Re: vnode_pager_putpages hanged my machine

2004-03-09 Thread David Malone
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 04:07:45PM +0900, Rob wrote: > Did the machine end up in an eternal loop and ate up all resources? > A bug in vnode? Or in the pager? It looks like convert was killed because it ran your machine out of memory - that might explain extream slugishness if everything else had b

Re: vnode_pager_putpages hanged my machine

2004-03-09 Thread Rob
David Malone wrote: On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 04:07:45PM +0900, Rob wrote: Did the machine end up in an eternal loop and ate up all resources? A bug in vnode? Or in the pager? It looks like convert was killed because it ran your machine out of memory - that might explain extream slugishness if every

Re: vnode_pager_putpages hanged my machine

2004-03-09 Thread Eugene Grosbein
> But any regular user can bring the system virtually to a stand > still this way. Shouldn't the OS prevent this to happen? > That's why I suspect a bug somewhere allowing this to happen. A system administrator must prevent such things from happening using limits(1) or login.conf(5). FreeBSD does

Re: vnode_pager_putpages hanged my machine

2004-03-09 Thread Willie Viljoen
On Tuesday 09 March 2004 09:07, someone, possibly Rob, wrote: > After reboot, I found this in /var/log/messages, before the reboot > messages: > > [...] > Mar 9 15:27:22 cisr /kernel: vnode_pager_putpages: residual I/O 65536 at > 451 Mar 9 15:27:22 cisr /kernel: pid 7 (syncer), uid 0 on /var: fil

Re: em0 checksum errors

2004-03-09 Thread ict technician
On Friday 05 March 2004 11:54 am, ict technician wrote: > On Thursday 04 March 2004 12:08 pm, ict technician wrote: > > On Tuesday 02 March 2004 2:34 pm, ict technician wrote: > > > On Tuesday 02 March 2004 12:28 pm, ict technician wrote: > > > > I've been testing an application which uses UDP. I w

/etc/login.conf: /etc/COPYRIGHT vs. /COPYRIGHT

2004-03-09 Thread Rob
Hi, In /etc/login.conf, there is a line: :copyright=/etc/COPYRIGHT:\ but I do not have this file. However I have: /COPYRIGHT Is this a mistake in login.conf, or is my "COPYRIGHT" in the wrong place? Cheers, Rob. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] maili

init: kernel security level changed from 0 to 1

2004-03-09 Thread Jacob Tracey
i can't for the life of me understand why this box won't go into securelevel 0. i've messed with everything i could think of yet at bootime after everything i get this message: init: kernel security level changed from 0 to 1. any ideas? thanks, jacob [relevant files] police# cat /etc/sysctl.conf

Re: init: kernel security level changed from 0 to 1

2004-03-09 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 04:10:45AM +1100, Jacob Tracey wrote: > i can't for the life of me understand why this box won't go into securelevel > 0. i've messed with everything i could think of yet at bootime after > everything i get this message: init: kernel security level changed from 0 to > 1. >

sockaddr_(in|in6) compatiblity

2004-03-09 Thread Lukasz Stelmach
Greetings All. Tell me please is it normal what i get? 1. I open socket AF_INET6/SOCK_DGRAM... OK 2. bind it to :::127.0.0.1/53...OK 3. recvfrom() data from the socket... OK 4. *from (the 5th parameter to recvfrom) gets filled in like it was a sockaddr_in (ipv4) structure which means t