > #
> Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 16:12:35 +0900
> From: Ganbold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Problems with AMD64 and 8 GB RAM?
>
> Hi,
>
> Since we are discussing AMD64 with 8GB RAM, I also would like to point my
> problem.
>
> I'm still looking for possibility to run FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE with more
Don Bowman wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Uwe Doering [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ...
Did you merge 1.3.2.3 as well? This actually should have
been one MFC
Yes, merged from RELENG_4.
I will post later if this happens again, but it will be quite
a long time. The machine has 7 drives in it, t
On Mar 31, 2005, at 3:08 PM, Alan Jay wrote:
We did some tests with the latest 5.3-STABLE / 5.4-PRERELEASE and
still found
the same issues when using a mySQL database heavily hit over the
Ethernet
controller. Our final tests limited the memory on boot-up to 4Gb and
the bug
is still there so we
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 09:02:16 +0400, Igor Pokrovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
This is not an officially supported way of building releases.
That's why there is some magic to finish this procedure.
Even if it will complete successfully it won't neccessary mean it will
work
correctly. You'd bett
From: Uwe Doering [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Don Bowman wrote:
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >>From: Uwe Doering [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ...
> >>
> Did you merge 1.3.2.3 as well? This actually should have
> >>>
> >>>been one MFC
> >>
> >>Yes, merged from RELENG_4.
> >>
> >>I will pos
Don Bowman wrote:
From: Uwe Doering [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Don Bowman wrote:
[...]
Another drive failed and the same thing happened.
After the failure, the raid worked in degrade mode just
fine, but many
files had been corrupted during the failure.
So I would suggest that this merge did not
--- Doug White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Rob wrote:
>
>> No, not at the moment. I may try 5.3 (or probably
>> 5.4) later once again. What part of the output
>> would be particularly interesting?
>> I ask, because I am managing this PC at the other
>> end of the world, givin
Tom Alsberg wrote:
> Perhaps this should go to -STABLE, I just couldn't be sure.
It will get more attention on freebsd-stable@, so I'm CCing that list.
> We are trying out FreeBSD 5.4-PRERELEASE on diskless clients. I
> noticed one problem, being that when setting the LD_LIBRARY_PATH
> (or for t
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Rob wrote:
>
> --- Doug White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Rob wrote:
> >
> >> No, not at the moment. I may try 5.3 (or probably
> >> 5.4) later once again. What part of the output
> >> would be particularly interesting?
> >> I ask, because I am managing
>On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 11:58:02AM -0500, Paul Mather wrote:
>>On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 15:21 +0300, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
>>> Dear colleagues,
>>>
>>> dumping the snapshot of 140G ufs2 fyle system under contemporary
>>> RELENG_5 I found that during mksnap_ffs file system is
unresponsible >>> eve
Hi, Michael Lednev,
Tuesday, March 29, 2005, 4:41:55 PM:
ML> what to change in my make command or in system to build release? host
ML> system is 5.3-STABLE
You can try the following:
1. Change /etc/make.conf
OSVERSION=491102 # st this to kern.osreldate value in RELENG_4
OSREL=4.11
2. make
44 matches
Mail list logo
