On Sun, 9 Jun 2002, Alessandro de Manzano wrote:
[snip a bit]
AdM> > Well, next thougt: maybe it's kinda chicken'n'egg problem: if you have
AdM> > build machine, made there a buildworld, and then export both /usr/src and
AdM> > /usr/obj via read-only NFS, you have exactly the same problem...
AdM
:
:
:Hi Matt,
:
:> I'm still playing with this. Actually, I'm still playing with this
:> for the first time! I started building the port on my workstation
:> yesterday afternoon and, well, it's *still* building 24 hours later!
:> Holy cow!
:
:Hehe.
:
:It takes 6 hours here with
On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 10:47:47AM -0600, Korey Pelton typed:
> Carl,
>
> Yesterday evening, I exchanged the line "*default tag=RELENG_4_5" with
> "*default tag=RELENG_4_6" and cvsup looked like it added a bunch of stuff,
> so I assume 4.6 is good to go. I am a newbie, so if anything I say s
At 10:47 AM 6/9/2002 -0600, Korey Pelton wrote:
>Carl,
>
>Yesterday evening, I exchanged the line "*default tag=RELENG_4_5" with
>"*default tag=RELENG_4_6" and cvsup looked like it added a bunch of
>stuff, so I assume 4.6 is good to go. I am a newbie, so if anything I say
>sounds rediculous,
as far as i have found in the archives 4.x doesnt support if alias in jails.
is current already to be used on a production box where this is needed? want
to avoid to setup 5 jails to have the needed 5 IPs?
--
--
Best regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen,
Karl M. Joch
http://www.freebsd.at - Power
On 2002-06-09 20:23:25, Ruben de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 10:47:47AM -0600, Korey Pelton typed:
> > Yesterday evening, I exchanged the line "*default tag=RELENG_4_5" with
> > "*default tag=RELENG_4_6" and cvsup looked like it added a bunch of
> > stuff, so I ass
On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 09:09:12AM -0600, Ian wrote:
> On 06/09/02 01:29, Gary D Kline wrote:
>
> >
> > Having sweated thru 2+ days withmy switch, I believe ever word!
> > But:: how old is your KVM switch? If it has a PS/2 port only,
> > you should try
> >
> > Protocol "Auto"
> >
> > in the
thank you, looking forward for this patch.
---
Vlad
On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 12:41:43PM -0500, David Syphers wrote:
> On Saturday 08 June 2002 03:42 pm, Mikko Tyolajarvi wrote:
> > In local.freebsd.stable you write:
> >
> > >FreeBSD ariel.phys.wesleyan.edu 4.6-RC FreeBSD 4.6-RC #32: Wed May 29
>
Hello.
I have seen a few threads with regards to having a problem with
ATAPI cdroms, on 4.6.rcx, and I also have the same problems..
I have several different hardware configurations that I have tested this
with, as well as versions..
4.5 was the last version that worked across the board..
4.6 RC2
Hi all,
Apologies if this isn't the right group, but I'm curious as to why there's a
version 4.8 of FreeBSD being released more than 2 months after version 5 has
been released.
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.370 /
So far, I have six ways of configuring your input//pointer /dev.
I'd like at least 20 more before getting together a publishable
list. So if any other BSD users want to contribute, please cut
and paste the Input|Pointer Section from your XF86Config and
if you are running m
On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 11:53:03PM +0100, Danny Horne wrote:
> Apologies if this isn't the right group, but I'm curious as to why there's a
> version 4.8 of FreeBSD being released more than 2 months after version 5 has
> been released.
4.8 has not been released, and neither has 5. 4.6 is about to
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Johnson
> Sent: Sunday 9 June 2002 11:58pm
> To: Danny Horne
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Curious about release schedule
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 11:53:03PM +0100, Danny Horne wrote
14 matches
Mail list logo
