Oliver Fromme:
>Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 11:42:57PM +0200, Jaco van Tonder wrote:
> > > I just cvsup'ed to that latest -STABLE and saw that option HTT
> > > is no longer availible in LINT. Does anyone know why this is no
> > > longer supported? I searched
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 07:37:05AM -0500, Brian T. Schellenberger wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday 03 November 2003 07:06 pm, Erik Trulsson wrote:
> | On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 03:50:57PM -0800, Chris Pressey wrote:
> | > On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 00:17:26 +0100
> | >
> | > Erik Trulsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
> I take that back. I can reproduce it, but only in xterm (I normally
> don't use X much, so I only tried it in a normal text console.)
For what it may be worth, I can reproduce this on my freshly cvsuped
4.9-R server, as well as my 4.8-STABLE from July 1.
Also only in an xterm (untested with c
Brian T. Schellenberger wrote:
OTOH, the fact that nobody seems to have noticed until after 4.9 was released
is a pretty strong argument that not very many people care--unless of
course :-)
Ag! It was a stupid fscking idea to make
arbitrary changes to something that hadn't really chan
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 07:44:13AM -0800, David Raistrick wrote:
>
> > I take that back. I can reproduce it, but only in xterm (I normally
> > don't use X much, so I only tried it in a normal text console.)
>
> For what it may be worth, I can reproduce this on my freshly cvsuped
> 4.9-R server,
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 07:49:36AM -0800, Michael Sierchio wrote:
> Brian T. Schellenberger wrote:
>
>
> >OTOH, the fact that nobody seems to have noticed until after 4.9 was
> >released is a pretty strong argument that not very many people
> >care--unless of course :-)
>
> Ag! It wa
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Erik Trulsson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 07:49:36AM -0800, Michael Sierchio wrote:
> > Brian T. Schellenberger wrote:
> >
> >
> > >OTOH, the fact that nobody seems to have noticed until after 4.9 was
> > >released is a pretty strong argument that not very many people
Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Very critical indeed... And with such a huge userbase that it took six
> > months before anybody noticed this problem. :-)
>
> No, we noticed it here at work where we use Sun Solaris
> boxes as our development systems. I didn't know what the
> prob
Hello,
When I run portupgrade -ra and PHP needs upgrading I am faced with
having to select all the options I want PHP compiled with (again). I
hate this.
How can I continually compile PHP with the same options as the last time?
Thanks!
Rick
___
[E
On 03 Nov 2003, Rick Updegrove wrote:
> When I run portupgrade -ra and PHP needs upgrading I am faced with
> having to select all the options I want PHP compiled with (again). I
> hate this.
>
> How can I continually compile PHP with the same options as the last time?
If you haven't cv
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 08:56:57AM +, Bob Bishop wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At 00:05 4/11/03, John wrote:
> >[...]
> >btw its a dual 400
> >[etc]
>
> Just for clarification: it seems from the data you posted that you aren't
> running an SMP kernel, right? If CPU is your problem, that might make a
> d
hi,
mkdir /usr/share/locale/zh_CN.GBK/
will help
regards Stfean
Gregory Sutter wrote:
Murray,
Your commits earlier this evening to zh_CN.GB18030 fixed that -STABLE
breakage, but zh_CN.GBK appears still to be missing, which causes
'make installworld' to fail. Can you please fix this as well?
Hi.
> How can I continually compile PHP with the same
> options as the last time?
>
Edit /usr/ports/lang/php4/Makefile and change the line
PHP4_OPTIONS?= according to your needs.
regards
Claus
Yahoo! Mail (http://dk.mail.yahoo.com) - Gratis: 6 MB lagerplads, spamfilter og
virusscan
:: > How can I continually compile PHP with the same
:: > options as the last time?
::
:: Edit /usr/ports/lang/php4/Makefile and change the line
:: PHP4_OPTIONS?= according to your needs.
Except that the next time you upgrade your ports tree, your changes will
be overwritten. Check out the /usr
It seems Anshuman Kanwar wrote:
Ehem, this machine is NOT ServerWorks based, its Intel...
> rack2-102.nyc# pciconf -l
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:0: class=0x06 card=0x chip=0x254c8086 rev=0x01
> hdr=0x00
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:2:0: class=0x060400 card=0x chip=0x25438086 rev=0x01
> hdr=
15 matches
Mail list logo
