Re: dirpref gives massive performance boost

2001-09-30 Thread Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mike Harding writes: > > Um - what about my question? Is the newfs necessary? Repartitioning, > backup, and restore also require a backup medium, etc. The more of your filesystem that has had its files allocated using the new dirpref, the greater the benefit.

Re: dirpref gives massive performance boost

2001-09-30 Thread Mike Harding
So it sounds like there would be some benefit in tar'ing and untarring /usr/local, /usr/ports, /usr/src, etc. which will be less disruptive... Thanks! - Mike H. X-Authentication-Warning: cwsys.cwsent.com: smtpd set sender to using -f Reply-To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <[EMA

Dirpref in what branch?

2001-09-30 Thread Sven Hazejager
Hi, I've followed the dirpref discussion with great interest, and I wonder in what branch the update appears. I currently run 4.4-Release and I've set up my cvsup to update the source to RELENG_4_4. Should I change this to RELENG_4 for the dirpref update? I'd rather not risk stability (hence

Sound problem in 4.4-STABLE...

2001-09-30 Thread Thomas
After my latest cvsup ( Sun Sep 23 ) and make world, I noticed that sound stops working with just about every program besides xmms/mpg123. (namely vice, snes9x) This was working before, on 4.3-STABLE. My sound hardware is: pcm0: port 0xefe0-0xefe7,0xeff0-0xeff7 mem 0xfebc-0xfebf irq 10