Hi all!
We have a production system that runs on a vinum system drive
configured like this:
cab# vinum l
2 drives:
D b State: up /dev/ad1s1h A: 0/114494 MB (0%)
D a State: up /dev/ad0s1h A: 0/114494 MB (0%)
4 volumes:
V root
Hi!
Next test with the current beta:
We have a system with a VIA chipset based mainboard, the ATA
controller is reported to be a VIA 8235.
This system has worked just fine with 5.1 then stopped working when
the atang changes were commited. It wasn't that important to us
(it's really cheap [tm] ha
The opportunity presented itelf for me to test packet passing ability
on some fairly exotic hardware. The motherboard I really wanted to
test not only had separate memory busses for each cpu, but also had
two separate PCI-X busses (one slot each). To this, I added two
intel pro/1000 gigabit ether
David Gilbert wrote:
The opportunity presented itelf for me to test packet passing ability
on some fairly exotic hardware. The motherboard I really wanted to
test not only had separate memory busses for each cpu, but also had
two separate PCI-X busses (one slot each). To this, I added two
intel p
> "Scott" == Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Scott> Interesting results. One thing to note is that a severe bug in
Scott> the if_em driver was fixed for BETA7. The symptoms of this bug
Scott> include apparent livelock of the machine during heavy xmit
Scott> load. You might want to up
David Gilbert wrote:
The opportunity presented itelf for me to test packet passing ability
on some fairly exotic hardware. The motherboard I really wanted to
test not only had separate memory busses for each cpu, but also had
two separate PCI-X busses (one slot each). To this, I added two
intel p
David Gilbert wrote:
During the next week, I will continue testing with full simulated
routing tables, random packets and packets between 350 and 550 bytes
(average ISP out/in packet sizes). I will add to this report then.
If anyone has tuning advice for FreeBSD 5.3, I'd like to hear it.
Three thi
On Fri, 2004-10-08 at 07:52, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
> We have a production system that runs on a vinum system drive
> configured like this:
[[Configuration omitted.]]
> It's currently running fine with FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p10.
>
> After upgrading to 5.3-BETA7, buildworld, buildkernel, insta
At 10:08 AM 08/10/2004, David Gilbert wrote:
Right out of the box, FreeBSD 5.3 (with polling) passed about 200
kpps. net.isr.enable=1 increased that without polling to about 220
Did you have kern.polling.idle_poll at 0 or 1 ? In my tests a few weeks ago
this seemed to make a difference, but the l
Paul Mather wrote:
> Vinum is known broken in 5.3. :-) You should be using geom_vinum
> instead. It will largely be a drop-in replacement for your above Vinum
> configuration. (I am using it on a similar root-on-vinum setup.) The
> main changes are these:
What I need to know is whether the rai
David Gilbert wrote:
> Right out of the box, FreeBSD 5.3 (with polling) passed about 200
> kpps.
Was this with debug.mpsafenet enabled and all debugging (WITNESS and such)
turned off?
/Daniel Eriksson
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.f
> "Guy" == Guy Helmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Guy> The fixed bug in the em driver for BETA7 may significantly help
Guy> (see Scott Long's response prior to mine).
As I replied, I hand-applied these patches. They reduced live lock
(or what my tech calls "chunkyness" --- almost live lock),
> "Mike" == Mike Tancsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mike> At 10:08 AM 08/10/2004, David Gilbert wrote:
>> Right out of the box, FreeBSD 5.3 (with polling) passed about 200
>> kpps. net.isr.enable=1 increased that without polling to about 220
Mike> Did you have kern.polling.idle_poll at 0 or
> "Daniel" == Daniel Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Daniel> David Gilbert wrote:
>> Right out of the box, FreeBSD 5.3 (with polling) passed about 200
>> kpps.
Daniel> Was this with debug.mpsafenet enabled and all debugging
Daniel> (WITNESS and such) turned off?
mpsafenet on and all wit
Howdy!
FreeBSD 4-10
I have some machines that run customers cgi stuff.
These machines have started to hang and become unresponsive.
At first I thought it was a hardware issue, but I discovered in
a cyclades log the following stuff that got logged to the
console which explains the
David Gilbert wrote:
"Scott" == Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Scott> Interesting results. One thing to note is that a severe bug in
Scott> the if_em driver was fixed for BETA7. The symptoms of this bug
Scott> include apparent livelock of the machine during heavy xmit
Scott>
At 12:18 PM 08/10/2004, David Gilbert wrote:
Idle_poll is default 1, I'm not positive we tested 0. I don't think
there is much idle time here.
Actually, on RELENG_5, I think the default is now zero.
With a releng_5 BETA7 box in between 2 other hosts, with idle_poll set to
the default on zero, usi
> "Julian" == Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Julian> David Gilbert wrote:
Julian> there are also changes in B4->B7 that ar related to scheduling
Julian> the packet delivery mechanisms.. They may not make much of a
Julian> difference but...
I will endevour to do cvsup and retest
> "Mike" == Mike Tancsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mike> At 12:18 PM 08/10/2004, David Gilbert wrote:
>> Idle_poll is default 1, I'm not positive we tested 0. I don't
>> think there is much idle time here.
Mike> Actually, on RELENG_5, I think the default is now zero.
checked, tho. We did
[ current@ cc'ed, as is still the best place for 5.x ]
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 14:17:13 +0200 (CEST)
"Patrick M. Hausen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Next test with the current beta:
>
> We have a system with a VIA chipset based mainboard, the ATA
> controller is reported to be a VIA 8235.
On Thu, Jan 01, 1970 at 12:00:00AM +, Steve Shorter wrote:
> Howdy!
>
> FreeBSD 4-10
>
> I have some machines that run customers cgi stuff.
> These machines have started to hang and become unresponsive.
> At first I thought it was a hardware issue, but I discovered in
> a cyclade
Jean-Francois Dockes writes:
| Just in case it may help someone (this information is not very easily
| accessible in the archives):
|
| - I have a Promise TX2 controller with a PCI ID of 0x3375105a . It works
|for me in 4.10 by adding the new PCI ID everywhere that you'll find the
|other/
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 09:49:45PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 12:38:42PM -0400, Vlad wrote:
> > FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE #3: Thu Sep 30
> >
> > $ id
> > uid=65534(nobody) gid=65534(nobody) groups=65534(nobody)
> >
> > $ mkdir test
> >
> > $ chmod 770 test
> >
> > $ cp -R
hi there, i've got my system reinstalled today with freebsd 4.9-release.
i installed cvsup-without-gui by ports, typed cvsup stable.sup, waited for that
finish, cd /usr/src and make buildworld.
and then BOOM! it drop. whats the big deal? i'm tired doing this on MANY others
servers, at home, on ot
24 matches
Mail list logo
