/usr/local/etc/rc.d/apache.sh question

2001-12-27 Thread Peter/Los Angeles, CA
Hello, I have some understanding of how the script works, but I'm not sure what it's asking for. [09:37][root@interim:/usr/local/etc/rc.d]# ls apache.sh* [09:37][root@interim:/usr/local/etc/rc.d]# ./apache.sh start ./apache.sh: Cannot determine the PREFIX That's what I get. The following will

Re: /usr/local/etc/rc.d/apache.sh question

2001-12-27 Thread H. Wade Minter
On Thu, 27 Dec 2001, Peter/Los Angeles, CA wrote: > I have some understanding of how the script works, but I'm not sure what > it's asking for. > > [09:37][root@interim:/usr/local/etc/rc.d]# ls > apache.sh* > [09:37][root@interim:/usr/local/etc/rc.d]# ./apache.sh start > ./apache.sh: Cannot deter

Re: /usr/local/etc/rc.d/apache.sh question

2001-12-27 Thread Sergey A. Osokin
On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 09:38:40AM -0800, Peter/Los Angeles, CA wrote: > Hello, > > I have some understanding of how the script works, but I'm not sure what > it's asking for. > > [09:37][root@interim:/usr/local/etc/rc.d]# ls > apache.sh* > [09:37][root@interim:/usr/local/etc/rc.d]# ./apache.sh

Re: /usr/local/etc/rc.d/apache.sh question

2001-12-27 Thread Alson van der Meulen
Peter/Los Angeles, CA([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.12.27 09:38:40 +: > Hello, > > I have some understanding of how the script works, but I'm not sure what > it's asking for. > > [09:37][root@interim:/usr/local/etc/rc.d]# ls > apache.sh* > [09:37][root@interim:/usr/local/etc/rc.d]# ./apache.sh sta

Re: /usr/local/etc/rc.d/apache.sh question

2001-12-27 Thread Peter/Los Angeles, CA
You guys are great. Thanks a lot. I owe you guys my first born. Peter - Original Message - From: "H. Wade Minter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Peter/Los Angeles, CA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:43 AM Subject: Re: /usr/local/etc/rc.d/apache

apache question part2

2001-12-27 Thread Peter/Los Angeles, CA
Dear People, Thank you for your help with my initial apache question. I don't know if this is a malfunction or what, although it seems to work. I opened up the router, and directed it to my server at home. It's responding so I know the daemon is working. The number of times that I've used apa

Re: Where can I get (download) Free BSD 2.2.7 Release ?

2001-12-27 Thread Chad R. Larson
On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 09:39:39AM +0500, Igor I. Ushatinsky wrote: > Hi, Vladimir! >> I couldn/t find it at ftp://ftp.freebsd.org > > You may find 2.1.7.1-RELEASE at > ftp://ftp4.ru.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ I have the CD set for 2.1.7 and 2.2.8. If you can't find it elsewhere, I

Re: 4.5 PRERELEASE - Call for testing

2001-12-27 Thread Chad R. Larson
On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 09:30:20PM -0800, Philip J. Koenig wrote: > On 26 Dec 2001, at 19:56, William Carrel boldly uttered: >> Using switch settings to obtain this sort of configuration/protection is >> at best crude. Try dummynet(4) and/or some QoS capable network >> hardware. > > The swi

Re: /usr/local/etc/rc.d/apache.sh question

2001-12-27 Thread Peter/Los Angeles, CA
Thanks. - Original Message - From: "Josh Tolbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Peter/Los Angeles, CA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 10:05 AM Subject: Re: /usr/local/etc/rc.d/apache.sh question > Peter, > Take a look at what the script is doing.

