I'm probably going to make an ass out of myself¸ which has certainly
happened before. Still, a disclaimer: I don't know what I'm talking
about. Take everything I say with the whole canister of salt.
As I understand it, a symbol describes the relative entry point of a
function in a given block of
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 02:14:21AM -0500, Mikhail Kruk wrote:
> Hi,
> So what's up with nlist in systat and top?
>
> Here is the output of systat:
>
> systat: nlist: can't find following symbols:
> _ccpu
> _fscale
See the FAQ.
Kris
PGP signature
Yeah, except that it doesn't list my problem. Well, now when I look at it
I realize that if I was any smarter I'd figure it out, but I just looked
at it and said to myself "Your kernel and userland are not synchronized?"
nope, that's not me, and kind of ignored tha second part of the paragraph
whi
[skip]
> When you try to run top, it looks for the symbol that represents nlist,
> and when it can't find it, it doesn't know where to find the nlist
> kernel function. I'm guessing nlist has something to do with a process
> list... hence, when top can't find nlist, it throws a fit.
I think nlis
XF86 4 on 4.3-RELEASE?
Anyone know if this will be the case?
Cheers,
--
Irvine Short
Sys Admin
SANBI, University of the Western Cape, South Africa
http://www.sanbi.ac.za
tel: +27-21-959 3645
fax: +27-21-959 2512
cel: +27-82-494 3828
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsu
Le 2001-03-09, Irvine Short écrivait :
> XF86 4 on 4.3-RELEASE?
> Anyone know if this will be the case?
The XFree 4 port already builds and works flawlessly on 4.2-STABLE.
Thomas.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 03:24:02AM +, j mckitrick wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I recently heard that there might be filtered mailing lists out there that
> only contain cvs entries that are being applied to -stable. Has anyone seen
> these? How can I subscribe? It seems that might be a good com
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 10:19:07AM +, Josef Karthauser wrote:
> It's my long term goal to produce a proper branch mailing list, but this
> means doing clever stuff with the commits because it's possible for a
> committer to affect more than one branch at a time.
And it would be even more coo
On 9 Mar 2001, at 10:19, Josef Karthauser wrote:
> There isn't such a list currently, but for a while every commit to
> cvs-all has contained a header that you can filter on for the branch
> that you're interested in:
>
> X-FreeBSD-CVS-Branch: RELENG_4,HEAD
It's possible in theory, but how oft
For anyone that's interested, this has been MFC'd to -stable now.
Use 'netstat -i' to return the stats associated with a particular
interface. ATM we only support IPv4 and IPv6 stats.
Joe
On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 02:20:27PM -0500, Michael R. Wayne wrote:
>
> Back on Nov 7, 2000, Josef Karthaus
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 11:53:10PM +1300, Dan Langille wrote:
> On 9 Mar 2001, at 10:19, Josef Karthauser wrote:
>
> > There isn't such a list currently, but for a while every commit to
> > cvs-all has contained a header that you can filter on for the branch
> > that you're interested in:
> >
>
On 9 Mar 2001, at 10:55, Josef Karthauser wrote:
> > > It's my long term goal to produce a proper branch mailing list, but
> > > this means doing clever stuff with the commits because it's possible
> > > for a committer to affect more than one branch at a time.
> >
> > This is also a goal of Fre
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 11:58:56PM +1300, Dan Langille wrote:
> On 9 Mar 2001, at 10:55, Josef Karthauser wrote:
>
> > > > It's my long term goal to produce a proper branch mailing list, but
> > > > this means doing clever stuff with the commits because it's possible
> > > > for a committer to af
On 9 Mar 2001, at 11:01, Josef Karthauser wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 11:58:56PM +1300, Dan Langille wrote:
> > On 9 Mar 2001, at 10:55, Josef Karthauser wrote:
> >
> > > > > It's my long term goal to produce a proper branch mailing list, but
> > > > > this means doing clever stuff with the
On Fri, 9 Mar 2001, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
> Nope. When XFree86 4.x:
>
>a) Supports a reasonable superset of all cards supported by 3.3.6
>
>b) Doesn't halve OpenGL performance on cards like Matrox and nVidia
> (3dfx sucks so much on both that it's not an issue).
>
>
Gordon Tetlow wrote:
>
> On Fri, 9 Mar 2001, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
>
> > Nope. When XFree86 4.x:
> >
> >a) Supports a reasonable superset of all cards supported by 3.3.6
> >
> >b) Doesn't halve OpenGL performance on cards like Matrox and nVidia
> > (3dfx sucks so muc
On Fri, 9 Mar 2001, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> I have not seen this in the sysctl man page - so I haven't used it either.
> Where can I get more info about it?
Try searching the FreeBSD mailing lists. It's usually associated with
the way the kernel maintains timekeeping with APM not being buil
lo there,
I swear at some point I had q3test working under freebsd 4.0 with my voodoo2
card. The day the full retail version came out, I tried in vain for about a week to
get it working and gave up. I've decided to try again. I started out with a google
search, and only turned up docume
18 matches
Mail list logo
