Robert Withrow wrote:
> Man, am I read in the face!!!
>
> I just got through writing that I had built a kernel with this:
>
> :- options DISABLE_PSE
>
> but I just went and looked and found out I had edited GENERIC but built the
> kernel with another config file:
[ ... ]
> Whoops!
>
> So i
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 01:26:50PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> John Baldwin wrote:
> > > I can appreciate matcd being dropped for 5.0 on pragmatic grounds, but
> > > it would have been nice to have it ride out the rest of 4.x, given that
> > > it actually works right now. (As I understand it, i
On 2002-Oct-07 16:48:28 +0100, Mark Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I can appreciate matcd being dropped for 5.0 on pragmatic grounds, but
>> it would have been nice to have it ride out the rest of 4.x, given that
>> it actually works right now. (As I understand it, it's the adoption
>> of G
On 2002-Oct-06 16:19:08 +0200, Christoph Moench-Tegeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>## Daniel O'Connor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
>> Actually, if you limit incoming TCP it will adapt to the correct speed.
>> I do this at home without hassle (except the latency in games goes up
>> from ~40 to ~100 but
> BTW, is there a way to completely disable PAM on a system?
I was looking at it a couple months back. There is
the NOPAM compiler flag. Unfortunately, telnet and
ssh does not obey it. I have some untested patch
at home before I got too busy with other non-FreeBSD
things
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 04:57:39PM -0600, Samuel Chow wrote:
>
>
> > BTW, is there a way to completely disable PAM on a system?
>
> I was looking at it a couple months back. There is
> the NOPAM compiler flag. Unfortunately, telnet and
> ssh does not obey it. I have some unteste
## Peter Jeremy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> ipfw/dummynet pipes only handle a single flow direction: If you
> have something like
> ipfw NUMBER pipe 1 ip from any to any via ifX
> then both incoming and outgoing traffic share the pipe and you are
> limiting the combined uplink and downlink traffic
On Sun, 6 Oct 2002 13:31-0700, Kevin G. Eliuk wrote:
>=20
>=20
>>I have been unable to build www/mozilla and have recently done a fresh
>>cvsup of the ports collection to weed out any errors. The same error i=
s
>>occuring at different location of the build at every build attempt.
>>
>>If no one
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 04:20:51PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 04:57:39PM -0600, Samuel Chow wrote:
> >
> >
> > > BTW, is there a way to completely disable PAM on a system?
> >
> > I was looking at it a couple months back. There is
> > the NOPAM compiler flag.
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 04:56:24PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 06:42:48PM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 04:20:51PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 04:57:39PM -0600, Samuel Chow wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > BTW, is th
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 06:42:48PM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 04:20:51PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 04:57:39PM -0600, Samuel Chow wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > BTW, is there a way to completely disable PAM on a system?
> > >
> > > I was loo
- Original Message -
From: "Kris Kennaway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > BTW, is there a way to completely disable PAM on a system?
> >
> > I was looking at it a couple months back. There is
> > the NOPAM compiler flag. Unfortunately, telnet and
> > ssh does not obey it. I
I posted a problem with 4.7 RC, when I installed the port for mod_php4, it could
not finish configuration.
Where should I be posting this?
Thanks in advance for any help.
A.G.
--
___
A.G. Russell IV KC5KFDThe Kni
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 06:34:33PM -0600, Samuel Chow wrote:
> > PAM is considered to be an integral part of the system
> > thesedays; as such there's no support for compiling without
> > it.
>
> I was trying to trim FreeBSD to below 16MB and to run it
> as an embedded system. I find
14 matches
Mail list logo
