Zahemszky Gábor wrote:
The subject said it: I've got a brand new ATAPI DVD-RW. In my kernel,
there is ATAPICAM. I can see it with camcontrol, but, cannot see it in
cdrecord -scanbus.
I can write to it with growisofs as /dev/cd1, but cannot write it with
cdrecord/cdrdao, and cannot reach i
Android Andrew wrote:
Hello!
I have a problem with Intel(R) PRO/1000 card (Intel 82540) - it does
not initialize properly during boot process.
I've got these error messages in /var/log/messages:
...
Dec 16 19:27:36 zahrouer kernel: pci2: on pcib2
Dec 16 19:27:36 zahrouer kernel: em0: port 0xb0
Hello,
I've been using 4.X branch for production servers. Yesterday I bought
box in datacenter with RAID 1 controller and operators in DC set up FreeBSD
5.X for me (instead 4.X i asked) because they have troubles with set
up RAID controller runing on 4.X.
I have two options:
Posting wi
Hi all,
After some very late evenings trying to figure out why vinum failed
after an upgrade from 5.2.1 to 5.3 i scouted the following document:
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.3R/errata.html
This is the interesting part for this issue:
(31 Oct 2004, updated on 12 Nov 2004) The vinum(4) subsyst
Hi all,
Forget the first post. My server is still somewhat unstable after the
upgrade attempts, and I appologize. Here goes the real deal:
I tried to upgrade my existing 5.2.1 to a 5.3. I ran into severe
problems with my vinum setup in trying to do so. I think i can answer
why, the reason is st
Am Samstag, 18. Dezember 2004 20:52 schrieb Nikolaj Hansen:
> [...]
> I think I have to disagree calling muliple drives on a disk
> "uncommon". In fact, I think I remember that being the way it was
> demonstrated in an old version of the handbook. Here is my current
> setup after rolling back to Fr
In my experience 5.3 is quite good for production and you should not be afraid
to use it instead of 4.X
I have been running a few 5.3 boxes in production for a while without problems
and im planning to replace
the rest of my servers with 5.3
--
Ísak Ben,
http://www.isak.is
-- Original
On Sat, 2004-12-18 at 20:52 +0100, Nikolaj Hansen wrote:
> While some uncommon configurations, such as multiple vinum drives on a
> disk, are not supported, it is generally backward compatible. Note that
> for the geom(4)-aware vinum, its new userland control program, gvinum,
> should be used,
I have been running apache, postfix, postgresql on a 5.3 mashine and the
only problems i have faced was with sshd and time outs and even then most of
the problem was with my named.conf. 5.3 seems to be doing great! much better
than the ones before it, and i am on a dual amd system. The only down ti
Am Samstag, 18. Dezember 2004 23:35 schrieb Paul Mather:
>
> The biggest problem you'll have is if your system suffers the ATA
> "TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA" woe that bedevils some of us under 5.3. When
> that happens, your mirror will be knocked into a degraded state (half
> of your mirrored plexes will
Announcement
The FreeBSD Release Engineering Team is pleased to announce the availability
of FreeBSD 4.11-RC1, which marks the beginning of the FreeBSD 4.11 Release
Cycle. This will be the last of the FreeBSD 4.X releases. It is meant
to give users a little more time to migrate to
On Sun, 2004-12-19 at 00:15 +0100, Matthias Schuendehuette wrote:
> Am Samstag, 18. Dezember 2004 23:35 schrieb Paul Mather:
> >
> > The biggest problem you'll have is if your system suffers the ATA
> > "TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA" woe that bedevils some of us under 5.3. When
> > that happens, your mirro
The apache.org mail server has been happier since we updated to a point on
RELENG_5 after the recent fixes for if_em. We still need to apply the
patch floating around for mpt, as without it performance on a RAID 1 set
of disks is reported by bonnie at 1 MB/s, with the patch it's 50 MB/s.
Other
I see that there is no scheduled release date for FreeBSD 5.4
(which is not a surprise; 5.3 was finalized so recently).
However, there seem to be glitches and performance issues
which I need to see resolved before I can move to 5.3.x (rather
than 4.10 or 4.11) for production servers.
Would anyone
Here is a panic on a 5-STABLE system.
I was testing out a system (Dell PII 400MHz) my father retired. I
thought heard some activity on the drive, so I ssh'd over to it then
exited right away (time to leave for a movie :)). It panicked shortly
afterward.
Although it is on a different bus and proba
On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 10:00:57PM -0700, Brett Glass wrote:
> I see that there is no scheduled release date for FreeBSD 5.4
> (which is not a surprise; 5.3 was finalized so recently).
> However, there seem to be glitches and performance issues
> which I need to see resolved before I can move to 5.
On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 10:00:57PM -0700, Brett Glass wrote:
> I see that there is no scheduled release date for FreeBSD 5.4
> (which is not a surprise; 5.3 was finalized so recently).
> However, there seem to be glitches and performance issues
> which I need to see resolved before I can move to 5.
On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 07:27:58PM -0500, Paul Mather wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-12-19 at 00:15 +0100, Matthias Schuendehuette wrote:
> > Am Samstag, 18. Dezember 2004 23:35 schrieb Paul Mather:
> > >
> > > The biggest problem you'll have is if your system suffers the ATA
> > > "TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA" woe
18 matches
Mail list logo