RE: apache question part2

2001-12-27 Thread Mit Rowe
turn off Multiviews in /usr/local/etc/apache/httpd.conf ;-) > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Peter/Los Angeles, > CA > Sent: December 27, 2001 12:53 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: apache question part2 > > > Dear People, > > Tha

RE: apache question part2

2001-12-27 Thread Mit Rowe
sorry, i should have been more specific... there is at least one line (maybe more) in the apache config file that says... Options ... Multiviews remove the multiviews part, leaving the rest, and run apachectl restart > -Original Message- > From: Mit Rowe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE

tcpd not installed on 4.5-PRERELEASE

2001-12-27 Thread Matthias Andree
Hello, I just cleandir'ed out my whole /usr/obj/src and rebuilt the world (4.5-PRERELEASE), installed it, and figured that tcpd seems to be missing from the install, while tcpdchk and tcpdmatch are installed. What's up here? Did I do something wrong? Is this worth a send-pr? Or is tcpd just not p

Gnome

2001-12-27 Thread Sam Drinkard
Probably not the right place to ask, but am trying to start upgrading my ports junque. Gnome bombs out in the controlcenter... I assume there is a sequence to doing the build of gnome, but "core" and "build" both bomb out when trying to build controlcenter. Problem appears to be structure relat

Re: 4.4-STABLE crashes - suspects new ata-driver over wd-drivers

2001-12-27 Thread Matthew Dillon
This is great news! I'm crossing my fingers and hoping that Nils can't reproduce the crash any more with Soren's fix. Just to let you all know, Nils has been working his ass off helping me track his crash down. I've been pulling my hair out... I gave him patch after patch to

Re: Trying NT Hacks

2001-12-27 Thread Kutulu
From: "Peter Ong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 7:02 PM Subject: Re: Trying NT Hacks > Really... I just wonder how they figure out the IPs, other than randomly > guessing. Someone did mention that, and I guess there really aren't that > many IP addresses that a computer

Re: Trying NT Hacks

2001-12-27 Thread Sam Drinkard
One thing that works for me is the portsentry. It's pretty simple, but blocks portscans on a large number of ports, can be configured for tcp or udp., etc.. I have noticed an increase in port 111 and 119 attempts since I started posting here.. mostly random people, and I do frequent lookups. If

Re: Trying NT Hacks

2001-12-27 Thread jacks
I put up a brand new server with a brand new IP and the attacks were immediate so, I figured they are just running loose in swarms... At 07:02 PM 12.27.2001 -0800, Peter Ong wrote: >Really... I just wonder how they figure out the IPs, other than randomly >guessing. Someone did mention that,

Re: Trying NT Hacks

2001-12-27 Thread Greg Black
This thread has nothing to do with stable -- take it to chat, or just drop it. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

SMP kernel (still) faulting.

2001-12-27 Thread Robin P. Blanchard
I never saw this message go through to the list, so I'm trying again. Sorry if this a double... Looks like I spoke too soon. I checked on the box Sunday afternoon and saw that it wasn't responding, but was out of town and couldn't do anything about it. I arrived Wednesday to find the box hung,

SMP kernel (still) faulting.

2001-12-27 Thread Robin P. Blanchard
Matt -- Looks like I spoke too soon. I checked on the box Sunday afternoon and saw that it wasn't responding, but was out of town and couldn't do anything about it. I arrived today to find the box hung, again, despite the MAXUSERS=512 option: #0 dumpsys () at ../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:473

Re: what a can of worms! (Gnome flames)

2001-12-27 Thread Ross Lippert
Hey, I once tried to do a pure make kde2 from the ports and it took more than a day on a 300 Mhz. Granted it was a 56k modem, but at least 80% of the time was in the compile. I gave up and used the CD's. When you look at the gnome philosophy, which is having a bazillion g-apps written by ev

Re: Problem with /usr/ports/graphics/glide3

2001-12-27 Thread Matthew Whelan
27/12/2001 22:48:36, Josh Tolbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I have a working X 4.1.0/DRI setup for my voodoo3/3000 at home >(documentation of how I managed to get it working is at >http://halcyon.scoundrelz.net/~hemi/dri.txt). I found a PC at work and >decided I'd try to replicate my X