On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 12:34:25AM +0900, Hideki Yamamoto wrote:
H> I have found a problem about PPPoE parameter in /etc/rc.network.
H> When setting the following lines in /etc/rc.conf, pppoe server does not
H> work well. The string "service-pppoe" is an entry in
H> /etc/ppp/ppp.conf for PPPoE se
On Thursday 18 November 2004 15:20, Jon Noack wrote:
> Did you recompile all your ports recently (portupgrade -af)? You should
> certainly do this after upgrading from 4-stable and there was ABI breakage
> right before 5.3 that required a recompile to use the new libraries. You
> could try setti
> On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 03:55:11PM +, Brian Candler wrote:
> > I started with a fresh 5.3-RELEASE install and then upgraded the kernel
> > source to 5.3-STABLE
>
> Sorry, I meant to say 5-STABLE. The release tag is RELENG_5 (I just used
> /usr/share/examples/cvsup/stable-supfile)
Well, the
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004, Sean McNeil wrote:
> I have to disagree. Packet loss is likely according to some of my
> tests. With the re driver, no change except placing a 100BT setup with
> no packet loss to a gigE setup (both linksys switches) will cause
> serious packet loss at 20Mbps data rates. I
I did FastEthernet throughput test by Smartbits with SmartApp.
It's simpler than TCP throughput measurement. :)
This Smartbits has some FastEthernet ports, has no GbE ports.
The router is consist of single Xeon 2.4GHz which is HTT enabled and
two on-boarded em interfaces. The kernel is 5.3-RE
DONALD GOODWIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The drive is seen by the OS. I can mount it using a normal CD-R. But when
> I try to use it for a burner, it doesn't work (get a bad ioctl message).
The _exact_ wording of the error message might be helpful.
> When I run camcontrol devlist, the dri
Hi Uwe,
hi comitters.
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 10:08:18PM +0100, Uwe Doering wrote:
> I've attached an updated version of the patch for 'vnode_pager.c'. On
> my test system it resolved the issue. Please let us know whether it
> works for you as well.
Is there any known way to trigger the probl
Hi All
Very new to FreeBSD and google has not proved helpful for once. Running
4.10Stable and I would like to allow traffic on port 20 on my server and I
assumed /etc/rc.firewall was the place to do so. I added a line in the file
in the same format as the rule allowing port 21 traffic but was not
Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 10:08:18PM +0100, Uwe Doering wrote:
I've attached an updated version of the patch for 'vnode_pager.c'. On
my test system it resolved the issue. Please let us know whether it
works for you as well.
Is there any known way to trigger the problem?
The SIIG card I have does use shared interrupt for both ports, so I don't see
any other way around it.
The 0x4001 is a regular flag that's used by sio.c . I found an undocumented
feature in there, that allows you to set a FIFO size, so I used it in
combination with the shared irq flag.
from
:: Can anyone point me to a clear resource on what I should do to start, stop
:: and flush the port filter rules and whether or not I was working in the
:: correct place to begin with.
Always start with the Handbook:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/firewalls.html
Then, t
Paul Sandys wrote this message on Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 11:46 -0500:
> The SIIG card I have does use shared interrupt for both ports, so I don't see
> any other way around it.
>
> The 0x4001 is a regular flag that's used by sio.c . I found an
> undocumented
> feature in there, that allows you
On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 11:34 +, Robert Watson wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Nov 2004, Sean McNeil wrote:
>
> > I have to disagree. Packet loss is likely according to some of my
> > tests. With the re driver, no change except placing a 100BT setup with
> > no packet loss to a gigE setup (both linksys sw
Hi,
I am trying to do buildkernel with my own configuration file
(MYKERNEL_CONFIG). I am getting the following error. I am not sure what
is wrong. Any help will be appreciated .
# uname -sr
FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE-p11
#make buildkernel KERNCONF=MYKERNEL_CONFIG
---
Tejas Kokje wrote:
Hi,
Hello,
I am trying to do buildkernel with my own configuration file
(MYKERNEL_CONFIG). I am getting the following error. I am not sure what
is wrong. Any help will be appreciated .
#make buildkernel KERNCONF=MYKERNEL_CONFIG
> [...]
