On Fri, 24 Mar 2000, Michael DeMutis wrote:
> Here is my "cvsupfile"
>
> *default host=cvsup2.FreeBSD.org
> *default base=/usr
> *default prefix=/usr
> *default release=cvs
> *default tag=RELENG_3
> *default delete use-rel-suffix
>
> src-all
> src-crypto
> src-secure
> *default tag=.
> po
Thimble Smith wrote:
> Hi. I'm running 4.0-STABLE cvsup'd on Tuesday (21 Mar). It
> looks like pthread_kill() isn't killing the thread; I could be
> doing something wrong, of course. Here's the output of my test
> program:
From the POSIX spec (ISO/IEC 9945-1:1996), B.3.3.10, page 444:
"No
>>Kenneth W Cochran wrote:
>>> Somewhat all-of-a-sudden, I am unable to r/w mount a Linux ext2
>>> filesystem on the same hdd with my BSD. I get in my syslog (&
>>> on console):
>>> /kernel: WARNING: R/W mount of dev 0xe040a denied due to
>>> unsupported optional features
>>
>>This is tellin
On Fri, 24 Mar 2000, Tom Legg wrote:
> Well those two are missing src-sys-crypto which is the kicker. You
> can build a GENERIC kernel without src-sys-crytpo, but I know that a
> custom kernel with IPSEC will not build without these sources. I'm
> not sure how the newly built in ssh and ssl su
cvsuped a few hours ago RELENG_4:
root@vic# cd /usr/src/sys/i386/conf
root@vic# config -r Laa
Removing old directory ../../compile/Laa: Done.
Don't forget to do a ``make depend''
Kernel build directory is ../../compile/Laa
root@vic# cd ../../compile/Laa
root@vic# make depend all install :
...
-
BTW, this was not directed at you specifically but at many of those who
complain about support. Please don't take this a my flaming you but
instead flaming those who expect commercial support from a freeware
project.
Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437
Cy Schubert
On Fri, 24 Mar 2000, Kenneth W Cochran wrote:
> So buildworld runs in its "own complete isolated" environment?
> IOW, buildworld uses its "own" tools, etc., & doesn't need ie.
> /bin, /usr/bin ... ?? (Except for a few basic things, like the
> compiler (with which to "bootstrap" itself?"... :)
If you will allow me, I'll explain the issues here.
Conrad Sabatier wrote:
>
> I smell shades of M$ here. :-)
>
> Seriously, isn't that one of the chief criticisms of Microsoft, that every
> time they release a new version of Windows, you have to plunk down for
> {more,better,faster,newer,bigg
