Re: Binary Security Branch Patches

2002-03-20 Thread Jacques A. Vidrine
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 04:29:25PM -0800, Crist J. Clark wrote: > Are there binary patches? Is the binary patch project alive? The lack > of information about binary patches in security advisories leads me to > believe if something does exist, it's not really ready for primetime > yet? That's rig

Re: Problems with large disk. (> 1 TB)

2002-03-20 Thread Steve O'Hara-Smith
On Tue, 19 Mar 2002 23:20:49 -0800 David Greenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: DG> >On Tue, 19 Mar 2002 20:21:37 -0800 DG> >Jaye Mathisen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: DG> > DG> >JM> I dont' need a 1 TB FS, I just need/wanted to be able to create DG> >JM> multiple partitions < 1TB on a disk/slice > 1T

Re: Problems with large disk. (> 1 TB)

2002-03-20 Thread David Greenman
>DG> >JM> multiple partitions < 1TB on a disk/slice > 1TB in size. >DG> > >DG> > I posted the answer to the wrong question then - you will need >DG> >multiple slices to do this with each under 1TB. >DG> >DG>That won't work either. FreeBSD cannot access blocks beyond 1TB on any >DG> device. I

Re: wi broken?

2002-03-20 Thread Alan Clegg
Unless the network is lying to me again, M. Warner Losh said: > : | I read where others have had to do a "ifconfig fxp0 down" first before > : | they can bring their wi devices up, but "ifconfig rl0 down" didn't work > : | for me. When I try to invoke dhclient on wi0, I immediately get this: >

Re: Problems with large disk. (> 1 TB)

2002-03-20 Thread Matthew Dillon
:> I thought fdisk slices were separate devices to FreeBSD so it should :>be possible to put 1TB on each. Where did I go wrong this time, does FreeBSD :>need to see the whole drive as a single device too ? : : They're only seperate devices in the same sense that a different partition :is a

Re: reproducable panic with python

2002-03-20 Thread Jan Srzednicki
On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Matthew Dillon wrote: > Yes, this has been fixed. Python was using MAP_ANON|MAP_NOSYNC > mmap()'s and this resulted in the possibility of msync() encountering > an optimized vm_map_entry that did not yet have a VM object associated > with it, causing a panic.

Re: portupgrade insists on tty output

2002-03-20 Thread Brandon S. Allbery
On Wed, 2002-03-20 at 10:09, Sergei Vyshenski wrote: > Bringing the job to foreground with fg produces NO output > on the screen, and calmly proceeds with portupgrade. > > What does portupgrade want to say to tty? The latest portupgrade wants to be able to ask questions, so it apparently opens /