Warning: device "cz" is unknown
Tejas Kokje wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to do buildkernel with my own configuration file
(MYKERNEL_CONFIG). I am getting the following error. I am not sure
what is wrong. Any help will be appreciated .
# uname -sr
FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE-p11
#make buildkernel KERNCONF=MYKERNEL_CONFIG
Sean McNeil wrote this message on Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 12:14 -0800:
> On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 11:34 +, Robert Watson wrote:
> > On Sun, 21 Nov 2004, Sean McNeil wrote:
> >
> > > I have to disagree. Packet loss is likely according to some of my
> > > tests. With the re driver, no change except
Hi John-Mark,
On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 13:31 -0800, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> Sean McNeil wrote this message on Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 12:14 -0800:
> > On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 11:34 +, Robert Watson wrote:
> > > On Sun, 21 Nov 2004, Sean McNeil wrote:
> > >
> > > > I have to disagree. Packet loss i
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 03:32:13PM -0500, David Gilbert wrote:
> > "Julian" == Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Julian> David Gilbert wrote:
>
> >> I've got a medium busy server (few thousand mail messages a day,
> >> web, webmail, imap, etc) that I can fairly reliably reproduc
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 04:03:50PM +0200, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote:
>
> In 5.3-RELEASE ERRATA I see the following:
>
>(1 Nov 2004) ATA RAID support for the CMD649 and SiI0680 ATA
>controllers is non-functional in this release. When such a controller
>is brough up under ata(4) (atar
:Increasing the interrupt moderation frequency worked on the re driver,
:but it only made it marginally better. Even without moderation,
:however, I could lose packets without m_defrag. I suspect that there is
:something in the higher level layers that is causing the packet loss. I
:have no expl
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gregory Bond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Rob wrote:
:
: >>> You'd better cite your source and / or reasoning, as ~3*10^8m/s =is=
: >>> the
: >>> accepted constant speed of light in vacuum.
: >>
: It's deeper than that. The "second" and the "meter" ar
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
John-Mark Gurney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Paul Sandys wrote this message on Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 11:46 -0500:
: > The SIIG card I have does use shared interrupt for both ports, so I don't
see
: > any other way around it.
: >
: > The 0x4001 is a
I'm getting the following panic on boot when I've got the
BKTR_NEW_MSP34XX_DRIVER option enabled for bktr.
Running 5-STABLE.
panic: sleeping without a mutex
KDB: enter: panic
[thread 100012]
Stopped at kbd_enter+0x2c: leave
db> tr
kbd_enter(c0635ca1,100,c1b6c54c,c1b41320,0) at kbd_enter+0x2c
pani
> "Brian" == Brian Fundakowski Feldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Brian> Long strings of NUL bytes? Missing data? Spam (from the same
Brian> file, or from other files)?
Well... I don't really know db file formats. Most of the corruption I
found in berkley db files. mailgraph uses rrd. m
In the last episode (Nov 22), David Gilbert said:
> > "Brian" == Brian Fundakowski Feldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Brian> Long strings of NUL bytes? Missing data? Spam (from the same
> Brian> file, or from other files)?
>
> Well... I don't really know db file formats. Most of the corr
Hi,
I have tested following with FreeBSD 5.3-Stable.
On several different PCs I have used
make -j$n buildworld
with $n ranging from 1 to 9.
Although people suggest "-j4" as optimal in general
case, I have come to a very different conclusion:
1) single CPU with enough RAM (2 GHz, 512 MB)
there
What was happening at the beginning, it was mangling data coming into the
computer and 'cu -l /dev/cuaa5' was taking up 100% CPU in interrupt. It was only
showing first 31 characters of input, then it froze until I hit Enter couple
times and such. My original idea was "this thing claims to have 64
This thread needs to die.
The speed of light has nothing to do with this mailing list, period.
Let this be the last post to it.
Thank you!
Cheers,
Brian Szymanski
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Gregory Bond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : Rob wrote:
> :
> : >
> With these simple tests, I come to the conclusion that
> "make -j$n buildworld" is best with n = number of CPUs.
> Does that make sense?
Yes, I believe this makes sense. The recommendations made in the handbook
(n >= 4) date back from the time when IO was the bottleneck in the
compilation proce
30 matches
Mail list logo
