Hello
Attached is an email , documenting the exact problem
I'm experiencing now.
The machine is running 3.4 Stable. It's a fairly busy
shell server with all the standard toys.
In short , ps -a ... or ps -u fails with no error , and
is not able to be killed , and exists in a pfslo
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 07:10:10PM +0900, Makoto MATSUSHITA wrote:
> > But wait, wait a minute...
> >
> > If you wanna say "make release", you already know about that an
> > exciting, cool, and misterious world is there. Why not adding
> > vn_load="YES" to your loader.conf and reboot ?
>
> 1.
Is it painless to do this upgrade? The UPDATING file is very small and
contains almost nothing.
I've gotten so used to the `make build/installkernel` in 4.1-STABLE.
This is not implemented in the 3-branch, or?
--
__o
regards, Gunnar ---_ \<,_
email: [EMAIL PROTE
On Fri, 29 Sep 2000, Gunnar Flygt wrote:
| Is it painless to do this upgrade? The UPDATING file is very small and
| contains almost nothing.
|
| I've gotten so used to the `make build/installkernel` in 4.1-STABLE.
| This is not implemented in the 3-branch, or?
It's a stroll in the park, just cv
On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 03:11:19PM -0700, Tom wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Jared Chenkin wrote:
>
> > I'm having some space problems on my FreeBSD 3.3-STABLE box.
> > The problem is that the previous administrator did not give
> > me alot of space on the root partition, and now its at 95%
> > an
FreeBSD-4.1.1 distribution has a useful script meant for
enforced fetch of mail from secondary mx-servers:
/usr/src/contrib/sendmail/contrib/etrn.pl
It begins with a line "#!/usr/local/bin/perl",
while default location of perl here seems to be /usr/bin/perl.
Without correcting it, script just sa
Hello,
I noticed some strange behavior in pthreads applications,
close on socket which is in accept() will be blocked untill there's a connection
to port and accept returns.
It's observed on 4.0 - 4.1-STABLE, perhaps 4.1.1-STABLE as well, but I didn't
try it. I don't have 3.5.1-STABLE system to t
* Roman Shterenzon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000929 01:23] wrote:
> Hello,
> I noticed some strange behavior in pthreads applications,
> close on socket which is in accept() will be blocked untill there's a connection
> to port and accept returns.
> It's observed on 4.0 - 4.1-STABLE, perhaps 4.1.1-STAB
Quoting Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I attach example program, which, when receives SIGUSR1 should close
> the socket,
> > but, in fact gets blocked in the close() function.
> > Obviously it's waiting to acquire some lock.
> > Does anyone have an idea?
>
> Yes, I have an idea and an
I own a couple of the PowerWare Prestige 1500VA units with extra
external battery packs, and have some documentation. Running a
FreeBSD system, a Windows98 box, my cable modem and NAT/Firewall
gets me about an hour of keep-alive.
The serial port on the back can be kicked into several different
m
* Roman Shterenzon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000929 01:52] wrote:
> Quoting Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > I attach example program, which, when receives SIGUSR1 should close
> > the socket,
> > > but, in fact gets blocked in the close() function.
> > > Obviously it's waiting to acquire so
11 matches
Mail list logo
