> > And why not symlink apache_php3&4 to mod_php???
>
> The ports system doesn't use symlinks.
So why don't delete the old one?
> > Anyway you time-response is amazing. =)
>
> I'm a species of the "American night owl".
I'm italian and here is 10:30 AM, anyway thanks again =)
Paolo
To Unsub
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 10:33:22AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > The ports system doesn't use symlinks.
>
> So why don't delete the old one?
The files are gone, the directory structure probably remains because of
a README.html file or extra stuff left over. I use cvs and not cvsup so
I'm
"Kuriyama, Kent K Mr (CPF N651KK)" wrote:
>
> Chris,
>
> Your email prompted me to look at mbuf utilization on a 4.1.1-STABLE box
> that is currently not in production.
>
> outside# netstat -m
> 130/160/7168 mbufs in use (current/peak/max):
> 129 mbufs allocated to data
> 1 mbuf
At 4:05 PM -0700 2000/10/12, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote:
> _FFR_'s are not documented. FFR stands for for-future-release.
Understood.
> Yes, BSD systems can use STARTTLS without sfio.
Cool. I was not aware that sendmail was capable of using
multiple different stdio librari
>"Kuriyama, Kent K Mr (CPF N651KK)" wrote:
>>
>> Chris,
>>
>> Your email prompted me to look at mbuf utilization on a 4.1.1-STABLE box
>> that is currently not in production.
>>
>> outside# netstat -m
>> 130/160/7168 mbufs in use (current/peak/max):
>> 129 mbufs allocated to data
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, David Greenman wrote:
...
:Perhaps I should have spoken up earlier, but none of these reports has
: indicated a problem. The "92%" above is the percent of buffers that have been
: allocated and are currently in-use. The system
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bill Paul
writes:
> The xl driver never holds more than 128 mbuf clusters in the receive ring.
> Whenever a new packet comes in, it sends one of the mbufs out and replaces
> it with a new one. IT DOESN'T HOLD ONTO THEM. It will however complain if
> it can't alloca
I just installed 4.1.1-RELEASE on a dual 100mhz ALR Evolution that has a
LinkSys 100 nic, Diamond Stealth 64 4mb vision 964, ISA Vibra16
Soundblaster(non-pnp), DPT PM2022A scsi controller which has 2 2G seagate
barracuda, 1 Quantum Fireball (1.2 G), 1 DEC (1 G) and a NEC 3x CDROM drive
on it.
I w
Yes they are disabled.
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan Edmonds [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, October 13, 2000 7:19 AM
> To: Perik, Mike
> Subject: Re: boot problems
>
> Did you disable the IDE controllers in the BIOS?
> The ata driver is the IDE controller drive
I noticed a while ago that only the ports that were installed at
originall install time actually have a README.html and news ones that
appear during cvsup don't. This seems to inidcate that the .html
files are not part of the cvs ports tree. Anyone else noticed this or know
why?
Andrew
On Thu, 1
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 02:04:45PM +0100, Andrew Tulloch wrote:
> I noticed a while ago that only the ports that were installed at
> originall install time actually have a README.html and news ones that
> appear during cvsup don't. This seems to inidcate that the .html
> files are not part of the
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 09:13:43AM -0800, Jason Neumann wrote:
> Greetings,
> A few days ago I received a 'Fatal Trap 12' followed by a spontaneous
> reboot on 4.1.1-stable. My installed src was up to date as of Sept. 29,
> 2000.
A common cause of this is loading modules which are out of date wi
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Andrew Tulloch wrote:
> I noticed a while ago that only the ports that were installed at
> originall install time actually have a README.html and news ones that
> appear during cvsup don't. This seems to inidcate that the .html
> files are not part of the cvs ports tree. Anyo
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Jeffrey J. Mountin wrote:
> IMO, WD went to pot years back their choice on concentrating on the low end
> market doesn't help. Seagate's IDE drives seem to have been among the
> slowest around. Years back started having better results with Maxtor and
> then IBM came in wi
14 matches
Mail list logo