Re: kerneld for FreeBSD

2000-06-05 Thread Mike Smith
> * Mike Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000605 16:58] wrote: > > > > > Well, it would be nice to auto-load or unload any module that is needed. > > > not just ethernet and fs types. That's basically the idea. Say, if you > > > load a driver that uses some resources that another one can use while the

Re: changed pci bus probe order from 3.2 to 4.0 -- ideas?

2000-06-05 Thread Fred Clift
> > The PCI spec basicly states that buses are to be probed depth first. As a > PCI bridge is found, it is assigned the next sequential bus number and > probed for additional bridges beyond it. As a new bridge is found, all the > parent bridges' subordinat bus number register is updated to the hi

Re: changed pci bus probe order from 3.2 to 4.0 -- ideas?

2000-06-05 Thread Jason
From: "Fred Clift" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hm so does that mean that non-bridge devices on those busses should also > be done depth first? I understand wanting to find all the busses first, > but devices too? All the bioses I've seen seem to find all the busses, > then assign resources to devices

Re: changed pci bus probe order from 3.2 to 4.0 -- ideas?

2000-06-05 Thread Jason
From: "Kenneth D. Merry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > The problem is that when the new-bus code was introduced, the probe order > was changed from a bus-by-bus probe (breadth first?) to a depth-first > probe. > > i.e. as soon as another PCI bus is found (e.g. on a bridge chip) it is > probed, rather than

HEADS UP: Another Vinum RAID-5 data integrity problem (*sigh*)

2000-06-05 Thread Greg Lehey
I've only just fixed one problem in RAID-5 revive, and another one has surfaced. For the moment: if you have a RAID-5 plex with a dead subdisk, leave it that way. It's safer than restarting it. I think I should have it fixed relatively quickly. Watch this space. Greg -- Finger [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: kerneld for FreeBSD

2000-06-05 Thread Coleman Kane
No, they are technically shareable, as long as you don't attept to expect either of them at the software level to respond at a certain time. This is why you can have COM2 and COM4 on the same interrupt in windows or DOS, as long as you don't use them at the same time. The ISA bus is a very simple

Re: kerneld for FreeBSD

2000-06-05 Thread Coleman Kane
Sorry, been working a strange schedule this week. By resources, I meant kernel resources such as kmem space, from what I have been hearing though, it seems as though the kernel does a lot this stuff already. I dunno, but someone else posted awhile back about this, so I was still interested. Mike