On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 08:40:53AM +0200, Szilveszter Adam wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 10:32:49AM +1000, Gary Roberts wrote:
>
[snip]
> > 2. It caused W98 to crash more frequently when she was trying to `push'.
>
> Hmmm I cannot comment on this one, the w9x line is fairly easy to crash..
On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 07:58:19PM +0100, Mark Ovens wrote:
> Doesn't W95 hang after 47.9(?) days anyway ;-)
I have a Windows box across the lab here, while running Windows 95 (one
of the older releases) it often attained 200-250 day uptimes. In stark
contrast, under Windows 98, it usually lasts
On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 04:29:00PM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
> > "MM" == Mike Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> MM> The small pause for me was for ATA devices. I no longer need them (no
> MM> ide/atapi devices in system) and the boot just flies right past that point.
> MM> The boot time on
Hi!
Will FreeBSD 4.1 be released on schedule?
If so, does someone tell me when it will be?
Thanks in advance.
Hideki Yamamoto
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
> Will FreeBSD 4.1 be released on schedule?
> If so, does someone tell me when it will be?
Yes, it will be released on July 15th.
- Jordan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Hello,
"Jordan K. Hubbard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in Wed, 17 May 2000 01:28:25 -0700
Subject:Re: FreeBSD 4.1 schedule
Message-ID: <27072.958552105@localhost>
jkh> > Will FreeBSD 4.1 be released on schedule?
jkh> > If so, does someone tell me when it will be?
jkh>
jkh> Yes, it will be r
subscribe freebsd-stable
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 10:32:49AM +1000, Gary Roberts wrote:
> Chad R. Larson writes :-
>
> > As I recall, David Gilbert wrote:
> > > I must say that I'm dissapointed that I can't run it.
> >
> > This is older hat, but I've had WordPerfect 8 running on a
> > 2.2.8-STABLE system under Linux emul
In message <8fsc3j$2tl$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michel Oosterhof wrote:
>Does anyone know if this card is supported? I know some other ESS models are.
>My card is an on-board pci card, i added the pcm device in my kernel, but it
>is not recognized (I just get the unknown pci device found at...etc).
>
On 17-May-00 Takanori Watanabe wrote:
> I wrote a patch to newpcm that recognize ESS Solo and get
> ESS solo mixer work.(PCM will *not* work)
Do you have a variation of this patch for -stable ? It seems the ess.c
split is only in -current at the moment.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [
On Wed, 17 May 2000, Ted Sikora wrote:
> 4.0-STABLE I just found this after experiencing some system slowdowns
> under OpenMotif's mwm.
> kvm_open: proc size mismatch (42968 total, 1044 chunks)
> top: Out of memory.
Recompile libkvm (/usr/src/lib/libkvm), install it, and then that dreaded
messa
On Wed, May 17, 2000 at 08:29:02AM +0200, Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor] wrote:
>
> Hmm, I'm also not entirely happy with 4.0 sound: I can't seem to be
> able to record at a decent sampling rate. I have two boxes, one with:
>
> pcm0: port 0xd000-0xd03f irq 5 at device 11.0 on pci0
>
> (Th
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Steve O'Hara-Smith" wrote:
>
>On 17-May-00 Takanori Watanabe wrote:
>> I wrote a patch to newpcm that recognize ESS Solo and get
>> ESS solo mixer work.(PCM will *not* work)
>
>Do you have a variation of this patch for -stable ? It seems the ess.c
>split i
13 matches
Mail list logo
