John Bdckstrand wrote:
>
> Ive been googling quite a bit now for problems with
> running out of mbuf
> clusters. Im basically sending a 30k datachunk down
> 1000-4000 connections,
> but 1000 is more than enough to quickly fill upp 8192
> mbuf clusters. I also
> tried setting maximum amount of mbuf
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 03:03:20AM +0200, John
B?ckstrand wrote:
> > Ive been googling quite a bit now for problems with
> > running out of mbuf
> > clusters. Im basically sending a 30k datachunk down
> > 1000-4000 connections,
> > but 1000 is more than enough to quickly fill upp
8192
> > mbuf cl
> > >From this it sounds as it is a problem that should
be
> > fixed, but it
> > obviously isnt in 4.8. Is this behaviour now
considered
> > acceptable? And if
> > so, doesnt this make FreeBSD extremely easy to kill
> > using a simple
> > DOS-attack? Is this "fixed" in any way on 5.1?
>
> Yup, that
Machine is 4.8-STABLE
smaug# camcontrol devlist
at scbus0 target 0 lun 0 (pass0,da0)
at scbus0 target 1 lun 0 (pass1,da1)
at scbus0 target 2 lun 0 (pass2,da2)
at scbus0 target 3 lun 0 (pass3,da3)
at scbus0 target 5 lun 0 (pass4,da4)
smaug# ls -l
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 15:59:33 +0100, Pete French wrote:
> Machine is 4.8-STABLE
>
> smaug# camcontrol devlist
>at scbus0 target 0 lun 0 (pass0,da0)
>at scbus0 target 1 lun 0 (pass1,da1)
>at scbus0 target 2 lun 0 (pass2,da2)
>at scbus0 target 3 lun
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Geoffrey T. Falk wrote:
GTF> I am cleaning up my 4-STABLE system. After a fresh installworld, I am
GTF> looking at files that did not get touched by the install. Is it safe to
GTF> remove all such files?
GTF>
GTF> In particular, I am looking at /usr/libexec/lib-elf.so.1, which
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 08:03:33PM +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Geoffrey T. Falk wrote:
>
> GTF> I am cleaning up my 4-STABLE system. After a fresh installworld, I am
> GTF> looking at files that did not get touched by the install. Is it safe to
> GTF> remove all such fil
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 11:52:55PM -0600, Geoffrey T. Falk wrote:
> I am cleaning up my 4-STABLE system. After a fresh installworld, I am
> looking at files that did not get touched by the install. Is it safe to
> remove all such files?
No, it is not always safe. Some files are only updated if th
*** THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE *** A mail message sent from this account to a Cisco
employee had an attachment called your_details.zip. The file your_details.zip
contained a virus. Please contact your local System Administrator for further
assistance.
___
Yesterday I begin a couple of update to the latest 4.8-STABLE.
After that the two boxes continues to go in panics as soon as Apache (1.3
from the ports, also freshly recompiled, 2.0.x seems NOT to hang) starts.
I don't know if it is related to the other thread : "Kernel core dump in
recent 4.8-S
Eric J. Chet wrote:
[...]
Just a sanity check. I'm seeing a garbled display with top. I
rebuild kernel and world a couple times, I even rm -rf /usr/include to
make sure I was up to date. Anybody else seeing this?
Define garbled.
Thanks,
David
Sure
Script started on Mon Jun 23 10
I have a brand new IBM 335 with IDE controller and I have the same
keyboard problem. The keyboard is working at bios/bootloader and stop
to work when freebsd kernel boot.
I get this error "atkbd: unable to set the command byte."
Any clue?
uname -a
FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE
verbose boot
Jun 26 14:50:59 kernel: atkbdc0: port
0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0
Jun 26 14:50:59 kernel: atkbd0: flags 0x1 irq 1 on atkbdc0
Jun 26 14:50:59 kernel: atkbd: the current kbd controller command byte 0065
Jun 26 14:50:59 kernel: atkbd: unable to set the command byte.
Jun 26 14:50:59
13 matches
Mail list logo
