Problems with libtool

2000-04-23 Thread Gunnar Flygt
Am I the only one having problem with the port /usr/ports/devele/libtool? It was some application that needed libtool-1.3.4 Since then no port needing libtool works anymore, The old one I had was 1.3.3 Now all apps that I try to make as "imlib", "gdbm" and so on claims that libtool is of a too ol

SCSI on ATAPI simulation, cdrecord

2000-04-23 Thread Stefanus Du Toit
Hi, a short while ago I purchased a new IDE/ATAPI CD Rewriter/Recorder from Kodak. Ever since I've been looking all over the web for information on how to get the thing to work with cdrecord in FreeBSD. Unfortunately cdrecord only seems to work with SCSI drives. I know that Linux has a SCSI-on-A

RE: SCSI on ATAPI simulation, cdrecord

2000-04-23 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On 23-Apr-00 Stefanus Du Toit wrote: > a short while ago I purchased a new IDE/ATAPI CD Rewriter/Recorder from > Kodak. Ever since I've been looking all over the web for information on > how to get the thing to work with cdrecord in FreeBSD. Unfortunately > cdrecord only seems to work with SCSI d

Re: SCSI on ATAPI simulation, cdrecord

2000-04-23 Thread Stefanus Du Toit
Thanks for all your quick replies, I will be looking at burncd right now. Keep up the good work, -- Stefanus Du Toit * WorldForger * Unix Hacker * Open Source Fanatic mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.worldforge.org/ * http://ultracool.net/ On Sun, 23 Apr 2000, Stefanus Du Toit wrote: > Hi

Re: SCSI on ATAPI simulation, cdrecord (fwd)

2000-04-23 Thread Stefanus Du Toit
Hi Jens/freebsd-stable, well, I just burnt a CD-R with burncd and it worked fine. I had to remake my /dev/acdx entries, which I forgot after upgrading to 4.0-S, but otherwise everything worked just fine. -- Stefanus Du Toit * WorldForger * Unix Hacker * Open Source Fanatic mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT

Copying CDs (with dd?)

2000-04-23 Thread Stefanus Du Toit
Hi, sorry for once again asking here, but after much searching I failed to find any help on this anywhere else again. I am able to burn CD-Rs with burncd, but now need to make a copy of an existing CD. What is the easiest way to simply create an image of the disc? I have tried the following: [s

Re: Copying CDs (with dd?)

2000-04-23 Thread Stefanus Du Toit
Hi, I feel so bad for sending so many mails to this list... I was unaware of the mailing list archives, where I have found an answer to this problem. I will in future consult these before posting here :). Thanks anyways, -- Stefanus Du Toit * WorldForger * Unix Hacker * Open Source Fanatic mai

No Subject

2000-04-23 Thread $B;M7'BYG7(J
subscribe freebsd-stable subscribe cvs-all To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

MFCing SMP cleanups from -current into 4.x on wednesday

2000-04-23 Thread Matthew Dillon
I intend to MFC the preliminary SMP cleanups I did in current a few weeks ago back into 4.x. My current plan is to do this on wednesday. I do not expect there to be any complains since the SMP cleanups appear to have been working wonderfully in -current for some time now but

Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to be committed to 5.x and 4.x wednesday

2000-04-23 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matthew Dillon writes: >:I don't see anything justifying an immediate MFC in this patch. Please >:allow the normal waiting period to elapse before you MFC. > >Unless you can justify a reason for it NOT to be MFC'd immediately, I >see no reason to wait for

Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to be committed to 5.x and 4.x wednesday

2000-04-23 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matthew Dillon writes: >There's another good reason to MFC the linux patch on wednesday... >that is, to do it at the same time the SMP cleanup is MFC'd, and that >is because both patch sets require the linux kernel module to be >recompiled and I'd

Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to be committed to 5.x and 4.x wednesday

2000-04-23 Thread Matthew Dillon
:In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matthew Dillon writes: : :>:I don't see anything justifying an immediate MFC in this patch. Please :>:allow the normal waiting period to elapse before you MFC. :> :>Unless you can justify a reason for it NOT to be MFC'd immediately, I :>see no reason to wa

Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to be committed to 5.x and 4.x wednesday

2000-04-23 Thread Matthew Dillon
There's another good reason to MFC the linux patch on wednesday... that is, to do it at the same time the SMP cleanup is MFC'd, and that is because both patch sets require the linux kernel module to be recompiled and I'd rather not force people to do that twice. The SMP pat